Re: Re: Lanos
Hello, Denwer, you wrote: D> the knowledge Hinders it not when the raised transmission will be real more effective in the gasoline consumption plan. It is not always obvious that the raised transmission is more economic. To what that is more effective than tilt angle, after to / some corner not so effective. Too most and with acceleration. the nobility such subtleties not is obviously possible without direct data access . The person can invent not difficult algorithm under the machine which will be quite effective in most cases. At access to cards too is not present, so the information on an operation mode at it too rather restricted. Plus, it, in difference from the driver, does not possess the information that will be in the future with road. D> it so seems, to the driver these trifles are not obvious. It is simple so it seems that everyone knows where it is necessary to switch transmission, and here if to connect a notebook to and to deduce the schedule speed and all the same there are places not effective switching of transmission. Here still the big question what to name "effective" switching of transmission. On what parameters efficiency will measure? D> cruise on all for you a gas pedal, the main operation on switching of transmission it only pushes does not do. Naturally. The gear change and not always is necessary. D> And by the way, I will tell such interesting fact. Cruise on the mechanic increases fuel consumption. And and it is sensitive. You for example go uphill without cruise and you know that the hill comes soon to an end and it is possible roughly not to increase gas, let there will be a small deceleration, but after mountain you will win back loss of speed. The car of it does not know that tries and to speed up on a grief. And since There is no possibility to throw off transmission it starts to pour gasoline more for capacity magnification. Here also came. This incorrect comparing for in a variant gas you will pass this section more slowly. D> and cruise saving on rectilinear driving is banal, the human foot even at driving permanently fingers a gas pedal in small limits, as a result speed springs plus a minus 5. In +-2 I can check. +-5 on equal road is what already. Actually, on direct road no saving from cruise is present. There is it in the presence of small biases of that cruise can regulate gas at change of loading (bias), than the person more precisely. D> the nobility during what moment transmission change gives expenditure reduction, and when magnification. In such rigid optimization of the expenditure even will not be engaged, for except the expenditure there is still an elasticity which needs to be supported at any level. D> it at all so is simple as it seems. Many on simply are guided on "like norms goes it is not necessary to switch", or "that that turns raised, above I will cut". Nobody reflects about the expenditure. And correctly do, for under the expenditure conducts to store loss on dynamics. D> you do it once throughout several tens kilometers, in 95 % this uniform driving where kilograms already leave on the second plan. It is strong from congestion of a route depends. Happens so, it is necessary what to overtake often.