1

Topic: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Recently transited news about swerving of our development of railway rocket complexes. This aggressive step of the Russian soldiery could not remain without the adequate answer from world predominant force. As the strong answer course Americans displace operations on "fashionable"  HVP: News on . News on Task and Purpose. The race flywheel  continues to be untwisted

2

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, 0x7be, you wrote: 0> the race flywheel  by Relsotron from the very beginning turbid Continues to be untwisted was. It is known that at similar thingummies the lowest efficiency and other problems a heap. Otherwise for a long time already companions into an orbit  .

3

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, 3V, you wrote: 3V> Relsotron from the very beginning turbid was. 3V> it is known that at similar thingummies the lowest efficiency and other problems a heap. It still looking, as efficiency to consider. Efficiency of mastering of budgets at such projects simply smart!

4

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, 0x7be, you wrote: 0> the race flywheel  Well Continues to be untwisted and it is good.

5

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, ML380, you wrote: ML> Hello, 0x7be, you wrote: 0>> the race flywheel  ML> Well Continues to be untwisted and it is good. It is a joke. Simply about that  is pure drank - all some supporters of the American terrorists  that knew many years ago, but it  something significant.

6

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, 0x7be, you wrote: 0> This aggressive step of the Russian soldiery could not remain without the adequate answer from world predominant force. 0> as the strong answer course Americans displace operations on "fashionable"  HVP: the Pancake, and  so in it trusted! 0> news on . Oh, something is not trusted by me to this source. And somewhere on made resources this news jumped?

7

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, 3V, you wrote: 3V> It is known that at similar thingummies the lowest efficiency and other problems a heap. 3V> differently for a long time already companions into an orbit  . By the way, in an orbit from them I pound would be more, if, of course, on other companions to shoot.

8

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> By the way, in an orbit from them I pound would be more, if, of course, on other companions to shoot. Only where there sources  such capacity to take... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

9

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

VD>> By the way, in an orbit from them I pound would be more, if, of course, on other companions to shoot. P> only where there sources  such capacity It not to take important, especially if this idea to inform to the Mask (sends Tesla into an orbit and all the problem is solved)

10

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> the Pancake, and  so in it trusted! And in the laser trusted This gun becomes good addition to a 60-milliard briefcase of futuristic projects of the weapon which have been cancelled

11

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, 0x7be, you wrote: 0> Recently transited news about swerving of our development of railway rocket complexes. 0> this aggressive step of the Russian soldiery could not remain without the adequate answer from world predominant force. 0> as the strong answer course Americans displace operations on "fashionable"  HVP: really bad news. It is so much  the American tax bearers still could saw and all came to an end. Now, who knows, for something harmful spend.

12

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, the Laid-back person, you wrote: really bad news. It is so much  the American tax bearers still could saw and all came to an end. Now, who knows, for something harmful spend. Anything, at them still F-35 and Zumvolt is.

13

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, 3V, you wrote: 3V> Relsotron from the very beginning turbid was. 3V> it is known that at similar thingummies the lowest efficiency and other problems a heap. 3V> differently for a long time already companions into an orbit  . It if the companion stuffing does not turn to garbage from acceleration in many G.

14

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, Hobbes, you wrote: H> It if the companion stuffing does not turn to garbage from acceleration in many G. It is possible to shoot  very small in comparison with the fighting companion. The main thing to get to the enemy. But here with can get to be problems that small that the big shells.

15

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> It is possible to shoot  very small in comparison with the fighting companion. The main thing to get to the enemy. But here with can get to be problems that small that the big shells. I about an output of companions to an orbit, instead of an output out of operation companions in an orbit. By the way, how there the controlled artillery shell lives? Still one million for a shot?

16

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, Hobbes, you wrote: H> I about an output of companions to an orbit, instead of an output out of operation companions in an orbit. From "Guns on the Moon" Well theoretically if a trunk to make sticking out for limits of dense beds of atmosphere as here someone offered (laughed), it is possible and to use for an output, well if to construct... Overshot, you thought to Vlad http://rsdn.org/forum/flame.politics/6987954.1 the Author: VladD2 Date: 08.12 00:14

17

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, 3V, you wrote: 3V> Differently for a long time already companions into an orbit  . Reached today  speed - only 8 km/s, after atmosphere run it will be noticeable less so does not fly up.

18

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> Reached today  speed - only 8 km/s, after atmosphere run it will be noticeable less so does not fly up. About the companion forgot? At least 7,9 at the companion. It is possible to shoot so that it was added. But there is other problem: it is necessary that the shell about atmosphere was not abraded on such speeds))

19

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, 3V, you wrote: 3V> Relsotron from the very beginning turbid was. As well as the submarine from the titan. Nevertheless, many operating time under the project 661 afterwards have been used at creation of other submarines.

20

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, Skorodum, you wrote:> really bad news. It is so much  the American tax bearers still could saw and all came to an end. Now, who knows, for something harmful spend. S> anything, at them still F-35 and Zumvolt is. At one Zumvolta the amount starting somewhere is comparable to an amount of all our calibres. I.e. on it it is not enough of them, but distinction not in tens times even. At one ship.

21

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> At one Zumvolta the amount starting somewhere is comparable to an amount of all our calibres. 1. It is true if to speak only about surface calibres and today.  at us is still underwater,  and aviation. 2. To Sense from them, if first Zumvolt a year under repair. To push starting though where not a problem, though on the barge. N> I.e. on it it is not enough of them, but distinction not in tens times even. At one ship. Working horsies of fleet of the USA it is Berks, and Zumvolt drank it.

22

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, Hobbes, you wrote: H> By the way how there the controlled artillery shell lives? Still one million for a shot? From a normal gun? I think strongly more cheaply since  we in Syria used recently.

23

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> That? Speech about, that  the companion into an orbit. Reaching on the earth of all 8km/with it does not take off in any way from atmosphere with space speed, and departs on a ballistic path.    ( ) - minimum (for the given height over a planet surface) speed which it is necessary to give to object that it made driving on a circle orbit round a planet [1]. The first space speed for an orbit allocated near to a surface of the Earth, makes 7,91 km/s

24

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> S> Pervaja   ( ) - minimum (for the given height over a planet surface) speed which it is necessary to give to object that it made driving on a circle orbit round a planet [1]. The first space speed for an orbit allocated near to a surface of the Earth, makes 7,91 km/s Taking off from a trunk of a gun with a speed about a shell very quickly loses it in atmosphere.

25

Re: [] the Answer of the Pentagon on Russian

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> S> Pervaja   ( ) - minimum (for the given height over a planet surface) speed which it is necessary to give to object that it made driving on a circle orbit round a planet [1]. The first space speed for an orbit allocated near to a surface of the Earth, makes 7,91 km/s I about it and I speak. The subject which has been let out from the earth with speed hardly more 1 space, loses the most part of speed on the way to atmosphere and as a result plops down, instead of orbits.