Hello, mjau, you wrote: M> Gates, Jobs and Tsukerberg without ' ' formations now laugh to you directly in the person. The naive young man. Passage from one class in another is rare and about it knows the whole world in the form of those exceptions confirming rules. M> it is finite, if your father the billionaire and mum the billionaire from approximately 90 % probability and the child will be the billionaire and at it is odds in the form of formation, position and communications. Just about. The keyword in all is to a tirade - "certainly". M> BUT in the same way how it is all it should is possible worthlessly to go It under article of excuses or where?) ) M> and the person without formation, position and communications can become the new billionaire. Here statistics says that this probability less than one million share of one percent. For the whole world for the last 40 years you could enumerate only 3 surnames (yes let them even would be from tens), and those have been connected with arisen with 0-lja area - with IT. Here most it is not a shame so to be substituted? M> only a rule of natural evolution - more successful generation leaves descendants and more favourable position. You are again substituted by misunderstanding of words with which you operate. Evolution here works only within one-two generations. And then, on the contrary, evolution mechanisms are disconnected because of class insulation. M> so it is the next crying in favor of poor. It is next ignoramuses. It was necessary to give in large quantities poor formation in the USSR as they showed achievements in a science frequently better natives of rich families, there in respect of mind (for the obvious reasons) from generation in generation happens on the contrary - degradation. Too after all the known fact. M> in the normal world any driver of the truck in a state to provide qualitative (formation in the USA is not restricted to Harward) in the USA not in a state. The maximum that is presumed to itself by a rather poor family - college. It is type of our TECHNICAL TRAINING COLLEGE, only is worse. after their college still it is necessary to take in addition the prof. of occupation on a speciality, and at us after the TECHNICAL TRAINING COLLEGE - it is not necessary. Well or to live in a trailer, instead of the house, to educate children in college better. Here on a choice. You would like to live the life in a trailer? M> training to a sonny if that not absolutely that that became the engineer or the lawyer, is not present generally any barriers insuperable to it. A barrier is money. To me in office many local Americans stood in a queue with questions. And there questions of often level of 1-2nd courses HIGH SCHOOL or present 10-11th classes of school (up to banal geometry). You after all lose sight that they under the school program have a lag approximately for couple of years and it is all it is necessary to catch up at institute. In the total, in their HIGH SCHOOL for the first 4 years they transit approximately as much, how many at us for the first 2 years of training, but they already receive a crust of the bachelor. And then it is necessary to take as early as 2 years to receive, , higher education. Also there is it still approximately in 1.5-2 times more expensively for a year. In general, there not formation, and the mechanism on exhaustion of money. More or less normal formation, level of our provinces (Kazan, Ufa, Kharkov, Sevastopol) - it there costs simply transcendental money and not that to parents-shofram it is not accessible, but also much where as to richer parents too. Therefore, there credits for formation which you approximately till 32-35 years give are popular. It instead of house purchase on credit, it you take later. , from bottoms to be punched upward in the USA it is actually impossible. is a natural randomness, a situation too known - the guy-student appeared in a proper place in due time. And others hundred millions for the last 40 years did not appear. Bill Gates and Jobs - too kiddies not from simple families. Without their communications of anything at them would not fly. In the sense that they would not retain the business in the hands. Them would redeem in the same way as redeem thousand similar startups annually. M> it not any astronomical totals Looking how to consider. In the USA generally all . Each of payments like not astronomical, but astronomical is an amount of these payments. And it was the most unpleasant discovery for me once. I.e. From here their money seemed big, and arriving there I saw that more than 80 % of Americans live sharply more poorly me. Well unless the situation from a car at them is hardly more interesting, in 1.5-2 times the car at that point in time was cheaper and the credit for it in 5 times is cheaper. And if to take the true cost of THEIR house in recalculation on its cost here ( - doghouses) it is possible to state safely that approximately 90 % , will be poorer than our, strongly standing on the feet person. To simply you in ears poured, and you and checked. And it is necessary to check most.