26

Re: Matrix bli-in...

M> Probably, this yes. Very similar. It will be necessary to look through houses

27

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Ops> Yes it, , almost the first film where showed the infinite magnification of a photo without loss or with quality recovery. And. Well it yes. It agree. With great reserve pulls on a drawing. But any flights of the house-pyramid  not a drawing.

28

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> Hello, rm822, you wrote: MTD>>> Running on an edge 1982 looks and it is now excellent - here yes, I take off a hat. R>> to whom as. Personally for me   - a sediment and perception with the years did not change in any way R>> K> figs knows. Very atmospheric film. In difference from a matrix baby's dummy it is possible to explain on fingers that means ?

29

Re: Matrix bli-in...

> it is possible to explain on fingers that means ? In Google ? https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D0%B0%D … 1%82%D1%8C

30

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: >> it is possible to explain on fingers that means ? K> in Google ? https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D0%B0%D … 1%82%D1%8C at what here Google it is interesting to me as the person can explain it

31

Re: Matrix bli-in...

> at what here Google > it is interesting to me as the person can explain it also in an Internet ? Under the link there is a determination.  not I will in essence.

32

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, AWSVladimir, you wrote: AWS> On effects the Matrix at level of the modern films. AWS> a class film, look.  your matrix. "A diamond hand" look...

33

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, MTD, you wrote: MTD> Hello, AWSVladimir, you wrote: AWS>> On effects the Matrix at level of the modern films. AWS>> as so that? MTD> Running on an edge 1982 looks and it is now excellent - here yes, I take off a hat. I looked at it recently, already forgot what year mounting (the director some times the film cut to pieces). The Large quantity of close ups, physiognomies simply shield all.

34

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, AWSVladimir, you wrote: AWS> is shorter, the antenna burned down, the screw with films departed, at  the Internet died. AWS> yes, yes, happens such. AWS> decided to watch films, climbed in granaries DVD-shek and to both th the Matrix-trilogy, interposed into a player and... AWS> All looked with the great pleasure though more than 18th years quitted the first film. Very many it was forgot. AWS> on effects the Matrix at level of the modern films. AWS> as so that? In what that a stage  was bent or went in cycles. As it is pleasant to whom. New films are not present. Only sequels. I about it already wrote as that  the Author: Cicero Date: 05.09 21:23. AWS> the Class film, look. Yes. I look sometimes.

35

Re: Matrix bli-in...

AWS> On effects the Matrix at level of the modern films. Well look now at that, whence in it  fights http://www.world-art.ru/animation/animation.php?id=108

36

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: VC>> It is a pity an ending changed at the last minute, but in the second and thirds of part the original scenario did not cut - well there  in the "real" world broke and  will power of hunters in the "real" world stops. You in course? VC>> here Christopher  with an ending in the Beginning did not bring - we and we do not know the real world "real" or not. K> yes what difference? All the same a film  the full. Looked only because of special effects. By the way to me idea about a matrix (it is finite not in such perverted type as in a film with waving pinches  ) came long before a film output at school. That is not visible that idea arguings.

37

Re: Matrix bli-in...

VC> that is not visible that idea arguings. Then yet only the Internet was not,  is not accessible because of that that the modem was too expensive was so where you were going to see it?

38

Re: Matrix bli-in...

V> I looked at it recently, already forgot what year mounting (the director some times the film cut to pieces). The Large quantity of close ups, physiognomies simply shield all. It you still  30-40 did not look. The item with. I do not see in physiognomies anything bad

39

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, MTD, you wrote: MTD> Running on an edge 1982 looks and it is now excellent - here yes, I take off a hat. Looked before going to cinema on the second part. Would not tell that it looked is direct perfectly.

40

Re: Matrix bli-in...

MTD> Running on an edge 1982 looks and it is now excellent - here yes, I take off a hat. It atmospheric. A picture, music, the general sensation any ... But the plot did not hook on me generally. However, I looked at it about 5 years ago, in 80 perception for certain there would be another.

41

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: V>> I looked at it recently, already forgot what year mounting (the director some times the film cut to pieces). The Large quantity of close ups, physiognomies simply shield all. K> it you still  30-40 did not look. There all speaks bulkiness of picture cameras. Therefore it is a lot of scenes in pavilions, actors are a little moved in a frame. As soon as cameras began decrease, directors began to experiment.

42

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: VC>> that is not visible that idea arguings. K> then yet only the Internet was not,  is not accessible because of that that the modem was too expensive was K> so where you were going to see IT? Idea - a feminine gender. I do not understand.

43

Re: Matrix bli-in...

VC> VC> idea - a feminine gender. "Arguing" - average VC> I do not understand. What exactly?

44

Re: Matrix bli-in...

MTD>> Running on an edge 1982 looks and it is now excellent - here yes, I take off a hat. UVV> looked before going to cinema on the second part. Would not tell that it looked is direct perfectly. It you in vain. Though if to look it as a matrix - because of special effects - I will agree

45

Re: Matrix bli-in...

TMU> It atmospheric. A picture, music, the general sensation any ... Still - itself  the soundtrack wrote apropos  - I will disagree. This constant rain and . I remember generally  from this subject TMU> But the plot did not hook on me generally. TMU> However, I looked at it about 5 years ago, in 80 perception for certain there would be another. Well there there is a row of the moments taking for soul. From the last scene and a monologue  generally I go. For soul the beret is direct

46

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: TSP>> Distracts from  computer graphics details. K> and there it generally was? Something I do not remember. Yes whence during those times, all from nature removed:

47

Re: Matrix bli-in...

LL> Yes whence during those times, all from nature removed: LL> Image: blade runner 00.jpg I think it scenery. The item with. In course, what in 2001 space  schedules were not generally?

48

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: LL>> Yes whence during those times, all from nature removed: LL>> Image: blade runner 00.jpg K> I think it scenery. It if I correctly remember, NewTek LightWave.

49

Re: Matrix bli-in...

V> There all speaks bulkiness of picture cameras. Therefore it is a lot of scenes in pavilions, actors are a little moved in a frame. As soon as cameras began decrease, directors began to experiment. From what it to be bulky. Recall earlier mute cinema. Everyones . There close ups are faster a rarity. In 30-40 it is faster a mode. Or that game of the actor is better for uncovering.

50

Re: Matrix bli-in...

Hello, MTD, you wrote: MTD> Running on an edge 1982 looks and 4 evenings are now excellent, the film worked as soporific, on 5th wasted on the accelerated. It was not pleasant. But as soporific - excellent means.