1

Topic: Strange that here it is not considered

2

Re: Strange that here it is not considered

3

Re: Strange that here it is not considered

Hello, neFormal, you wrote: F> the people worry, because consider that it reach through truncating of the channel for free resources. Or even through introduction of an additional board for access to them. Well or for example from  it will be possible to look at rollers and from  is not present... Simply because so the provider wanted... It is not forbidden F> unless already cancelled? Like  proceeds. Yes -  not that article

4

Re: Strange that here it is not considered

F> it is not global and not . F> an essence that providers can give privileges to certain clients. For example, to give it is more than throughput of the channel to paid video-hostings. F> the people worry, because consider that it reach through truncating of the channel for free resources. Or even through introduction of an additional board for access to them. And still this innovation can lay down large corporations and startups in unequal conditions. Unequal as regards availability of the traffic. And it is bad.

5

Re: Strange that here it is not considered

Hello, neFormal, you wrote: F> it is not global and not . F> an essence that providers can give privileges to certain clients. For example, to give it is more than throughput of the channel to paid video-hostings. F> the people worry, because consider that it reach through truncating of the channel for free resources. Or even through introduction of an additional board for access to them. And you with these are not consent? The exclusive traffic will go on  to channels?

6

Re: Strange that here it is not considered

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: F>> it is not global and not . F>> an essence that providers can give privileges to certain clients. For example, to give it is more than throughput of the channel to paid video-hostings. F>> the people worry, because consider that it reach through truncating of the channel for free resources. Or even through introduction of an additional board for access to them. M> And you with these are not consent? The exclusive traffic will go on  to channels? M> with what it do not agree and at what here channels?

7

Re: Strange that here it is not considered