51

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> And if the plane is necessary to me? And still a steamship and personal island in Pacific ocean? You should not want it.--------------------------- at us in department it is one of favourite phrases  a manager. When support comes to department and says that the user wanted here such here a counter, to it always answer: "the User should not want it." And so, but unfortunately now at the time of capitalism you cannot understand it. You a customer, you stupidly want, want, want...

52

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> And how to compare, who is better, and who is worse? Demagogy.

53

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, VladFein, you wrote: VF> (which meaningly moderates the needs and raises possibilities). You so told as though in it is  the bad

54

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, Dead Down, you wrote: Pzz>> And if the plane is necessary to me? And still a steamship and personal island in Pacific ocean? > You should not want it. And if all the same I want, what with me make?

55

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, Dead Down, you wrote: Pzz>> And how to compare, who is better, and who is worse? > Demagogy. No, not demagogy. If it is supposed to select the best, it is very interesting to me, by what criterion will compare, say, milkmaids and professors among themselves.

56

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, Dead Down, you wrote: > And so, but unfortunately now at the time of capitalism you cannot understand it. You a customer, you stupidly want, want, want... It agree. Recently met judgement that a medicine for a diabetes specially do not invent, as corporations are interested to sell all life insulin to diabetics. The same concerns also a cancer. Capitalism brakes science development, at communism most likely many illnesses would be eradicated.

57

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, Glory, you wrote: but the service is not operation as it is not directed on extraction of advantage or creation of any favor. The material product does not form by service, but here the favor is quite obvious.

58

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> And if all the same I want, what with me make? Shoot. For breed cleaning.

59

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Pzz> Is not present, not demagogy. If it is supposed to select the best, it is very interesting to me, by what criterion will compare, say, milkmaids and professors among themselves. Already offered, in an ideal to measure how many the person spends the forces for socially useful work (health as a result worsens and life is reduced)

60

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, Ikemefula, you wrote: I> the Material product does not form by service, but here the favor is quite obvious. Also what, though time in these lives  helped you?

61

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

QC> Yes is not present, something as you could think? God heard a saying "gave , gives and on a lawn". QC> It is necessary to cease to work and at you all will be. You are not able . It is necessary so: 26. Look at birds celestial: they do not sow, do not reap, do not collect in granaries, and the Father your Celestial feeds them. Whether and you much more differ from them? (The St. Gospel from Matfeja 6:26)

62

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, De-Bill, you wrote: QC>> Yes is not present, something as you could think? God heard a saying "gave , gives and on a lawn". QC>> It is necessary to cease to work and at you all will be. DB> you are not able . It is necessary so: DB> 26. Look at birds celestial: they do not sow, do not reap, do not collect in granaries, and the Father your Celestial feeds them. Whether and you much more differ from them? DB> (the St. Gospel from Matfeja 6:26) And suddenly is truth?

63

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, s_aa, you wrote: Pzz>> Is not present, not demagogy. If it is supposed to select the best, it is very interesting to me, by what criterion will compare, say, milkmaids and professors among themselves. _> already offered, in an ideal to measure how many the person spends the forces for socially useful work (health as a result worsens and life is reduced) It is the bad criterion. If the person badly is able to do the operation, it can spend many forces without special sense. Energetic idiots will be generally champions if to judge by this criterion. Besides, the expense of efforts is absolutely not mandatory undermines health. Actually, certain activity, physical and intellectual is necessary to a human body; the person who does nothing, risks to die ahead of time.

64

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, RussianFellow, you wrote: RF> And a socialism - it different. In many countries of Western Europe now a socialism. Simply it not such what was in the USSR. If it "not such" - means it not a socialism.

65

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, Glory, you wrote: I>> the Material product does not form by service, but here the favor is quite obvious. Also what, though time in these lives  helped you? Certainly. You use their result day and night. Their task is dispatching of tasks and decision-making, control.

66

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, Ikemefula, you wrote:> Also what, though time in these lives  helped you? I> Certainly. You use their result day and night. Their task is dispatching of tasks and decision-making, control. No, I do not use result of operation of the stationary gangster (if you understand about what speech). I concern that category of the population about which our expensive government declared 38 million Russians are occupied "not clearly where and than.

67

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Pzz> It is the bad criterion. If the person badly is able to do the operation, it can spend many forces without special sense. Energetic idiots will be generally champions if to judge by this criterion. I wrote socially useful work, not very well write programs or wash floor. Pzz> Besides, the expense of efforts is absolutely not mandatory undermines health. Yes so. But it is necessary to consider actually expended time for operation and the conditional time of the lost life. Worked half an hour on liquidation of "Chernobyl" - receive island

68

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Pzz>> Is not present, not demagogy. If it is supposed to select the best, it is very interesting to me, by what criterion will compare, say, milkmaids and professors among themselves. _> already offered, in an ideal to measure how many the person spends the forces for socially useful work (health as a result worsens and life is reduced) Here an operation criterion consider weariness, and as.

69

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

>> And so, but unfortunately now at the time of capitalism you cannot understand it. You a customer, you stupidly want, want, want... QC> It agree. Recently met judgement that a medicine for a diabetes specially do not invent, as corporations are interested to sell all life insulin to diabetics. The same concerns also a cancer. QC> capitalism brakes science development, at communism most likely many illnesses would be eradicated. For a long time the engine working on water is invented, but oil corporations do not allow to launch it in manufacture. I a film such saw.

70

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Pzz>>> And if the plane is necessary to me? And still a steamship and personal island in Pacific ocean? >> You should not want it. Pzz> and if all the same I want, what with me make? Will treat, from past vestiges in mentality.

71

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

TMU> Here as an operation criterion consider weariness, and as. Solidarity. If one your child tries to study very much, but it turns out only on four with a minus, and another is quick to grasp all and especially not  receives quintuples? You  the first, and in every possible way remunerate the second?

72

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, RussianFellow, you wrote: RF> it is interesting, dear colleagues, whether the statement is true, what if will not work, there will be no means of subsistence? RF> or, generally speaking, it not so? Logically. And what you will eat, if you will not have money?

73

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, s_aa, you wrote: Pzz>> It is the bad criterion. If the person badly is able to do the operation, it can spend many forces without special sense. Energetic idiots will be generally champions if to judge by this criterion. _> I wrote socially useful work, not very well write programs or wash floor. Once again. Doing the same operation, one person all  and , and another, without a special pressure, makes several times more. Why work of the first should be appreciated above work of the second? Pzz>> Besides, the expense of efforts is absolutely not mandatory undermines health. _> yes so. But it is necessary to consider actually expended time for operation and the conditional time of the lost life. Worked half an hour on liquidation of "Chernobyl" - receive island In you tells the unconscious relation to operation, as to punishment.

74

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, TMU_1, you wrote: Pzz>>>> And if the plane is necessary to me? And still a steamship and personal island in Pacific ocean? >>> You should not want it. Pzz>> and if all the same I want, what with me make? TMU> will treat, from past vestiges in mentality. Well, then capitalism is better. If at me irrepressible desires let it is better to me simply than money does not suffice, than to appear in a madhouse.

75

Re: You will not work - there will be no means of subsistence?

Hello, alzt, you wrote: A> And what to do, if they die before you?... To tell to nobody about it and to continue to receive pension indifferently