1

Topic: In the Central Bank see the future

In subject development about conscious destruction of banks of the Central Bank. Here someone justifies the Central Bank and accuses principals of banks. Say in the Central Bank such clever people sit that they can invent parameters which specify in bankruptcy of studied bank in flow of couple of years. So whence in the Central Bank such clever people and why they are not present in real sector undertook? Let they would predict development of the enterprises in real sector on dial-ups of far-fetched parameters and rescued them from bankruptcies. But such is not present. From here it is logical to assume, as in banking sphere there are no such experts and the rules, able to predict falling of banks. And from this it follows that criteria of the Central Bank do not answer the purpose of preventing of banks from ,  the Central Bank purpose - others. Mythical "improvement of banking sphere" - that for ? What these  from the Central Bank do not find a way for improvement of real sector?

2

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, galeta, you wrote: G> That these  from the Central Bank do not find a way for improvement of real sector? The Central Bank has no right to finance manufacture.

3

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, galeta, you wrote: G> But such is not present. From here it is logical to assume, as in banking sphere there are no such experts and the rules, able to predict falling of banks. G> and from this it follows that criteria of the Central Bank do not answer the purpose of preventing of banks from ,  the Central Bank purpose - others. Absolutely not logically. It is possible to invent billion situations when it is obvious that comes  and that it is possible to make with it - absolutely not clearly. Or it is clear, but resources on rescue are not present.

4

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, galeta, you wrote: G> Mythical "improvement of banking sphere" - that for ? Fund of consolidation of banking sector.  Discovery etc. Consolidation Consolidation (from an armor. con - together, solido - I strengthen) - solidifying, join, integration, rallying something (persons, groups, the organizations, movements and other): My judgement such. It is a lot of banks (nearby 500), it is not necessary so much. They are difficult for supervising. That want. Want to reduce all to ten reliable banks in which the correct guys that  to move in the necessary directions on command sit, to control rates under credits, deposits, etc. I.e. actually . Monopoly for banking sector.

5

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, galeta, you wrote: G> In subject development about conscious destruction of banks of the Central Bank. Here spoke that banks too much, and about copying from the West much. And I including. Here, I not the supporter of stupid copying, but am many things which in the west were as a polygon for check. What for to go once again on a rake? Here in the Russian Federation it pretty often. At least with the same corks, public transport. You understand, it as Vasja  nails a simple checked hammer. But Kohl told that invents a new super hammer. Also you know that? That Kohl would not invent, all the same most likely its new hammer will differ nothing from Vasinogo. Because the hammer  was sharpened years. And so, it is not necessary to fence anything new, there where the checked old works. In any generated country no more than ten banks. And there too through all it transited, and through  banks including.

6

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, DEMON HOOD, you wrote: DH> the Central Bank has no right to finance manufacture. A question about the people foreseeing the future, generally. Why all these people with super-abilities are only in the Central Bank, but there is no in real sector?

7

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, Dead Down, you wrote: > Here spoke that banks too much, and about copying from the West much. And I including. > Here, I not the supporter of stupid copying, but is many things which in the west were as a polygon for check. What for to go once again on a rake? Here in the Russian Federation it pretty often. At least with the same corks, public transport. It is possible to think, in  problems are solved with corks and parkings. > you Understand, it as Vasja  nails a simple checked hammer. But Kohl told that invents a new super hammer. Also you know that? That Kohl would not invent, all the same most likely its new hammer will differ nothing from Vasinogo. Because the hammer  was sharpened years. Mean efficiency of banks on  clients? What for it is necessary for you, you not the director of bank. > And so, it is not necessary to fence anything new, there where the checked old works. In any generated country no more than ten banks. And there too through all it transited, and through  banks including. In Europe the problem of corks is solved? No. So with what  it is necessary to adopt their methods of struggle against corks. In Israel the terrorism problem is solved? No. So with what  it is necessary to adopt their methods of struggle against corks. In Europe banks enter the negative interest rates under contributions. Want that and at us so was? And after all if there will be few banks they with ease arrange arrangement and enter the negative rates under deposits. I hope you heard and about a problem of 51 % of attack on . I suppose that the restricted number of banks similarly causes problems with instability of banking system. In a case of 500 banks to arrange arrangement rather inconveniently.

8

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, DEMON HOOD, you wrote: G>> That these  from the Central Bank do not find a way for improvement of real sector? DH> the Central Bank has no right to finance manufacture. Where you at the author saw words "to finance manufacture"?

9

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: G>>> That these  from the Central Bank do not find a way for improvement of real sector? DH>> the Central Bank has no right to finance manufacture. Q> where you at the author saw words "to finance manufacture"? And how on another it is possible to improve real sector?

10

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, Dead Down, you wrote: > And so, it is not necessary to fence anything new, there where the checked old works. In any generated country no more than ten banks. And there too through all it transited, and through  banks including. By what was specific the countries it is necessary to be guided?

11

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, DEMON HOOD, you wrote: Q>> Where you at the author saw words "to finance manufacture"? DH> and how on another it is possible to improve real sector? For example to reduce cost of credits. And you really do not know other methods or simply pretend to be?

12

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: Q>>> Where you at the author saw words "to finance manufacture"? DH>> and how on another it is possible to improve real sector? Q> for example to reduce cost of credits. And you really do not know other methods or simply pretend to be? What credits? The Central Bank has no right to finance manufacture.

13

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, A_l_e_x_e_y, you wrote: A __> Hello, Dead Down, you wrote: >> And so, it is not necessary to fence anything new, there where the checked old works. In any generated country no more than ten banks. And there too through all it transited, and through  banks including. A __> On what was specific the countries it is necessary to be guided? If to address to such official sources of the USA as data FDIC (Federal System of Insurance of Contributions) we learn that for January, 2014 in the USA 6891 bank has been registered.

14

Re: In the Central Bank see the future

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> If to address to such official sources of the USA as data FDIC (Federal System of Insurance of Contributions) we learn that for January, 2014 in the USA 6891 bank has been registered.  from which half is not banks.