Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> Hello, indee, you wrote: I>> Mirrorless P> P> why? The answer consists in the total which the author of a post is ready to pay for the camera. Now, though, and is more expensive than the colleagues, but it is really wonderful technics, in all aspects. I do not want to argue or , there is no sense... mirrorless, it is evolution to what the photoindustry moves. That is important for the modern camera and qualitative pictures: , the photosensitive element (matrix) and electronics which controls it. And the mirror, this simply constructional decision in which canikon put the large totals as lost the market warming up obvious disputes. At first, I as the person of "old school" was skeptical to , yes, spent, many resources on light, and bright optics for a mirror, but progress not on a place... Hasselblad and that leaves in . P.S. Recently watched of operation of one photographer which removes the wooden camera on glass plates. On one picture 5-7 minutes, the whole luggage carrier of "arms" leave, the wife accurately submits "" and carries away "shot".