76

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> Yes, and about "FE mount"... The Bayonet joint is called simply "", and "FE" - lenses for  cameras. Only EF if my sclerosis does not change

77

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: SVZ>> Yes, and about "FE mount"... The Bayonet joint is called simply "", and "FE" - lenses for  cameras. M> only EF if my sclerosis does not change the Sclerosis does not change, but there is a nuance At the Sleepyhead - FE, at the Canon - EF.

78

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, SkyDance, you wrote: SD> That that? SD> Take the camera under the task, instead of "an elephant vs a whale". Funny, unique post on business and that without the answer

79

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, meltdown addicted, you wrote: MA> it is amusing, a unique post on business and that without the answer on what business, what task? The person read about new  -  to which all in large quantities pass, about that that  is not necessary any more is an excess weight and volume and decided to consult. To it on business also wrote as  and  are marketing features

80

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, jhfrek, you wrote: J> on what business, what task? Certainly. Any tool is selected under the task. That is simply visually cooler otherwise undertakes. J> to it on business also wrote as  and  are marketing features It not so. In one  there is no here such here mega a cool piece, it can and technically is not possible. At the same time any  cannot join such uncountable set of the indirect equipment as it can (at least while also the nearest some years) cameras Kenon and hardly to a lesser degree Nikon. So it is strong more than simply "marketing features" and the task  in a choice.

81

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, Tyomchik, you wrote: Those> A9 it is a new leader and more abruptly competitors literally on each parameter, except weight well and the price list horse.  how much I see, on the formal parameters 9 only caught up with 750th (14th year the camera), and that not on all. And the last advantage that was carried out on a flag weighs as high-grade , that is even, and that left.

82

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, meltdown addicted, you wrote: MA> It not so. In one  there is no here such here mega a cool piece to go nuts, at the full teapot the device will not be focused permanently any more on a nose of the person. What for this "mega a cool piece"? In studio the model does not escape anywhere, some generally both a composition and focus build on real-time to a picture on 40 inch monitor. There it is possible to be focused manually. MA> at the same time any  cannot join such uncountable set of the indirect equipment as it can (at least while also the nearest some years) cameras Kenon and hardly to a lesser degree Nikon. So it is strong more than simply "marketing features" and the task  in a choice. What for the equipment, what percent of users it uses? Here this mega a piece recognizes an eye and has time to trace it?

83

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, meltdown addicted, you wrote: J>> to It on business also wrote as  and  are marketing features MA> It not so. In one  there is no here such here mega a cool piece, it can and technically is not possible. Since in  already is Live view such  it is technically implemented. However, how much it successfully works in real - not clearly. In a roller it is explicitly visible that pupil search fine lags behind object driving, to include the continuous focusing easier and manually to drift a focusing point. So it will be . MA> At the same time any  cannot join such uncountable set of the indirect equipment as it can (at least while also the nearest some years) cameras Kenon and hardly to a lesser degree Nikon. So it is strong more than simply "marketing features" and the task  in a choice. And you mean what equipment? ? The hot boot at all is. Exterior light - at , for example (others was not interested), is a separate output on , all as at big DSLR. Lenses? Well, while the pro it is universal did not pass on  under them do not do special lenses  "Sigma-bazuka". But  it is possible to screw on the same  lenses through an adapter (probably such it was required to someone), we can consider that a problem with assortment of lenses - temporal. There would be a demand.

84

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, jhfrek, you wrote: J> to go nuts, at the full teapot the device will not be focused permanently any more on a nose of the person. J> that for the equipment, what percent of users uses it? Judging by answers, it is quite possible to select that camera which looks cooler

85

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

MA> Judging by answers, it is quite possible to select that camera which looks the logician-99 cooler than level - the camera selects paucity, and it is necessary to judge under my answers

86

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> Since in  already is Live view such  it is technically implemented. However, how much it successfully works in real - not clearly. In a roller it is explicitly visible that pupil search fine lags behind object driving, to include the continuous focusing easier and manually to drift a focusing point. So it will be . And I do, it is not so convenient especially on a wide diaphragm. SVZ> and you mean what equipment? ? The hot boot at all is. 1/200 at the best, not interesting. And here in hsync and banal TTL already strongly not all flashouts will work. SVZ> lenses? And they too. A ruler at  small and as consequence the expensive. All not native autofocal lenses first of all for Canon + Nikon and sometimes Sony. Remaining as carries.

87

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, jhfrek, you wrote: J> the logic-99 level - the camera selects paucity, and it is necessary to judge the Pancake under my answers, in all these 6 alphabetic  it is possible to be tangled. More truly already.

88

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, meltdown addicted, you wrote: SVZ>> Since in  already is Live view such  it is technically implemented. However, how much it successfully works in real - not clearly. In a roller it is explicitly visible that pupil search fine lags behind object driving, to include the continuous focusing easier and manually to drift a focusing point. So it will be . MA> And I do, it is not so convenient especially on a wide diaphragm. Probably, I rarely remove on open holes. And on typical 3.5-5.6 it is normally caught. MA> 1/200 at the best, not interesting. And here in hsync and banal TTL already strongly not all flashouts will work. So it and in the world  synchronization either 1/200, or 1/250, and hi-speed not at all. And  too not all are able . MA> the Ruler at  small and as consequence the expensive. All not native autofocal lenses first of all for Canon + Nikon and sometimes Sony. Remaining as carries. It is a question of exceptional demand. Chineses, Koreans now started to rivet actively glasses for . Perhaps after them, and the Sigma, Tamron and other will be tightened. It provided that vendors  will not rise in a pose and to close patents the bayonet joints.

89

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> So it and in the world  synchronization either 1/200, or 1/250, and hi-speed not at all. And  too not all are able . SVZ> It is a question of exceptional demand. SVZ> Chineses, Koreans now started to rivet actively glasses for . Perhaps after them, and the Sigma, Tamron and other will be tightened. Well I about what speak - details a heap and depending on that for what the camera it is necessary and steals up, as the camera as that, and the camera with an infrastructure is bought not

90

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> It is a question of exceptional demand. SVZ> Chineses, Koreans now started to rivet actively glasses for . Perhaps after them, and the Sigma, Tamron and other will be tightened. "People" are tightened: for Fuji: Bower, Handevision, Lensbaby, Meyer-Optik Gorlitz, Mitakon Zhongyi, Opteka, Rokinon, Samyang, Zeiss for Sony: Handevision, Lensbaby, Meyer-Optik Gorlitz, Mitakon Zhongyi, Opteka, Rokinon, Samyang, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, Venus Optics, Voigtlander, Yasuhara, Zeiss

91

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> It is a question of exceptional demand. Stanislav, I not so understand, what you (you?) try () to explain to me. We about one and too speak. Despite all similarity  and  they different and is better/is worse approach for different tasks. Without understanding of the task it is possible to select unless on appearance.

92

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, meltdown addicted, you wrote: MA> Despite all similarity  and  they different and is better/is worse approach for different tasks. And it is possible to announce, please, as an educational program the task list for  vs. The task list for ?

93

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, IB, you wrote: IB> And the last advantage that was carried out on a flag weighs as high-grade , that is even, and that left. For the sake of justice, still as advantage (in certain cases) tell about the electronic view-finder, a pier present WYSIWYG, the histogram directly in it is shown, the mirror does not close a type during an instant of shooting. But on the other hand is LiveView.

94

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> we can consider that a problem with assortment of lenses - temporal. There would be a demand. - temporal, , but it is necessary to remove the majority of problems MILC right now, instead of sometime then when they resolve.

95

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> And it is possible to announce, please, as an educational program the task list for  vs. The task list for ? Long and senselessly to write. For 98 % of the modern users that camera which visually was pleasant to them approaches.

96

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, meltdown addicted, you wrote: P>> And it is possible to announce, please, as an educational program the task list for  vs. The task list for ? MA> Long and senselessly to write. For 98 % of the modern users that camera which visually was pleasant to them approaches. You will not check, the answer corresponds to waitings

97

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> you will not check, the answer corresponds to waitings I will not check. You expected "meal".

98

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

P> Took 750th carcass and a couple of lenses. While it is pleasant Small Friday update. Found out ghost effect -  runs into similarity of a trance from sounds "" at serial shooting.