And as it is connected "" to arguing of comparative compressibility (a pliability to compression) lines (messages) of type resulted by you
Ivan, do not carp, at me a habit to answer the adjacent questions as you too juggle, happens, terms "with ease unusual".
It is connected, that it was remembered or caused arguing. The message presumably encoded exactly one bit of the information intended for the Customer (true). The distorted phrase as a result "" gives our way NULL, those , i.e. absence expected for the Customer, and it is necessary to repeat transmission. Both there, and there 1 bit, and lengths of the files which have left in an ether, different was encoded. The idea of an example was in it. It agree that lines are not so indicative.
The information for the Customer - consisted in it mine . Unlike the information for a communication channel, as a matter of fact - from length of a transmittable file. And, by the way, if to sign ', the line after all is extended? (It is admissible, I signed simply from instead of to certify myself)
I repeat, talks about - while it is all .