51

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, LuciferNovoros, you wrote: LN> Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U>> Tell now about world court U>> Chokak there? U>> Cause witnesses, inspectors, videos look, assort? Or "flow" - all are guilty? U>> the acquaintance had a court, was some times transferred that "the charge" side did not come. LN> Yes all is normal a flow goes.  - deprivation. Then you protest the decision in higher instance, only 10 days not , a limitation period to recover it is almost unreal. And the higher instance as is defined? LN> but you can declare the petition for a call of the side of charge, that is GAI officers in court. If the court accepts your petition transfer meeting - precisely. And here there it is already possible  - indications of witnesses, presence or absence of circuits, your signatures on them, video- and photocertificates. But it is better to do nevertheless it with the lawyer, most it is dreary, and you do not know all subtleties, as well as we here. Thanks. LN> P.S. Try to address to Victor Travinu. Well, it not the fact that consults, but at it a good command. To much really help.

52

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U> And the higher instance as is defined? World court - region (city) - area - the Supreme court... Somehow so.

53

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, LuciferNovoros, you wrote: LN> Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U>> And the higher instance as is defined? LN> world court - region (city) - area - the Supreme court... Somehow so. Well to me wrote "World court No such". How to learn, what its superior court?

54

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U> Well to me wrote "World court No such". U> How to learn, what its superior court? It already should be asked Muscovites. I - precisely do not know... Normally on a site there is an information on submission of higher judicial instance. Look on searchers.

55

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U> Remarkable "analysis"... Alas, this commonplace. U> cause witnesses, inspectors, videos look, assort? Or "flow" - all are guilty? If in the materials, which GAI officers in court sent, there will be no explicit jambs, most likely, will be a flow. In general as materials come to court, it is necessary to familiarize with them (the petition better in advance to write), to make copies and to search for jambs (mismatches in the circuit and indications of the inspector, for example).

56

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Lexey, you wrote: L> Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U>> Remarkable "analysis"... L> Alas, this commonplace. U>> cause witnesses, inspectors, videos look, assort? Or "flow" - all are guilty? L> if in the materials, which GAI officers in court sent, there will be no explicit jambs, most likely, will be a flow. In general as materials come to court, it is necessary to familiarize with them (the petition better in advance to write), to make copies and to search for jambs (mismatches in the circuit and indications of the inspector, for example). I.e. it is necessary to search at them for jambs, instead of the version to state? And the petition is as? To arrive to court, to ask materials on the business (simply on  or how?). Are obliged to give?

57

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Unforgiver, U> I.e. it is necessary to search at them for jambs, instead of the version to state? A variant "to state the version" does not eliminate search of jambs in the version . Just on jambs also it is possible to disorganize all business effectively. Consult to the lawyer. U> and the petition is as? To arrive to court, to ask materials on the business (simply on  or how?). Are obliged to give? Are obliged to give.

58

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: LN>> Yes all is normal a flow goes.  - deprivation. Then you protest the decision in higher instance, only 10 days not , a limitation period to recover it is almost unreal. U> and the higher instance as is defined? The complaint to the decision moves in that court that passed the decision. They send to the higher.

59

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U> I.e. it is necessary to search at them for jambs, instead of the version to state? For court, words have no value if they are not written in an official piece of paper. 1) if  something wrote, for court so it and is. 2) if  something wrote incorrectly, or did not write any important fact it is your almost unique chance. 3) if to state on paper and to demand to file. Your task as a matter of fact to state such version which does not contradict written in the protocol, but treats your actions under easier article.

60

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: > Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U>> I.e. it is necessary to search at them for jambs, instead of the version to state? > For court, words have no value if they are not written in an official piece of paper. > 1) If  something wrote, for court so it and is. > 2) If  something wrote incorrectly, or did not write any important fact it is your almost unique chance. > 3) If to state on paper and to demand to file. > Your task as a matter of fact to state such version which does not contradict written in the protocol, but treats your actions under easier article. Gold words, Yury Venediktovich And here these written words and circuits - with itself to bring? Or to arrive there in advance and to ask to file them No to the such? By the way, the unpacked list of my penalties - it can have any value? There only for a speed, for not fastened children and for  the pedestrian (even more moronic, than present. Here though formally  it is possible, and there - the pedestrian quitted on road through 5 bands from me, I "did not pass" it. I speak - you that, I would stop, to me behind would drive, very close the machine was. And in the answer - and if the pedestrian sharply ran also to you under wheels? Well, it the sprinter-condemned man...).

61

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U> Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: >> Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U>>> I.e. it is necessary to search at them for jambs, instead of the version to state? >> For court, words have no value if they are not written in an official piece of paper. >> 1) If  something wrote, for court so it and is. >> 2) If  something wrote incorrectly, or did not write any important fact it is your almost unique chance. >> 3) If to state on paper and to demand to file. >> Your task as a matter of fact to state such version which does not contradict written in the protocol, but treats your actions under easier article. U> gold words, Yury Venediktovich U> And here these written words and circuits - with itself to bring? Or to arrive there in advance and to ask to file them No to the such? On court to bring, and when pledge a word to tell "I ask to file my explanations", both to approach to the judge and to give. U> by the way, the unpacked list of my penalties - it can have any value? Can. What I do not know. But at me in the first decision the judge wrote: "earlier attracted in administrative responsibility", or even "considering that earlier it was attracted". The decision truth was - the penalty thus. But generally is an aggravating circumstance. Characterizes you, as spiteful infringer. Still the court somehow checks, these penalties are paid or not.

62

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: U>> And here these written words and circuits - with itself to bring? Or to arrive there in advance and to ask to file them No to the such? > On court to bring, and when pledge a word to tell "I ask to file my explanations", both to approach to the judge and to give. U>> by the way, the unpacked list of my penalties - it can have any value? > Can. What I do not know. But at me in the first decision the judge wrote: "earlier attracted in administrative responsibility", or even "considering that earlier it was attracted". The decision truth was - the penalty thus. But generally is an aggravating circumstance. Characterizes you, as spiteful infringer. And "earlier it was attracted" not important under what article? > Still the court somehow checks, these penalties are paid or not. Are paid.

63

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U> And "earlier it was attracted" not important under what article?

64

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: > Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: LN>>> Yes all is normal a flow goes.  - deprivation. Then you protest the decision in higher instance, only 10 days not , a limitation period to recover it is almost unreal. U>> and the higher instance as is defined? > the Complaint to the decision moves in that court that passed the decision. They send to the higher. Or reject, such too it is possible

65

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, mike_rs, you wrote: LN>>>> Yes all is normal a flow goes.  - deprivation. Then you protest the decision in higher instance, only 10 days not , a limitation period to recover it is almost unreal. U>>> and the higher instance as is defined? >> the Complaint to the decision moves in that court that passed the decision. They send to the higher. _> or reject, such too it is possible  the Russian Federation Article 325. Actions of court of the first instance after obtaining appeal complaints, representations 1. The court of the first instance after obtaining appeal complaints, the representations, submitted in installed by article 321 of the present Code period and corresponding to requirements of article 322 of the present Code, is obliged to direct to the persons participating in business, a copy of the complaint, representation and the documents enclosed to them. 2. The persons participating in business, have the right to bring into court the first instance of objection in writing concerning appeal complaints, representations with application of the documents confirming these objections, and their copies which amount corresponds to an amount of the persons participating in business, and have the right to familiarize with business materials, with the arrived complaint, representation and objections concerning them. 3. After period of the appeal the court of the first instance directs business with the appeal complaint, representation and the arrived objections concerning them to court of appeal instance. Before the expiry of the term of the appeal business cannot be directed to court of appeal instance. It is important not to break period, and to fulfill article 322 requirements, they simple. At performance, point 3 of a freedom of action of court does not assume, direct in  court and everything, without variants.  the Russian Federation Article 322. The content appeal complaints, representations 1. Appeal complaint, representation should contain: 1) the court name in which the appeal complaint, representation moves; 2) the name of the person, making the complaint, representation, its residence or the location; 3) instructions on a judgement which will be appealed against; 4) requirements of the person, making the complaint, or requirements of the public prosecutor bringing representation, and also the bases on which they consider a judgement wrong; 5) became invalid since January, 1st, 2012. 6) the list applied on the complaint, representation of documents. 2. In the appeal complaint, representation the requirements which have been not declared by a legal investigation in court of the first instance cannot contain. 3. The appeal complaint subscribes the person, making the complaint, or its representative. To the complaint submitted the representative, the power of attorney or other document, certifying power of the representative if in business there is no such power should be enclosed. Appeal representation subscribes the public prosecutor. 4. The document confirming payment of the state tax if the complaint is subject to payment is applied on the appeal complaint. 5. Appeal complaint, representation and the documents enclosed to them are represented with the copies which number corresponds to number of the persons participating in business.

66

Re: Turn through 2 continuous

Hello, namespace, you wrote: N> If so was, lawyers and the bookkeeper would sit without operation. N> regularly there are additions, corrections and comments Where to esteem the correction about overtaking? If that, the link was on a site of one of leading such offices-lawyers. If there were corrections, they there would be mentioned.