1

Topic: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Normally to any of the friends or even the relative of the people does not entrust 100 thousand dollars on loan (even if that mum swears to give with percent). And here to big bank - entrusts. Why? Not because in bank work sacred that is why that to bank is not favourable to steal or evade from payments. Thanks to the reputation the bank earns much more. Or still. Stock exchanges btc-e which even is not under control to the state/law Gave an example. The stock exchange could get away with all money but did not begin to do it. Why? Because for a floor of year they earn so much, how many can steal is momentary. And for the following a floor of year - as much again. There is no sense to steal... Honesty/pravednost as though Turns out is absolutely not necessary. It is just necessary to build system so that to take a bribe or it was not favourable to steal. It like so and like also is not present. Here, I recall as one taxi driver rescued our president Porosheno from angry crowd by the machine.  promised to it the new machine and threw. Well why, after all it costs nothing to it to indemnify a loss, that at it is a lot of money and the reputation is important? Like and it is not favourable to it to deceive, but nevertheless it made it... Still there was a case as very large Ukrainian bank PrivatBank stirred up $2 thousand at the acquaintance. Blocked on the account and told that they had an error, type will do recalculation. And some years so were pulled. It only one case, was also another (when blocked on suspicion and through court all the same gave). Thus nobody trusts that the bank is capable of the such. Think that the person impudently says lies or itself is guilty. Whether so there is an honesty/pravednost in itself? Or all business in advantage and creation of the correct system of mutual relations? It would be personally pleasant to you to work with the person who observes precepts?

2

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> it is normal to any of the friends or even the relative of the people does not entrust 100 thousand dollars on loan (even if that mum swears to give with percent). And here to big bank - entrusts. Define to begin with about what carrier of honesty you you ask, about the person or about the organization or....

3

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

S> And here to big bank - entrusts. You now trust what bank?

4

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

5

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Whether S> So there is an honesty/pravednost in itself? Or all business in advantage and creation of the correct system of mutual relations? I think - the mankind dip in madness was not a part of the plan of America or global . This consequence of misunderstanding of indissolubility of communications between is narrow-special engineering science and ethical standards. America needed to resist to a socialism. For this purpose - it was necessary to kill in people aspiration to justice and representation about justice, to stop all talks that such justice and as it to reach. America included then still the program "fates-sex drugs" for youth, and transformed new generation in cattle. Chain reaction of decay of consciousness further went. Battling to idea of justice it was necessary to damage adherence to principles. The basic person has been derided and , the unscrupulous person, the person without solid foundations became the hero of America. Then hardly who even among the American tops understood that the developed cerebration necessary for maintenance of technically-difficult systems of a civilization is incompatible with unscrupulousness. Mind, intelligence and morals fondly planted, supposing in mind simple activity of a brain, and without understanding that activity of a brain can be pathological. http://economicsandwe.com/C95829DB2F00602D/

6

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> it is normal to any of the friends or even the relative of the people does not entrust 100 thousand dollars on loan (even if that mum swears to give with percent). And here to big bank - entrusts. S> why? Because that about whom you write - the full idiot. Only the full idiot does not ask a question: "why the bank at output to me of money checks all my cherished secrets but when I give it money, the bank does not give me all cherished secrets" S> Not because in bank work sacred that is why that to bank is not favourable to steal or evade from payments. To you how many years? Such impression that here  appeared. S> thanks to the reputation the bank earns much more.  to you of years???

7

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> it is normal to any of the friends or even the relative of the people does not entrust 100 thousand dollars on loan (even if that mum swears to give with percent). And here to big bank - entrusts. The trust question, is really important for people. But with your output it do not agree. On the contrary, the person goes to bank already after understood that in  close to a circle of contacts in this sense it nothing to catch. (That also happens more often). S> Why? Not because in bank work sacred that is why that to bank is not favourable to steal or evade from payments. Thanks to the reputation the bank earns much more. Because "more close" anything is not present. S> Or still. Stock exchanges btc-e which even is not under control to the state/law gave an example. The stock exchange could get away with all money but did not begin to do it. Why? Because for a floor of year they earn so much, how many can steal is momentary. And for the following a floor of year - as much again. There is no sense to steal. . S> honesty/pravednost as though Turns out is absolutely not necessary. It is just necessary to build system so that to take a bribe or it was not favourable to steal. Very much the other way. The trust is one of the most important components who causes mutual relations between people (and the organizations). But the system all the same should be built so that to steal it was unprofitable. S> it like so and like also is not present. Here, I recall as one taxi driver rescued our president Porosheno from angry crowd by the machine.  promised to it the new machine and threw. Well why, after all it costs nothing to it to indemnify a loss, that at it is a lot of money and the reputation is important? Like and it is not favourable to it to deceive, but nevertheless it made it... It spent the credit of trust... S> Still there was a case as very large Ukrainian bank PrivatBank stirred up $2 thousand at the acquaintance. Blocked on the account and told that they had an error, type will do recalculation. And some years so were pulled. It only one case, was also another (when blocked on suspicion and through court all the same gave). Thus nobody trusts that the bank is capable of the such. Think that the person impudently says lies or itself is guilty. It on a rarity of such cases. Type, it is not believed that such it is possible. But on it it is impossible to build long-term strategy. As soon as to a considerable quantity of people in such history it will be checked - the end to bank. Whether S> so there is an honesty/pravednost in itself? Or all business in advantage and creation of the correct system of mutual relations? The second. Without any doubts. And here the motivation is not important. It is important, that in all it there was a trust which justifies in practice. That so to whom that carries - not so important. It is important that waitings are fulfilled and prove to be true affairs. From here an output: do not promise more than you can fulfill, do not create the uprated waitings. Then all will be apprx. (here I can shutter lecture on an hour at least, with all substantiations, but in a simple way so.) S> it would be personally pleasant to you to work with the person who observes precepts? No! Experience shows that precepts live absolutely in other plane. In the person. And speech here goes about life outside of the person - that he promises and as fulfills. How it fulfills promises and defines, who it is for others. In itself observance of precepts absolutely about what does not speak. All system of precepts is vicious. Rules are necessary to provide frictionless existence of many people together. Also it is necessary to have wisdom, that the nobility when these rules it is possible and needs to be broken to provide comfort in a specific case. A stupid example: we admit, you go on a car to 4 o'clock in the morning. There is nobody in the street. Rose on a red traffic light. The in itself traffic light helps? Yes! In your specific situation? No! You are thus drunk. It is bad? Yes! In your specific situation? ! It is better, if you stand? Yes. It is possible to pass on red in your situation? Yes! And here the most interesting begins...

8

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, paul.marx, you wrote: PM> all system of precepts is vicious. PM> rules are necessary to provide frictionless existence of many people together. Also it is necessary to have wisdom, that the nobility when these rules it is possible and needs to be broken to provide comfort in a specific case. It that can and so. But... We Admit you be responsible for safety of big bank well or there majning-pulla. You invented the circuit as  1 million so that with probability of 99 % cannot understand who  and even at all do not note loss. Under the law - it is bad. But upon like as especially does much harm to nobody, after all it is a drop in the sea, system operation does not influence... Further. Suddenly at you the child falls ill and money for treatment are urgently necessary. What will the legalist makes? It not begins to steal, because the law above all. What makes the wise? , after all health of the child is more important than vicious laws everyone there. But a question: with whom you prefer to work? If  such wise solves that "all money of the world does not stand tears of the child"?

9

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> it is normal to any of the friends or even the relative of the people does not entrust 100 thousand dollars on loan (even if that mum swears to give with percent). And here to big bank - entrusts." You want to lose friends/posratstso with relatives -  it the large total of money "(. To me however carried, many times  to friends without what or then graters. S> because for a floor of year they earn so much, how many can steal is momentary. And for the following a floor of year - as much again. There is no sense to steal... S> honesty/pravednost as though Turns out is absolutely not necessary. It is just necessary to build system so that to take a bribe or it was not favourable to steal. It if clever also are ready to wait. But greed occasionally pushes on  less but now and at once. Whether S> So there is an honesty/pravednost in itself? Honesty it on  to a measure business of a principle and the realized action. S> it would be personally pleasant to you to work with the person who observes precepts? And precepts here what side?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

10

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, sharpcoder, you wrote: S> Only with such also I deal. And how to define in advance observes or not? S> me never threw. Carried. S> and at anybody questions or thoughts even are not present that I can not execute the obligation - to include them in composition of the future shareholders of the future company (at a sowing stage I sold 3 % of the future company, money attracted in the project at idea level). I think it already turned out reputation works.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

11

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, paul.marx, you wrote: PM> it is possible to pass on red in your situation? Yes!  here "yes" if unambiguously "is not present"?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

12

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> But upon like as especially does much harm to nobody, after all it is a drop in the sea, system operation does not influence...  at you concept.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

13

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> it is normal to any of the friends or even the relative of the people does not entrust 100 thousand dollars on loan (even if that mum swears to give with percent). And here to big bank - entrusts. For a long time somehow how many to relatives did not borrow, never anybody never returned. Last years 15 with relatives only on distance, and any talks about . Outside people it is more reliable.

14

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Poroshenko promised to it the new machine and threw. That not, the promise , not the promise.

15

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC> Hello, sharpcoder, you wrote: S>> Only with such also I deal. CC> and how to define in advance observes or not? It in trifles all is shown, and is noticeable almost at once.

16

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTy1d8dTwNk&t=1908 to Look from 31.48 (if with the preface) or from 34.15 - an essence.

17

Re: Whether you trust in honesty/pravednost?

Hello, paul.marx, you wrote: PM> all system of precepts is vicious. Precepts is as popular wisdom. What here the vicious? PM> rules are necessary to provide frictionless existence of many people together. Also it is necessary to have wisdom, that the nobility when these rules it is possible and needs to be broken to provide comfort in a specific case. Fascists came to power, changed laws and what, precepts will break? PM> a stupid example: very stupid. Especially, considering a precept does not get into the car drunk PM> it is admissible, you go on a car to 4 o'clock in the morning. There is nobody in the street. Rose on a red traffic light. PM> the in itself traffic light helps? Yes! PM> in your specific situation? No! PM> you are thus drunk. It is bad? Yes! PM> in your specific situation? ! PM> it is better, if you stand? Yes. PM> it is possible to pass on red in your situation? Yes! PM> and here the most interesting begins... The observation camera about which you do not know Is installed