1

Topic: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: the GARDEN> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z82L0ED … e=youtu.be the GARDEN> but. . Perfectly  all "essence" and film "intention" and as  shows how in heads of Russians pour in this sort of slops. This roller looked  at an amount of people, than watched a film. As you see, Russians have sense of taste and protection against slops. That you will not tell about you and you similar.

2

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: the GARDEN> but. . Perfectly  all "essence" and film "intention" and as  shows how in heads of Russians pour in this sort of slops.  has something to tell for slops in heads of Russians. PS a film - rubbish.

3

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Yes, in Russia often remove  cinema. And it is frequent, unfortunately, on it there are state grants. But it does not mean that such cinema is pleasant to Russians. A horse-radish to itself. On a course underestimated judgement on the Russian spectator. It is pleasantly surprised. Thought earlier that gobbles up any   (though it to a film  the relation has) no shit and does not frown. Pleasantly that was mistaken.

4

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: the GARDEN> means look! The darling look! Statistics or

5

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: the GARDEN> is not present. The GARDEN> for me does not exist the Ukrainian motion-picture. As .

6

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote:> but judging by a roller that I threw the GARDEN, hire successful. Even in  carried the 6 million Budget, 5,8 million hire

7

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: the GARDEN>>> is not pleasant to you, it is pleasant to another.>> On a film "Cyborgs" that you will go? Tell a suitable film will be! The GARDEN> is not present. The GARDEN> for me does not exist the Ukrainian motion-picture. And what Ukrainian for you does not exist? The Car-prom, avia-prom? The state, there, for example?

8

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> And what Ukrainian for you does not exist? The Car-prom, avia-prom? The state, there, for example? A science, medicine, formation. All because of agents .

9

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: the GARDEN>>> means look! The darling look! A>> statistics or  the GARDEN> it in a roller is said, from  that hire very successful. Aha, and mine  products disperse worldwide, as hot pies. Truth I work in scientific research institute which robots for FSB and fighters does By the way, operation is pleasant to me, and pay not bad. I hope that by means of my development  and  becomes a bit less

10

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote:> Yes, in Russia often remove  cinema. And it is frequent, unfortunately, on it there are state grants. But it does not mean that such cinema is pleasant to Russians. K> a horse-radish to itself. On a course underestimated judgement on the Russian spectator. It is pleasantly surprised. Thought earlier that gobbles up any   (though it to a film  the relation has) no shit and does not frown. Pleasantly that was mistaken. Yes it is fine, when it was, that Bondarchuk (and similar) for both cheeks burst?

11

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: the GARDEN>>> is not present. The GARDEN>>> for me does not exist the Ukrainian motion-picture. M>> and what Ukrainian for you does not exist? The Car-prom, avia-prom? The state, there, for example? The GARDEN> all so Good fellow, you are well uncovered. Directly a kaming-miss any. However, your friend  yet so willingly sounds the position, but I hope, all present Ukrainian patriots eventually tell about themselves all

12

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: who where drops To a subject and at whom in a head slops more densely: As usual, the full wide trousers.

13

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: M>> I Hope, what by means of my development  and  GARDEN> there is less it becomes exact not the fascist? No. I work on structures which destroy criminals, instead of not consent population with them

14

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: M>>>> I Hope, what by means of my development  and  GARDEN>>> there is less it becomes exact not the fascist? M>> is not present. I work on structures which destroy criminals, instead of not consent with them the population the GARDEN> well that is not consent with a policy  Ukrainians, yes? No, criminals. Those who kills, plunders, forces, arranges . If it is Ukrainians, also them too

15

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote:> I always told the GARDEN that your figures say lies all time. You not our figure, you at all the figure, .

16

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: M>> I Hope, what by means of my development  and  GARDEN> there is less it becomes exact not the fascist? Not, here all norms. The desire of death to the fascist (and you with  fascists) does not do by its fascist.

17

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: the GARDEN> Probably . So . The GARDEN> But, came across on such here the review To what the sad review... The Stamp on a stamp in length almost in a film. Once such  can, but each time?

18

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

M> Aha, and mine  products disperse worldwide, as hot pies. Truth I work in scientific research institute which robots for FSB and fighters You do it made?

19

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: the GARDEN>>> well that is not consent with a policy  Ukrainians, yes? M>> Is not present, criminals. Those who kills, plunders, forces, arranges . The GARDEN> it is strange, why you  in  do not kill? They just fall under all points. Ridiculous stopping if was not such sad. All saw a photo and video of killed women and children , saw video as valorous wars of light with captured (for example address put on a head a tazik/pan, and  on it feet) and joyfully criminals all the same in  spread this demonstrative basis in the general access, but. And in  - absolutely animals. In compote in hospital for prisoners of war of sugar do not report. In general, much that is that on the Kiev process will be used in demonstrative basis. You here want, that some millions people died or would be killed, and I suggest to destroy one such , but in your judgement I the fascist. Black this white, aha

20

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: V>> Once such  can, but each time? The GARDEN> means the good review. It is necessary to look. Unlike Russians you with pleasure guzzle any slops if they are seasoned at least by imaginary sauce .

21

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: M>> Aha, and mine  products disperse worldwide, as hot pies. Truth I work in scientific research institute which robots for FSB and fighters You do T> [img] T> http://s.newsweek.com/sites/www.newswee … -robot.jpg T> [/img] T> it made? In places it is similar. But I am is specific to this product of the relation had no

22

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, BratGanjubas, you wrote: M>>> I Hope, what by means of my development  and  GARDEN>> there is less it becomes exact not the fascist? BG> not, here all norms. The desire of death to the fascist (and you with  fascists) does not do by its fascist. To you offset from kpublic'. I, truth, yet did not look, thought that it was bandy

23

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, anonymous, you wrote:>> I always told the GARDEN that your figures say lies all time. A> you not our figure, you at all the figure, . So  - too the figure. Though something does

24

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, alsemm, you wrote: A> As usual, the full wide trousers.  wide trousers are full, the fact. Even too much it is a little splashed out. Objection on the second point. Like correct to write - . , you do not know the Jewish language, and use in

25

Re: Re: the Film "Crimea". Again.

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: V>> To what the sad review... V>> the Stamp on a stamp in length almost in a film. V>> once such  can, but each time? The GARDEN> means the good review. It is necessary to look. About Crimea? Look, aha