Topic: Turn through 2 continuous
I welcome. In advance I apologize for many . In general, got here on a subject. Upon - a marking idiotic, and that is erased, on road slush. Behind turn - two-band one-sided road, but by rules it is possible to turn only on its right band. Because opposite to the left band - double continuous. On life all and turn in 2 rows. In right - by rules, through rupture, in left - a minimum one wheel through double (therefore the marking is erased there). Me stopped and began to "sew" 12.15.4 - driving on counter. I speak - you are not right, these are 12.16.2"turn or a turn in not supposed place". They showed to me any "" on which on video turn process is removed. I speak - well and? (I regret that did not specify in the protocol that showed to me any left without the certificate). Turned, I do not deny. A marking it is not visible. If it there double - that it is ready to be punished on 12.16.2 and more so not to do. . But the interesting began. At first he told "When are ready to be in court?" - In what? - In world court of...th region. - yes it is never ready, for what? 12.16.2 - the penalty 1000-1500 without courts. - at you 12.15.4 - Is not present, and I will not sign the protocol with such article. - but you went on . - Yes, intersected it. - but same all the same driving on a counter band! Quitted, called by a telephone hotline. Told what to sign it is necessary, but is mandatory to specify circumstance and that do not agree. I specified. Then they something among themselves conferred, and to one another told "yes make out". While made out, the second to me my rights and duties, and rules of obtaining of the rights after deprivation, and that all such clever go to court and there of all of them equally deprive, because driving on a counter band is. More shortly with them it to consider it was useless. And here suddenly to me give the protocol in which it is specified - to be in group of analysis of such number. WTF? What group of analysis? In court? Is not present? In general, I quit their machine, I sit down in the, there with me the acquaintance went. I speak - a pancake, , . And she already , and too speaks that it is 12.16.2 and 1-1,5 thousand penalty. I speak - well we go in witnesses you we write down. I approach to and so - here the witness who went with me in the machine and is ready to confirm that a marking is visible and that our manoeuvre - turn. He somehow spitefully asked the passport, wrote down in the protocol. Then with the lawyer spoke - she told that very strange course - to send in analysis group. Advised to write explanatory about visibility, about absence of the certificate on "camera", to specify that under given article it was never attracted. Called the familiar judge, that confirmed - with articles at once to them direct, without analysis groups. And from you similar wanted money when frightened of court. Here it is actually interesting: 0. What except explanatory, the witness and the protocol it is possible and it is necessary to file? To take a picture of a marking there it is problematic, enough big traffic in this place. 1. What chances on if not the full justification, on 1500 penalties? For my part the witness, from their side "left" . 2. What chances then to have this inspector (it there I booze all "broke" - that leaving an ambush and overtaking me, it stopped also a finger, instead of a staff, showed on me and directed it towards a roadside, this plus "", plus a wrong direction to analysis group). To me at all on purpose from it to collect something. Simply that at it another time "conscience" woke up Where to write the complaint? To its heads or in Department of own safety? Or to hammer, for it is useless? 3. What to speak, that not to tell in analysis group? 4. There is a different judgement into the account of the partial justification. One advise - if to you tell that , not deprivation, and on the first time 5 the penalty - agree. Others say that it is not necessary to agree, since You defend the innocence, and then agree with charge that can be ambiguously treated. 5. What will be if not to come to analysis group? Transfer? Carry out the decision without me? How many it is possible not to come there? 6. If the decision of group of analysis will not suit me - at once to tell, what does not arrange and to ask to bring the matter into court? In court it is possible to submit , delaying period of delivery of the rights? (The rights are necessary on New Year's vacation, further figs with them, let take away, if it will not be possible to fulfill item 1). 7. Whether it is real in group of analysis and in court something to achieve most, or it is necessary to employ the lawyer? 8. Read that after court within three days it is necessary to hand over the rights. If not to hand over? Stop and can punch on basis, what the rights are selected?