26

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

NANOSECOND> And if Sobchak - too Putin's daughter? Much becomes clear! Aha. Illegitimate for a photo wives  in studio, yes laziness to search

27

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

R> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OoJnApejhk some times  and he did not understand  here told. Continuous water. It was blew off . Here what a difference earlier to wet in a toilet. All at once -  - the muzhik!!! And  to look oppositely

28

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Syria left also fell nothing. I ask to note: it already left Syria twice, but you continue to trust.

29

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: T>> Speak that Tramp prepares for Putin a gift in February and does what that the new list and sanctions where personally Putin will already figure. _> does not help. The problem of efficiency of sanctions, and generally consequences of hysterical actions of the USA and other "partners", is very well noticed here <- I advise to read from words "very strange". This "very strange" began for a long time already, simply the most different people now began note, including, probably, already and "partners". Yes, not... Simply towers-izlucheteli here painfully well work and noticeably distort the validity. Therefore the present physics \economy seems something to strange.

30

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> some times  and he did not understand  here told. Continuous water. It was blew off . Here what a difference earlier to wet in a toilet. All at once -  - the muzhik!!! And  to look oppositely So look at the full video of conference. It answered a question of the American journalist, whether Russia will help the United States to wet Iran and the North Korea.

31

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> That it does not happen, Putin should leave Donbass by this time. Here from Syria deduce . Guess, where they arrive

32

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

T> AI Term now strongly . Well name other term - anyway quality of controlling influences by a sudden saltus quitted on height unattainable for another countries. T> and to the present AI I think to saw to mankind yet one thousand years. That is when Shojgu directly tells about operating "a defensive supercomputer predicting development of military conflicts", he means an abacus, the world map and 10 generals around? Fondly. T>>> if Putin does not leave Donbass that as it then affects choices in Russia? _>> in any way. In a superstate choices from the outside to affect it is unreal, neither sanctions nor hackers. T> resources in the Russian Federation are not infinite. Other countries too. Quality of control solves more than an amount of resources - any gold child  confirms parent riches. Look for example at the Southern Flow - in 2012 when its building began, it was a typical course of the good player: If it will be constructed - , dependence of Europe on gas grows, necessity in American  falls. If the USA press on the feeble countries, directly or through Germany - too , we turn a flow to Turkey, remaining fight among themselves solving a question "who is guilty" - is direct a chess fork which could break only if Turkey suddenly comes off. And suddenly in Turkey real chance of revolution. It was possible for Erdoganu to arrange evacuation directly to Rostov, to drop "at the desire of Erdogana" a bomb on a staff of conspirators, however gave only oral warning that it could avoid attempt in time. Both all. And it suddenly sufficed. The size of controlling influence (and rescue of head this controlling influence where  than that because of what panics the USA, the nearest comparing - if hackers from the Russian Federation cancelled choices in the USA and left Obama in power) was minimum. It thus that the rate was huge - possible loss of the ally in region, failure of the Turkish flow, appearance about-amerikansko-European the authorities in Turkey which arranges failure of all Syrian operation. And again  - normal people apply controlling influences directly proportional to risks; minimum sufficient influence - AI-system sign. Even more artful game happened round American . An infrastructure of ports SPG which the USA planned for themselves and lowerings of a share of Gazprom, suddenly became means of a diversification of export for the Russian Federation. And when the Russian Federation started to build  terminals the majority of experts on TV was surprised ", at us pipes are?!" And it as turned out - under the pressure of the USA customers prepared reception points, and because of geography (and the high price of slate gas) Russian became more favourable American. So callously and cynically to use all successively to itself on favor people are not able, and here computers - only and play. Nevertheless while it is the next theory of plot. That is really watched - so it that with war in Syria (if people were going to rescue Syria, they would not began to wait for almost full defeat of the governmental armies), with mastering of Arctic regions, with holding of Donbasa in a hover - everywhere "inhuman" coldness and a minimum of actions. In a reality FSB in cellars can grew up the crews think tanks with which so the USA bragged in due time, - But is more likely trusted in AI, than in that that, expelling journalists for doors, age  uncles behind long desktop led by Putin sharply revive and start to consider good variants of actions on all planet with a speed  commands that-where-when

33

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Speak that Tramp prepares for Putin a gift in February and does what that the new list and sanctions where personally Putin will already figure. Tramp personally reported on you? T> that it does not happen, Putin should leave Donbass by this time. T> if Putin does not leave Donbass that as it then affects choices in Russia? We rally more strongly round our bald dwarf

34

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, 3V, you wrote: T>> If Putin does not leave Donbass that as it then affects choices in Russia? 3V> yes does not affect in any way. The result of choices will be 68-69 % or even 70. Whence such accuracy? The citizen Rand personally promised to you? Or spouses the Gauss and Anna?

35

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T>>> If Putin does not leave Donbass that as it then affects choices in Russia? TP>> I will unambiguously tell - if leaves - that the rating falls T> From Syria left also fell nothing. And from Donbass leaves, when all affairs there finishes

36

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

DP> Yes, not... Simply towers-izlucheteli here painfully well work and noticeably distort the validity. From news I look the Euronews and RBC, and I read English-speaking and mathematical texts of times in 10 more than Russian-speaking, and  about the politician. But even from such narrow embrasure the amount of strangenesses the Author is visible that: hi_octane Date: 16.12 15:55 for a long time fell outside the limits "norm". DP> Therefore the present physics \economy seems something to strange. Well here looking from 2017 - what of economy of December 2014 was real and what was created by towers-radiators - at the Central Bank of the Russian Federation or at Obama?

37

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: T>> Speak that Tramp prepares for Putin a gift in February and does what that the new list and sanctions where personally Putin will already figure. _> does not help. The problem of efficiency of sanctions, and generally consequences of hysterical actions of the USA and other "partners", is very well noticed here <- I advise to read from words "very strange". This "very strange" began for a long time already, simply the most different people now began note, including, probably, already and "partners". Much earlier a bit explaining an event the Author: hi_octane Date: 25.03.17 hypothesis at me was in the list purely comic. But the same sharp courses in economy the Author: hi_octane Date: 02.03.17, and not only in the, but also in economy, for example, Venezuela. Similar that Putin's words about AI and global leadership on one of the last performances - can quite be a hint for foreign analysts. It is especially characteristic that was their "native" terminology - really using the term "global leadership" and anxious by it on our planet only one is used. As though it did not appear that it there was a hint of the same importance as well as regularly mentioned " of a dust to swallow". Zbignev Bzezhinsky "in the bunker can at  any" at . Easier it do not advertize

38

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T>>> it is similar that Putin's words about AI and global leadership on one of the last performances - can quite be a hint for foreign analysts. It is especially characteristic that was their "native" terminology - really using the term "global leadership" and anxious by it on our planet only one is used. As though it did not appear that it there was a hint of the same importance as well as regularly mentioned " of a dust to swallow". T> AI Term now strongly . And to the present AI I think to saw to mankind yet one thousand years. So it # '  years to saw. And at Putin already now is. Thousand scientists from Gulaga do not allow to tell lies T>>> If Putin does not leave Donbass that as it then affects choices in Russia? _>> in any way. In a superstate choices from the outside to affect it is unreal, neither sanctions nor hackers. T> resources in the Russian Federation are not infinite. You die earlier

39

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: R>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OoJnApejhk K> some times  and he did not understand  here told. Continuous water. It was blew off . Here what a difference earlier to wet in a toilet. All at once -  - the muzhik!!! And  to look oppositely did not merge, and  in a post, grew wiser, and replaced rhetoric. Affairs from it all the same do not change. And here you for these years probably did not develop

40

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

T>> That it does not happen, Putin should leave Donbass by this time. F> here from Syria deduce . Guess, where they arrive On the distant east to watch of that as  will heat at ocean.

41

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

K> some times  and he did not understand  here told. Continuous water. It was blew off . Here what a difference earlier to wet in a toilet. All at once -  - the muzhik!!! And  to look oppositely Putin asks for a negotiating table, but Tramp similar solved without any negotiations with Putin to erase  from the person of the earth.

42

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

BFE> I Ask to note: it already left Syria twice, but you continue to trust. Circus with Kuzej it was that that: "the Admiral of Smiths" approached to coast of Syria on November, 12th. On November, 14th, 2016 aviagrouping "Admiral Kuznetsova" lost the first plane - MiG-29K. Under the official version, on a fighter there was "an aviation incident", and it failed in water in several kilometers from a cruiser. On December, 5th, 2016 the multiple objective fighter Su-33 broke at attempt to sit down into a deck of a heavy aviacarrying cruiser "Admiral of Smiths", informs "Interfax" referring to the message of the Minister of Defence. The pilot catapulted, it was picked up by the saving helicopter, specifies issuing The Aviationist. Well and Kuzja eventually without withstanding a shame left on repair.

43

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

F> here from Syria deduce . Guess, where they arrive Speak that to Sudan

44

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

M> Zbignev Bzezhinsky "in the bunker Can at  any" at . Can. But if there there was one Zbignev, or even group of clever men of the same level - their courses all the same would be more human. In games there is such concept "" when the person and the computer work in steam. For example the person sets a direction + the computer counts details to trifles or though specifies in the strongest possible answer courses. The group such can there as  + the supercomputer about which broadcast Shojgu, -. It is Still very characteristic for people - "" any advantageous position to a clear victory. For the modern Russia is on the contrary characteristic to stop struggle at once as soon as it becomes visible that the opponent any courses to change a situation in the unprofitable side for Russia cannot. Such absolutely easy do chess AI. Well or if the chess bothered - it is possible to listen  fights AlphaGO with people - there commentators too permanently are surprised "why AlphaGO threw a situation, and presented  2-3 points? Whether an error it?" And the computer appears already the person counted that or takes on this edge 3 points and loses on other 4, or too throws this edge but also misses the points => all the same loses. For comparing present that the USSR in the Great Patriotic War threw out German armies for boundaries of Poland, destroyed by bombing to Germans the key defensive enterprises and left from a battlefield. Without a taking of Berlin, without capitulation, and on the contrary left Germany and England possibility to pull out each other though to 1960, and Poland without any support from any side needed to turn only from the country to territory. For the USSR such it is impossible to present, and for the modern Russia? M> it is simple it do not advertize Then, most likely, they would get one more, which .

45

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: K>> some times  and he did not understand  here told. Continuous water. It was blew off . Here what a difference earlier to wet in a toilet. All at once -  - the muzhik!!! And  to look oppositely T> Putin asks for a negotiating table, but Tramp similar solved without any negotiations with Putin to erase  from the person of the earth.  is a more Chinese headache, than ours. And what in most   to you under  about  shutter? Destroys by bombing its Tram, Putim requests about mercy and come in  . Here it? Well you trust, it is necessary to trust, and that Putin attacks.

46

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Well and Kuzja eventually without withstanding a shame left on repair. Jokes, how  all  and what they  performed by  it is always very ridiculous. More ridiculously only jokes of the impotent man that at someone did not rise.

47

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Syria left also fell nothing.  live, defended it from the American tyrants.

48

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> If Putin does not leave Donbass that as it then affects choices in Russia? In any way.

49

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: _> does not help. The problem of efficiency of sanctions, and generally consequences of hysterical actions of the USA and other "partners", is very well noticed here Especially an apex of the USA frightens absolutely atypical (and - NOT PREDICTED, on the models accepted at them and estimations) response of the Russian Federation on "very insulting and explicitly impudent" West actions in which consequence, finally, in lost there is a western community. They answer each your military cunning with unpredictable nonsense (Zadornov and generally article about

50

Re: Sanctions personally to Putin

Hello, , you wrote: What a difference written off inflatable boats of the NATO, they still serve as fire power of fleet of Ukraine! Ahead at  fierce  - the cruiser "Ukraine" should be cut, differently it sinks at a wall. At  there is a suitcase without the pen of the same project - a cruiser "Moscow". But mean  somewhere find money to support it in working order, and at   . And so in all. And here these biped something there  how at  something sank, fell, blew up, etc.