26

Re: The source code on # got to me, and I studied only With ++. There is a fast method to be cut?

wrote:

Look here (below still article) and in further here

Thanks! That the doctor registered!
I, by the way, stopped on the pocket reference manual # from O'reilly. There only 250 small pages so it turns out compressed, and during too time the full help.

27

Re: The source code on # got to me, and I studied only With ++. There is a fast method to be cut?

SashaMercury wrote:

what for to read inscriptions on fences, the rating is better to look using TIOBE, and separately the taken country not the most good index

Very disputable rating.  some factors changing the real data:
1. If language difficult in a rating it will be uprated.
2. If language is used by beginners in a rating it will be uprated (not all started to program remain in this branch).
3. If language use in educational institutions the rating will be uprated.
4. If language is little-known, it will actively study also a rating will be uprated.
Etc.

SashaMercury wrote:

By the way why you do not want to add API to library on C#? Too small piece is necessary to you or it works not so quickly how you would like?

Because the small part of library is necessary to me and it would not be desirable to drag with itself a heap of stuff only because did not understand that is necessary, and that is not present.

28

Re: The source code on # got to me, and I studied only With ++. There is a fast method to be cut?

[spoiler offtopic]

AlekseySQL wrote:

it is passed...
Very disputable rating.  some factors changing the real data:
1. If language difficult in a rating it will be uprated
2. If language is used by beginners in a rating it will be uprated (not all started to program remain in this branch).
3. If language use in educational institutions the rating will be uprated.
4. If language is little-known, it will actively study also a rating will be uprated.
Etc.

1. You think, what an amount of requests of type "That such ?" In a network above than "How to cook rice?" Or "how to create an one-dimensional array?" wink
2,3. These  do not prove the validity of your thesis above.
4. 18 place TIOBE language Scratch. Personally I do not have any desire to study it. In spite of the fact that I know about it a little.
Anything disputable as you speak, in it is not present, it such - what is.

https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/programming-languages-definition/ wrote:

The TIOBE Programming Community index is an indicator of the popularity of programming languages. The index is updated once a month. The ratings are based on the number of skilled engineers world-wide, courses and third party vendors. Popular search engines such as Google, Bing, Yahoo!, Wikipedia, Amazon, YouTube and Baidu are used to calculate the ratings. It is important to note that the TIOBE index is not about the best programming language or the language in which most lines of code have been written.
The index can be used to check whether your programming skills are still up to date or to make a strategic decision about what programming language should be adopted when starting to build a new software system. The definition of the TIOBE index can be found here.

I quote article, the link on which you specified above

https://dou.ua/lenta/articles/language-rating-jan-2017/ wrote:

the Most widespread language still remains Java (23 % of the market), JavaScript quitted on the second place (16 %), slightly outstripping C# on popularity. On 4th place, as before, - PHP (13 %) with the big lift-off from Python (7 %). C programming ++ occupies 5 % of the market, further go Ruby (4.5 %), Swift and Objective-C. Shorts ten the most popular languages - Scala (1.5 %), outstripping a C and 1C.

Confuses the text in which languages With and 1 are enumerated with usage of the union "and". I remember, for a long time suggested to rename Community on / ++. It was wrong, it was necessary to ask to rename on /1/ ++:D Certainly it is a joke, it is possible that rating it is useful, as I am primary did not note the analysis of all assembled data from users on it more low.
[/spoiler]

29

Re: The source code on # got to me, and I studied only With ++. There is a fast method to be cut?

[spoiler offtopic]

SashaMercury wrote:

Confuses the text in which languages With and 1 are enumerated with usage of the union "and".

And why in section "In what language you write for operation now?" They cannot stand together? The first cannot be used for writing of the modern software, for the second the separate interlayer of firms - , engaged in product implementation is created.
[/spoiler]

30

Re: The source code on # got to me, and I studied only With ++. There is a fast method to be cut?

AlekseySQL wrote:

There is a fast method to be cut?

Is not present. I here couple of months worked on , truth in Xamarin, but not strongly changes an essence. Many things should be studied simply. It does not turn out so, to make quickly an application template in a wizard, and then (being able to work with With ++) to fill it out of need.  were repelled from Java, but then wound much the that strongly distinguishes  even from , I am silent already about pluses. Nevertheless, the person writing on pluses, can always understand and investigate for reasonable time.