26

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

T>> What for it is Kolomojsky, which Privat successfully sold. S> who to you told that sold? He declared that at it Privat wrung out. Here also returns itself it. Well that wrung out a clear horse-radish, I too so would speak.

27

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Who to you told that sold? He declared that at it Privat wrung out. Here also returns itself it. Sold. Successfully for the buyer.

28

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Well that wrung out a clear horse-radish, I too so would speak.  was not unprofitable from what he would "sell" a milk cow? These are hearings such started up to rehabilitate actions of Poroshenko.

29

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Miljard of dollars suffices? Kolomojsky. I look, the Kolomojsky popular guy: https://strana.ua/news/112053-ukrainski … rdame.html

30

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: Maxim Ravreba found out Gendalfa at storm of the October Palace

31

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

S> Privat was not unprofitable from what he would "sell" a milk cow? Check Kolomojsky not which that person it would be possible to throw as the sucker.

32

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

T>> If for you it has what that value that why you now do not help Sake to storm a palace? S> so I and did not participate last time the Active minority is 4 %. Here in it and a problem: you write that all should quit, and itself do not quit. And why that of this all you do an output that power Poroshenka just about falls. How so it is possible?

33

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: G>> Is not present. Without discontent of mass nothing it turns out. It is basis, and a revolutionary situation - as radical expression of mass discontent - a consequence. T> name as want, I name it as a revolutionary situation. G>> 1) mass discontent T> And what now mass discontent? Your friends from  on forcemeat process, and they are happy?

34

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: T>> there was no such requirement, it is not necessary to invent. S> you in the mind? Look who such oligarch. It not the rich man, is the criminal who appropriated national property by political manipulations. On determination the oligarchy is a capital accrete with the power. About criminality it is told nothing

35

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> It does not speak, it is felt. The revolution smell soars long before in air. It soars in the TV set, instead of in air.)) from quite neutral lighting of the Maidan in the first 3 its weeks only in news to natural foam from a mouth of journalists 24 hours a day by February. So ,  to you "is not felt", this all suggested from the outside. T> All understood that with a vegetable was necessary that that to do a question was only in that when there will be an hour X. Who all"? The population Most part understood strictly other - anything with anybody it is not necessary to do, it is necessary not to select simply it again. Simply  a box took offense, became aggressive, drove on the compatriots, therefore have been sent, in the absence of banal manners and education. Therefore the country also collapses.

36

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> For whose account a banquet? At the western politicians is not present either explicit support of this , or explicit disapproval of Poroshenko. Instead of will be money - there will be no animated cartoons. ..... And we on what? We by such  cannot resist in any way. On that and calculation that the anchor is deeper...

37

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

T>> It does not speak, it is felt. The revolution smell soars long before in air. V> it soars in the TV set, instead of in air.)) V> from quite neutral lighting of the Maidan in the first 3 its weeks only in news to natural foam from a mouth of journalists 24 hours a day by February. So ,  to you "is not felt", this all suggested from the outside. It is felt long before the Maidan. T>> all understood that with a vegetable was necessary that that to do a question was only in that when there will be X. V> Who all"? The population Most part understood strictly other - anything with anybody it is not necessary to do, it is necessary not to select simply it again. The vegetable was not going to be re-elected, he as well as Putin wanted to make a show holiday of choices where the people solve nothing.

38

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> It is necessary to show only to it guilty in its problems to canalize this discontent. Quite right. For this purpose at us is  and who does not want - for those there is Navalnyj.

39

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V> Who all"? The population Most part understood strictly other - anything with anybody it is not necessary to do, it is necessary not to select simply it again. You, the main thing, here understand that it is necessary to select again, whether and that is not enough of that.

40

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> the Vegetable was not going to be re-elected, he as well as Putin wanted to make a show holiday of choices where the people solve nothing. You can recall, from whom at you this thought lodged in a head?

41

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, cheerysoft.com, you wrote: CC> Quite right. For this purpose at us is  and who does not want - for those there is Navalnyj. All so, you are right. And at opposition the variant:

42

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Check Kolomojsky not which that person it would be possible to throw as the sucker. On it it also takes away the bank back

43

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Here in it and a problem: you write that all should quit, and itself do not quit. And why that of this all you do an output that power Poroshenka just about falls. T> as so it is possible? So I heat another's hands get all time Let . My business to watch and analyze.

44

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> On determination the oligarchy is a capital accrete with the power. About criminality of nothing It is told and there is a criminality - to write laws under itself.

45

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T>>> It does not speak, it is felt. The revolution smell soars long before in air. V>> it soars in the TV set, instead of in air.)) V>> from quite neutral lighting of the Maidan in the first 3 its weeks only in news to natural foam from a mouth of journalists 24 hours a day by February. So ,  to you "is not felt", this all suggested from the outside. T> It is felt long before the Maidan. It when in Kiev is twisted by 16 TV channels of all? Thus, what in all remaining country under 200?) ) To not bad you Yushchenko twirled nuts, . T>>> All understood that with a vegetable was necessary that that to do a question was only in that when there will be X. V>> Who all"? The population Most part understood strictly other - anything with anybody it is not necessary to do, it is necessary not to select simply it again. T> the Vegetable was not going to be re-elected, he as well as Putin wanted to make a show holiday of choices where the people solve nothing. The people for Putin just solve. And here now you precisely solve nothing, to you even more nuts twirled.

46

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, cheerysoft.com, you wrote: CC> Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V>> Who all"? The population Most part understood strictly other - anything with anybody it is not necessary to do, it is necessary not to select simply it again. CC> You, the main thing, here understand that it is necessary to select again, whether and that is not enough of that. Quite could be and such, on that it and democracy. The power take by force when cannot take justly. It is clear that  fly by with whistle on all choices, it is necessary to shoot the at a back on the Maidan.

47

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> All so, you are right. And at opposition the variant: And we already have an opposition? Ops> Image: 7315644.jpg Something at me  is not shown. What there?

48

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, cheerysoft.com, you wrote: CC> Something at me  is not shown. What there? Probably, malicious Putin stole a picture.

49

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> Probably, malicious Putin stole a picture. At what here Putin?

50

Re: Parallels of uproar 2013 and 2017

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: M>> On determination the oligarchy is a capital accrete with the power. About criminality of nothing It is told S> and there is a criminality - to write laws under itself. The criminality is a violation of the law. And you now for some reason in crimes wrote down lawmaking