151

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: Q> Not to mention that it calculates inflation by rather disputable image. Inflation is a depreciation of rouble. Inflation is an index of a post of consumer prices. A phrase "rouble depreciation" about what. Q> Result is rise in prices. Rise in prices it also is inflation. Q> the Central Bank considers rise in prices by inflation determination. So consider all but you. Q> actually the rise in prices reasons can be and others - reduction of a sentence of the goods for any reasons, the seasonal factor, a dollar rate increase owing to reduction of its inflow. Certainly inflation can have many reasons. For example, one of them rouble depreciation in relation to foreign currencies - falling of a rouble exchange rate and as consequence  in roubles of import consumer goods. Reduction of a sentence of the goods too can cause inflation. Q> at calculation it does not consider the Central Bank and when in August the prices for vegetables speaks about inflation reduction and when in the winter in shops there are hothouse vegetables are reduced, speaks about magnification. Though actually it is the different goods - soil, hothouse And what? In the summer of the price decrease  because of the seasonal factor but if inflation for a year interests and take it following the results of a year, there and seasonally lowering will be considered also seasonal increase. Q> and import should not participate in calculations at all as have to rouble no any relation. Would not have the relation if Russians would buy them not for roubles, and for currency and not in the Russian shop, and in the market in Honduras. Q> as a result in 2014 year when  dollar, Nabiullina declared inflation. Though actually no inflation (in sense of depreciation of rouble) existed, there was only a dollar rise in price, and as almost all goods at us import their prices rose. That is you suggest to redefine the term according to your imaginations on a subject and will be all happiness! In the evening DEMON HOOD c "" and even "" determination of rate of return not concerning a reality, since morning you with this idea. Cheerfully!... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

152

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> in the Evening DEMON HOOD c "" and even "" determination of rate of return not concerning a reality, since morning you with this idea. Cheerfully! Hallo, expensive, just by radio told that one loony goes on . Be more careful. - one??? Yes them here thousand!

153

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, DEMON HOOD, you wrote: DH> DH> Hallo, expensive, just by radio told that one loony goes on . Be more careful. - one??? Yes them here thousand! Reading "Capital" and without understanding neither the content, nor its ratio with a reality  such lonely to become.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

154

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, pagid, you wrote: DH>> DH>> Hallo, expensive, just by radio told that one loony goes on . Be more careful. - one??? Yes them here thousand! P> reading "Capital" and without understanding neither the content, nor its ratio with a reality  such lonely to become. It you on .  with perception at you

155

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> well apprx. hammer on the forecast, there there was an information about 2014 and 2015 i.e. when it already happened. On 2015 there just the forecast. Not especially come true. Even in spite of the fact that became in September.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

156

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, TimurSPB, you wrote: I Answer TSP> who Looked? Can there was all the same something interesting? Looked. Anything it was not especially interesting. TSP> the president still did not bother you? No, our president did not bother us. Therefore we also select our president.

157

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, TimurSPB, you wrote: ES>> it had ESPECIALLY BORING conference! TSP> it not so unless? Once again a question: whether it is the clown that to you? You want    to Ukraine, to Kiev...

158

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

MZ> Is not present, our president did not bother us. MZ> therefore we also select our president. You good fellows!

159

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

MZ> Once again a question: whether it is the clown that to you? You are a little . on a question did not answer MZ> Want    to Ukraine, to Kiev... At us and the is not worse

160

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, Lazy Bear, you wrote: LB> forum Rules forbid cavils to spelling. So in vain you raised here this song about Russian. Lazy Bear, at you in an eye the big log, but you it, as well as are necessary to the operator of an armored train, do not note. So was with your passage to arguing of my person which you "did not note". But as soon as I in the answer expressed yours so you started singing at once "why all  like you such rested and hardly that, become personal?" . In the same way with cavils to spelling. At first you carped at my spelling - "to begin with at least start to write without errors" - and as soon as received in the answer the same coin, again  - "forum rules are broken"! Free council: track first of all the manners and errors. I answer by a principle "what question, the answer" is that also. Wanted to show off - expect the symmetric response. ARK>> errors here, for example, you can find itself? Errors at itself found, "writing without errors"? LB> And you of successful searches! LB> ARK> you it is casual on zodiac sign not  be? ARK>> and Russian not the native can for you? Yes, here commas agree, passed. Has been assured that both variants are possible, but now looked at dictionaries - really without commas it is impossible.

161

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, pagid, you wrote: Q>> Not to mention that it calculates inflation by rather disputable image. Inflation is a depreciation of rouble. P> inflation is an index of a post of consumer prices. A phrase "rouble depreciation" about what. This phrase about reduction of the price of rouble. And as he is used for an estimation of the goods rouble depreciation expresses in rise in prices for all goods. A word all"here key because rise in prices for the separate goods (vegetables in the spring or import at dollar growth) inflation is not. Q>> result is rise in prices. P> rise in prices it also is inflation. No. No. Once again there is no Q>> a Central Bank considers rise in prices by inflation determination. P> so consider all but you. So people consider, it is cleverer not only me, but also Nabiullina. http://www.libertarium.ru/lib_thinking_15 inflation is not growth of cost of life. An inflation essence - falling of value or purchasing capacity of money. On the other hand, it is possible to tell that inflation is an increase of money prices of the blessings. It is possible even if want, to speak about inflation as about increase of monetary cost of life. But a keyword is money. Real cost of a two-dollar hamburger this year is no more, than a dollar hamburger in the past if costs of acquisition of dollar decreased since last year twice. Costs of acquisition something are value of that, than it is necessary to renounce, that it to acquire. We so got used to express value of possibilities which we sacrifice, through the general monetary measuring instrument that sometimes we forget to check up, whether value of the measuring instrument changed. But so happens during inflation. It not magnification of the size of all things, and reduction of length of a ruler which we use. Q>> Actually the rise in prices reasons can be and others - reduction of a sentence of the goods for any reasons, the seasonal factor, a dollar rate increase owing to reduction of its inflow. P> Certainly inflation can have many reasons. At rise in prices. P> for example, one of them rouble depreciation in relation to foreign currencies - falling of a rouble exchange rate and as consequence  in roubles of import consumer goods. Reduction of a sentence of the goods too can cause inflation. The rise in prices reason. Because only separate goods rise in price thus. And at inflation all goods rise in price, and - that also is important - the salary. At growth of dollar the salary does not change, can even falls. At reduction of a sentence of the goods too - unless except those who produces these goods. Q>> and import should not participate in calculations at all as have to rouble no any relation. P> P> would not have the relation if Russians would buy them not for roubles, and for currency and not in the Russian shop, and in the market in Honduras. Dollars have no to inflation the slightest relation. The dollar is one of thousand goods and if it rose in price to inflation it has even the smaller relation, than a spring rise in price of vegetables.

162

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: LB>> forum Rules forbid cavils to spelling. So in vain you raised here this song about Russian. ARK> Lazy Bear, at you in an eye the big log, but you it, as well as are necessary to the operator of an armored train, do not note. And it is possible without epithets and guessings simply finger to show? As where I am is specific I do not note? ARK> so was with your passage to arguing of my person which you "did not note". But as soon as I in the answer expressed yours so you started singing at once "why all  like you such rested and hardly that, become personal?". It where you tried to guess what for about my zodiac sign? About, it there was such passage to the person that I after that cried. Two times If compared me to the powerful athlete I would tell:" Thanks, of course, but you flatter me ", instead of took offense not clearly on what, as some ARK> In the same way with cavils to spelling. At first you carped at my spelling -" to begin with at least start to write without errors "- and as soon as received in the answer the same coin, again  -" forum rules are broken "! Here to you a reference to the source and even the citation therefrom, for your convenience: http://rsdn.org/forum/flame.politics/6994978.1 the Author: AlexRK Date: 15.12 18:59 ARK> And Russian not the native can for you? Then much explains this. You once again did not guess.  - predictability To begin with at least start to write without errors, and then come out with the erratic assumptions of space scale. So who the first raised a song about language ignorance? Stand, I know! Now you will answer that your guessing about" nonnative Russian "- not the cavil to spelling, therefore is not considered. Yes? And your insult of strangers which you do not consider as an insult - not an insult. I remember it "Wanted to show off - expect the symmetric response." () you ARK> If speech about Putin I offended it, I offend and I will offend henceforth while this  does not leave on the deserved rest (it is desirable on prison plank beds). At last you admitted in obvious. And so tried... ARK> Free council: track first of all the manners and errors. I answer by a principle "what question, the answer" is that also. Wanted to show off - expect the symmetric response. Just about. ARK> errors at itself found, "writing without errors"? Yes. Unless I said, what I write without errors? Cannot be! The citation in studio! ARK> yes, commas here agree, passed. Has been assured that both variants are possible, but now looked at dictionaries - really without commas it is impossible. And not only commas, gy-gy. So I wish you in New year of less self-confidence... In all

163

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Gentlemen, can you continue  each other in ?

164

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

165

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> This your private affair how to react to arguing of your person. And on others the habits do not need to be transferred. And I ARK> You know about the same, what such spelling? Yes. And you? LB>> stand, I know! Now you will answer that your guessing about "nonnative Russian" - not the cavil to spelling, therefore is not considered. Yes? ARK> Look, itself guessed. You are predicted. And here your guessings fly strictly by. ARK> I anywhere did not say that it not an insult. It was an insult, but an essence of my post at all in an insult. ARK>>> if speech about Putin I offended it, I offend and I will offend henceforth while this  does not leave on the deserved rest (it is desirable on prison plank beds). LB>> at last you admitted in obvious. And so tried... ARK> These phrases carry the same sense. And it at all in an insult and not in appearance. Though at first two variants there is an insult. And in last two are not present. ARK> it is interesting, how many it is necessary iterations to inform this simple thought... Yes get out how many you want, it does not change an essence. ARK>>> errors at itself found, "writing without errors"? LB>> Yes. Unless I said, what I write without errors? Cannot be! The citation in studio! ARK> well, time carped at my spelling, "the authoritative" judgement means have. It is terrible to present your response when to you say that at you the lace was decoupled ARK> Except commas, errors are not present. Well-well ARK> that you consider as "error" - intended distortion. And what I consider as such error?

166

Re: Vladimir Putin's especially boring press conference

Hello, TimurSPB, you wrote: TSP> Gentlemen, can you continue  each other in ? I even would tell, as here it is not necessary to do it. I for world peace.