1

Topic: to a campaign became great again

In  there is no more a network neutrality. Here so at one stroke  overtook both , and . And , in which not the Internet, and .

2

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> in  there is no more a network neutrality. Here so at one stroke  overtook both , and . And , in which not the Internet, and . In  the  - are afraid that Russian submarines cut a cable with the Internet, and a fuck-up to trade (!)

3

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> in  there is no more a network neutrality. Here so at one stroke  overtook both , and . And , in which not the Internet, and . Read indirect news on this subject. With China it even nearby did not lie. In Russia locks easily manage, though are unpleasant. And in both cases lock is the government initiative. And it I so understand a network neutrality protection at level of the law from locks of any content. And the law entered at Obama, that is not too for a long time. But the canceling of protection of a content is not equal to locks under the government decree as in China or Russia. Here when Internet users in the USA start to complain, then we look.

4

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> in  there is no more a network neutrality. Here so at one stroke  overtook both , and . And , in which not the Internet, and . Who here? What is it? about ?

5

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> in  the  - are afraid that Russian submarines cut a cable with the Internet, and a fuck-up to trade (!) Quite good , that is it is supposed that the Internet is not necessary to Russia.

6

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, velkin, you wrote: V> Quite good , that is it is supposed that the Internet is not necessary to Russia. Russia without the British shops manages, and here if Britain to cut off from the world... I Suppose, in the tunnel La Manche is a cable. It is inaccessible to submarines, and tell to British, let calm down.

7

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> in  there is no more a network neutrality. Here so at one stroke  overtook both , and . And , in which not the Internet, and . And from what you took, what the network neutrality was in China, the Russian Federation or Iran?

8

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, velkin, you wrote: V> Read indirect news on this subject. With China it even nearby did not lie. In Russia locks easily manage, though are unpleasant. And in both cases lock is the government initiative. And it I so understand a network neutrality protection at level of the law from locks of any content. And the law entered at Obama, that is not too for a long time. But the canceling of protection of a content is not equal to locks under the government decree as in China or Russia. Here when Internet users in the USA start to complain, then we look. It is not connected to locks absolutely not, as far as I understand. Speech about  traffic. Such and in Russia is, for example, at an iota - normal speed of the Internet reaches 40 Mb/with,  are downloaded for the speed 100kb/with

9

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, velkin, you wrote: V> Read indirect news on this subject. With China it even nearby did not lie. In Russia locks easily manage, though are unpleasant. And in both cases lock is the government initiative. And it I so understand a network neutrality protection at level of the law from locks of any content. And the law entered at Obama, that is not too for a long time. But the canceling of protection of a content is not equal to locks under the government decree as in China or Russia. Here when Internet users in the USA start to complain, then we look. So already also complain. The neutrality is that from the point of view of speed of access yours , for example, and Google site - are equal. Now, who pays ISP . A board, a site of that also will boot with former speed.

10

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> it is not connected to locks absolutely not, as far as I understand. It is connected with  first of all. Suddenly providers receive in hands control over a content, and as consequence can bend  and Google truncating (or without truncating, for percent) to it of the advertizing traffic. Actually at  and at Google from it not sickly .

11

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> Hello, velkin, you wrote: V>> Read indirect news on this subject. With China it even nearby did not lie. In Russia locks easily manage, though are unpleasant. And in both cases lock is the government initiative. And it I so understand a network neutrality protection at level of the law from locks of any content. And the law entered at Obama, that is not too for a long time. But the canceling of protection of a content is not equal to locks under the government decree as in China or Russia. Here when Internet users in the USA start to complain, then we look. wl.> it is not connected to locks absolutely not, as far as I understand. Speech about  traffic. Such and in Russia is, for example, at an iota - normal speed of the Internet reaches 40 Mb/with,  are downloaded for the speed 100kb/with not, well  after all is deliberate  that traffic did not drive and for struggle against pirates. Such much where is. Sometimes they generally are closed. Besides, through vpn they should be swung at former speed.

12

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> I Suppose, in the tunnel La Manche is a cable. It is inaccessible to submarines, and tell to British, let calm down. Do not prompt. A paranoia about a tunnel yet did not announce.

13

Re: to a campaign became great again

Hello, mizuchi, you wrote: M> in  there is no more a network neutrality. Here so at one stroke  overtook both , and . And , in which not the Internet, and . In Russia a network neutrality never was, we live somehow. And in States was not to 2015 like a year.