1

Topic: About extinction and the price for habitation

2

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> in general a short question. Why people in Ukraine ever less, the power  as can. Transcription do not lead, but according to some information us left about 35 million, a maximum 40. Thus the prices for habitation and for the earth did not reach level of 2000 year. Why? S> Why people continue to pay money for habitation in a concentration camp? Because differently it is nothing the fat Proprietor the Big Black Jeep will contain.

3

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> in general a short question. Why people in Ukraine ever less, the power  as can. Transcription do not lead, but according to some information us left about 35 million, a maximum 40. Thus the prices for habitation and for the earth did not reach level of 2000 year. Why? Probably, then all the same was worse S> Why people continue to pay money for habitation in a concentration camp? And continue? What percent of made transactions to total of sentences?

4

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > it is visible, then all the same was worse > Image: 1481664384.jpg It of that, already and for 5 years forward gross national products defined? It I to that it is necessary at once on  to send such schedules, it is not necessary to look at all, whether checked digits fight.

5

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> It of that, already and for 5 years forward gross national products defined? The forecast can be ignored safely - it does not concern a subject Ops> It I to that it is necessary at once on  to send such schedules yes all right simply it is a unique picture which I found with 2000 and 2017  simultaneously Ops> it is not necessary to look at all, whether checked digits fight. Fight

6

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > yes it is fine > simply it is a unique picture which I found with 2000 and 2017  simultaneously It is possible to take crude digits and to construct. Can be even faster, than search for pictures. > fight Well here somehow it would not be desirable to check.

7

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> in general a short question. Why people in Ukraine ever less, the power  as can. Transcription do not lead, but according to some information us left about 35 million, a maximum 40. Thus the prices for habitation and for the earth did not reach level of 2000 year. Why? In 2000 year of the price were too low. And about that that the prices for habitation pick-up fell I some times heard. And about that that now it became easier to programmer to buy apartment - too. S> Why people continue to pay money for habitation in a concentration camp? Well, why? If you noted, even at this forum many .

8

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> In 2000 year of the price were too low. And about that that the prices for habitation pick-up fell I some times heard. And about that that now it became easier to programmer to buy apartment - too. You generally consider seriously old five-storey apartment blocks where it is audible even as the neighbor ? It not habitation. For me remains paradox as people generally are ready to pay for them something. Them free of charge produced as housing problem makeshift. But after all buy... What for? Not clearly. To live in them any pleasure. The unique sense - type that after operation to have a sleep and again on operation. S>> why people continue to pay money for habitation in a concentration camp? VD> well, why? If you noted, even at this forum many . So... Left,  - and the prices all the same not waste.

9

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

S> in general a short question. Why people in Ukraine ever less, the power  as can. Transcription do not lead, but according to some information us left about 35 million, a maximum 40. Thus the prices for habitation and for the earth did not reach level of 2000 year. Why? S> Why people continue to pay money for habitation in a concentration camp? The answer detailed was at one future methods of upholding (can be to wind off hardly back from link time) are predicted Is chewed

10

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> and the prices all the same not the waste. It you, probably, want to buy. If sold - would understand that  the waste. The meanness law.

11

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, alexsmirnoff, you wrote: A> It you, probably, want to buy. A> if sold - would understand that  the waste. A> the meanness law. Well look. Five-storey apartment blocks, for example, free of charge distributed as temporal habitation + now still it is necessary for municipal to pay. How many it can cost? Well, a maximum 1 year of the average salary. That is 12 * $350 = $4200. That is that year worked as the seller, for the salary of the wife live the second postpone - and to you conceded the  habitation which received free of charge. Same not for elite habitation, truly? And just for temporary barracks for most  workers.

12

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

S> How many it can cost? Well, a maximum 1 year of the average salary. It in what textbook on economy is written?

13

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

And you sell or buy? I to that that it is necessary not only to study sentences but also demand, and it is better real transactions.

14

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Why? Because people from village in cities get over. Accordingly in cities of reduction is not present.

15

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Well look. Five-storey apartment blocks, for example, free of charge distributed as temporal habitation + now still it is necessary for municipal to pay. Them not absolutely free of charge distributed. Simply so habitation did not give to whom: or queue on improving of conditions, or from the enterprise. Still, by the way, cooperative societies were, where all  for the, but with . A grant. Formally - yes, tenants money directly did not pay. Actually is there was such form of payment / . Validities. S> how many it can cost? Well, a maximum 1 year of the average salary. Whence such digit? S> and you conceded the  habitation which received free of charge. Are ready to be engaged in such charity?

16

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> in general a short question. Why people IN Ukraine ever less, the power  as can. Transcription do not lead, but according to some information us left about 35 million, a maximum 40. Thus the prices for habitation and for the earth did not reach level of 2000 year. Why? Because you do not protect neither nor wide trousers... You compare the prices for apartments in Kiev to an amount of people in Ukraine! Therefore at you to converge nothing... Though to whom I explain it...  a ladle on a pan and business the end. https://agent.ua/statistics/?s=0&d= … erval=year Poltava, Odessa, Nikolaev-30 % for this Vinnitsa, Dnepropetrovsk, Khmelnitskiy, Chernovtsy from-10 % to-20 %. In Kiev the price did not exchange almost. Here  across Kharkov - http://domik.ua/nedvizhimost/dinamika-cen.html One thousand dollars for 1 sq. m. Muscovites look at you as a cat on ... And it not the smallest city on the globe of Ukraine. !

17

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Muxa, you wrote: M> It in what textbook on economy is written? For most ...

18

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Andrey Baboshin, you wrote: > Them not absolutely free of charge distributed. > it is simple so habitation did not give to whom: > or queue on improving of conditions, And it that is not free? Standing in queue of that that costed? > or from the enterprise. Similarly. > Still, by the way, cooperative societies were, where all  for the, but with . A grant. Well . Cooperative also will cost more expensively. Hardly it is five-storey apartment blocks.

19

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> And it that is not free? Standing in queue of that that costed? Other variants was not

20

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Hello, Andrey Baboshin, you wrote: In my opinion, the dichotomy paid/free habitation in application to the USSR is not meaningful, if at all is possible (except for cooperative societies). Absence of the free market + only allocation (instead of habitation sale) on the basis of certain criteria is . As a board were used not . Signs, and points which could be earned or by accumulation .  (children / all is bad/something else), or a length of service at the enterprise. It is time. Two - privatization (I so understand that in Ukraine habitation privatization transited/transits on  with the Russian circuit) in which result the habitation appeared in the property. The Item With. I will repeat a question are ready to be engaged in charity and to sell habitation "free of charge got in the USSR for average annual wages?

21

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Well look. Five-storey apartment blocks, for example, free of charge distributed as temporal habitation + now still it is necessary for municipal to pay. How many it can cost? Well, a maximum 1 year of the average salary. That is 12 * $350 = $4200. That is that year worked as the seller, for the salary of the wife live the second postpone - and to you conceded the  habitation which received free of charge. Same not for elite habitation, truly? And just for temporary barracks for most  workers. Whence such assumptions? I read saw such estimation that the habitation costs about 100 averages  on terrain. Estimated - similar on truth, though for London, though for Muhosranska

22

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Whence such assumptions? He lives in the own Universe.

23

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> I read saw such estimation that the habitation costs about 100 averages  on terrain. Estimated - similar on truth, though for London though for Muhosranska New - it is possible. But not the five-storey apartment block,  is constructed as temporal social habitation. Their working life quitted for a long time.

24

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Muxa, you wrote: M> It in what textbook on economy is written? Purely psychologically. Well, on old social habitation where each bunch and which working life is audible for a long time quitted - well year still it is possible . Lives there are not present it is pure a box which allows you not to die in the street and to continue to work. 100 salaries as here spoke - well, it is possible to spend for new habitation.

25

Re: About extinction and the price for habitation

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> in general a short question. Why people in Ukraine ever less, the power  as can. Transcription do not lead, but according to some information us left about 35 million, a maximum 40. Thus the prices for habitation and for the earth did not reach level of 2000 year. Why? Well here it is possible to try to apply all the same traveled all over law of demand-offer. If habitation built in great volumes, the sentence would grow also the drop prices (actually generally it not so because of others economic and not economic aspects, but nevertheless...). If habitation do not build, there are it  => prices do not fall. If habitation not to build as early as years 40, the prices still grow (shabby habitation will quit a turn). Truth then it becomes an attractive niche for business and there goes  => the prices in due course fall.