Hello, wl., you wrote: wl.> but thought that correct! Reminded wl.> [q] wl.> the History did not save a name of the person to which for the first time in a head the light thought not came to produce cars, and *. wl.> http://2k.livejournal.com/520078.html At a current business case even it is not necessary to think of it. The vendor should make the good car with a heap of features, it is desirable that the car exceeded analogs for some price range. And further we see that competitors made antifog headlights and heating of seats. All is healthy, we too can, only the machine will be more expensive, and the factory cannot be engaged in charity. What to do? Certainly, to save on the cost price. Not, it is possible to lift labor productivity, but it is already made and at competitors it too high, here to squeeze out it turns out nothing. All right, what for it is spent for good painting of a body, anybody is possible 5 % on it and in flow of 5 years and does not note a difference. But at us good transmissions, it is better than at . All now let they think how to make a car better that someone bought it. Only 5 % on painting to save there is already not enough.