51

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, indee, you wrote: I> Now though,  and is more expensive than the colleagues, but it is really wonderful technics, in all aspects. I> I do not want to argue or , there is no sense... mirrorless, it is evolution to what the photoindustry moves. And without slogans?

52

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> Fudzhik Among  in a price category 50 - 110  have the most light whale lenses: 2,8-4  3,5-5,6 at all remaining. Not including steams-triples of models with fixes.

53

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

P> On Nikon D750  good discounts in the nearest photographic supplies store. P> as the device? It is necessary to take? Anybody?

54

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> That think, colleagues? Recalling with heat convenient and qualitative Nikon D40 with a lens 1.8 35mm, I think about here such: http://www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/x100t.htm As addition to leaking Pentax K50 + 17-50mm 2.8 Both for any house shooting, children, in a trip, etc. the Unique minus for me 35mm ASP-C can be  for many situations, and in the whole super situations for the majority

55

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, Tyomchik, you wrote: Those> Choose your poison. The size of a sensor control matters. You will take   or sleepyheads krop - quality will be comparable and even identical. The difference in weight 150-200 is leveled, when will throw out  in  and will wind a normal fix + the polarizable filter. Sensor controls for  does sleepyheads. Qualities  to me for eyes but if aim - to be the first guy on village, then sleepyheads  - only option. Than  it is better than the sleepyhead  ?

56

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

J> that is, actually, these lenses stand copecks and the price are dictated by greed - at the sleepyhead it more... Poor laws of physics... Where you here saw physics? Normal economy.

57

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, SkyDance, you wrote: J>> that is, actually, these lenses stand copecks and the price are dictated by greed - at the sleepyhead it more... Poor laws of physics... SD> Where you here saw physics? Normal economy. Where-where - on the globe. Cheap lenses - they for , the a matrix , the lenses are cheaper. And for  they expensive and  a mirror does not do them more cheaply and less and easier.

58

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, Vetal_ca, you wrote: V _> Recalling with heat convenient and qualitative Nikon D40 with a lens 1.8 35mm, I think about here such: V _> http://www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/x100t.htm the Device cool, but it is not clear as works declared phase . For example indoors, at the mixed artificial lighting, sometimes starts to carry slowly focusing. Because of it running children to remove heavy. Can it is time update an insertion, something for a long time did not check. And in remaining all is excellent.

59

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> Than sleepyheads  it is better  ? The price engineers of the Sleepyhead the unique could in ergonomics and convenience. Plus   lenses. And so at Nikona excellent dynamic range and fast algorithms of an auto focus.

60

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: Those>> but if aim - to be the first guy on village, then sleepyheads  - only option. P> Than sleepyheads  it is better  ? Tyominoj unrequited love to the sleepyhead it is More anything. The optics expensive, assortment is more modest. Impressed  . Whether the canon is not able to do economic , whether the element basis for 10 years fine promoted (and me I  can be thrown out). I watch, as mummy-photocountess in a kindergarten on morning performances scorches  in a ceiling without a stop and without change of accumulators. Pictures turn out excellent, accumulators suffice at an o'clock of the continuous shooting (some honeycombs of frames). The camera at it just D750.

61

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

SVZ> the Camera at it just D750. 750  currently the best camera for the majority (it is eliminated certain pro-requirements). As it is reflected in many reviews, ratings and recommendations.

62

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> As the device? It is necessary to take? The device one of the best at present, despite that that not so new... As early as more many years will be more than it is actual. If it is necessary FF  to take precisely costs.

63

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, SkyDance, you wrote: SD> 750  currently the best camera for the majority (it is eliminated certain pro-requirements). An auto focus for video absolutely nasty? Can  in following (the approaching?) models.

64

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

EP> the Auto focus for video absolutely nasty? Can  in following (the approaching?) models. I will find it difficult to answer, the photo-camera is necessary to me for a photo.

65

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

P> Actually, subj. Took 750th carcass and a couple of lenses. While it is pleasant

66

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> Took 750th carcass and a couple of lenses. While it is pleasant we Wait the photoreport. And what lenses?

67

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> And what lenses? Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2

68

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, jhfrek, you wrote: J> and what pluses at  if to leave with the fairy tale side about them ostensibly the smaller size? And what, they it is not less unless? Weight besides. I on Nex sit, me of norms. Though  also was never.

69

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, sambl4, you wrote: S> And what, they is not less unless? Weight besides. I on Nex sit, me of norms. Though  also was never. On  to the account - it is not less. Physics you will not deceive, a lens on the size and weight all equal same. And the good lens weighs more than the heaviest mirror carcass, not to mention the size. So talks about easier weight is a pure marketing. Conditionally, the complete set  - 3-4 if to collect analog on   that total saving in weight will be the order 100-150... Even not ridiculously.

70

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, Tyomchik, you wrote: Those> the Unique lack of this carcass before the sleepyhead - it certainly weight. Hands to swing. Sony 9a - Approx. 673 g Nikon 750 - Approx. 750 g It will be pumped up - a fuck-up as, on the whole 77 gram of a difference... Especially considering that one set of lenses of not less than two kilograms.

71

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 On wide angle at  is absolutely fantastic 14-24 2.8... If it is necessary to remove  it is direct very much I recommend)

72

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, IB, you wrote: IB> So talks about easier weight is a pure marketing. Conditionally, the complete set  - 3-4 if to collect analog on   that total saving in weight will be the order 100-150... Even not ridiculously. Interesting, how many people all carries the 3-4 kilogram park of optics, and how many to the people drags with itself  with one lens

73

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, sambl4, you wrote: S> it is interesting, how many people all carries the 3-4 kilogram park of optics, and how many to the people drags with itself  with one lens Looking that, for what and as you remove. If the optics complete set you  drag it everything, plus still  and a mount is really necessary to you. And if it is enough  with one lens most likely it is enough and the normal good camera, without replaceable optics.

74

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, IB, you wrote: IB> And if it is enough  with one lens most likely it is enough and the normal good camera, without replaceable optics. Well in my case at me of 80 % of time has been wound  a lens And such cameras and is not present.

75

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> vim - suxx, nano - rulez the Fact!