1

Topic: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Actually, subj. What think, colleagues?

2

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> That think, colleagues?  on speed is not worse, than the Canon 5 (1 generations). On weight and overall dimensions all is remarkable. Only the battery comes to an end faster, but it is expected.

3

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> Fudzhik on speed is not worse, than the Canon 5 (1 generations). It under reviews or on a private experience?

4

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

I love the DSLR, but strains its size, because of it I take frequent not it with myself, and I photograph on phone So as the following camera I probably selected simply qualitative device with the compact sizes.

5

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> That think, colleagues? And what pluses at DSLR are now?

6

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, sambl4, you wrote: S> And what pluses at DSLR are now? Like as choice in a category full frame there is more and, I think, the choice of lenses is richer.

7

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: S>> And what pluses at DSLR are now? P> like as choice in a category full frame there is more and, I think, the choice of lenses is richer. Like at modern  the exactly same connectors and, accordingly, lenses. But not the expert, I can confuse.

8

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, MozgC, you wrote: MC> I love the DSLR, but strains its size, because of it I take frequent not it with myself, and I photograph on phone the sizes it yes. Therefore I look on Mirrorless. Like they it is easier. Strains many the negative responses almost on all . Interesting, it in the core those who did not cope , or modern DSLR are really so problematic. MC> so as the following camera I probably selected simply qualitative device with the compact sizes. Selected - does not arrange by possibilities when it is necessary macro- and a body-.

9

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, Dair, you wrote: D> Hello, paucity, you wrote: P>> like as choice in a category full frame there is more and, I think, the choice of lenses is richer. D> like at modern  the exactly same connectors and, accordingly, lenses. But not the expert, I can confuse. Well unless. Here for example, under FF from Sony there are no the same . Yes, I will corrode there the same Sony E - but if to pick up not special FF a lens, not all matrix there works. Well and batteries like on DSLR  suffices.

10

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: SVZ>> Fudzhik on speed is not worse, than the Canon 5 (1 generations). P> It under reviews or on a private experience? On the own. I have both aforementioned devices. Sensitivity of a matrix above. The color rendition at  is much better. The balance white is more exact. In general to show  not so especially it is necessary. In general, for 10 years progress is.

11

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, sambl4, you wrote: S> And what pluses at DSLR are now? A fast auto focus. Not all  have a phase focusing. A long-playing battery. Optics park. When you remove the big size of the camera has the pluses much - to hold conveniently,  the good.

12

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

P> strains many the negative responses almost on all . Less attentions turn on responses, take better per day in hire

13

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, MozgC, you wrote: MC> I love the DSLR, but strains its size, because of it I take frequent not it with myself, and I photograph on phone +1 MC> So as the following camera I probably selected simply qualitative device with the compact sizes. And such is?

14

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, binnom, you wrote: MC>> So as the following camera I probably selected simply qualitative device with the compact sizes. B> and such is? "". The size about a palm, the price as at Frets Grants

15

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, paucity, you wrote: P> Actually, subj. P> That think, colleagues? Perhaps I lagged behind life but how to remove without the view-finder, on a back screen? Or at present  there is a similar view-finder on a fast matrix?

16

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> Perhaps I lagged behind life but how to remove without the view-finder, on a back screen? Or at present  there is a similar view-finder on a fast matrix? At some is. Both optical, and numeral. At  100 the view-finder generally "3 in one" - either optical, or numeral, or hybrid. At the numeral view-finder resolution high, quality is not worse, than at the normal.

17

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: M>> Perhaps I lagged behind life but how to remove without the view-finder, on a back screen? Or at present  there is a similar view-finder on a fast matrix? SVZ> at some is. Both optical, and numeral. And how optical on  shows, what will be in a frame? SVZ> at  100 the view-finder generally "3 in one" - either optical, or numeral, or hybrid. At the numeral view-finder resolution high, quality is not worse, than at the normal. I.e. an eye in an eye you put, and there to you digit from a matrix? And with a speed as?

18

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M>>> Perhaps I lagged behind life but how to remove without the view-finder, on a back screen? Or at present  there is a similar view-finder on a fast matrix? SVZ>> at some is. Both optical, and numeral. M> and how optical on  shows, what will be in a frame? As on old kind . A parallax and so on. But if a lens fixed problems are not present. At any Olimpusov the view-finder was optional, was put in  a boot. SVZ>> at  100 the view-finder generally "3 in one" - either optical, or numeral, or hybrid. At the numeral view-finder resolution high, quality is not worse, than at the normal. M> I.e. an eye in an eye you put, and there to you digit from a matrix? And with a speed as? Normally with a speed, from optics practically does not differ. Shows already processed frame as it will be written down in jpeg.

19

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> As on old kind . A parallax and so on. But if a lens fixed problems are not present. SVZ> At any Olimpusov the view-finder was optional, was put in  a boot. Well, i.e. , as well as 10 years ago.  that educated SVZ>>> At  100 the view-finder generally "3 in one" - either optical, or numeral, or hybrid. At the numeral view-finder resolution high, quality is not worse, than at the normal. M>> I.e. an eye in an eye you put, and there to you digit from a matrix? And with a speed as? SVZ> it is normal with a speed, from optics practically does not differ. Shows already processed frame as it will be written down in jpeg. Well, it already something. Something fast to remove such it was possible? Sports any, kiddies there playing at least?

20

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M>>> I.e. an eye in an eye you put, and there to you digit from a matrix? And with a speed as? SVZ>> it is normal with a speed, from optics practically does not differ. Shows already processed frame as it will be written down in jpeg. M> Well, it already something. Something fast to remove such it was possible? Sports any, kiddies there playing at least? Well here so somehow:

21

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: M>> Well, it already something. Something fast to remove such it was possible? Sports any, kiddies there playing at least? SVZ> well here so somehow: SVZ> Image: 1AT1iFWVfLc.jpg Thanks for an example. I think that if it would be desirable good frames -  it is necessary  and if it would be desirable convenience in a pocket - then  or  not strongly will be worse

22

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

P> That think, colleagues? That that? Take the camera under the task, instead of "an elephant vs a whale".

23

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, sambl4, you wrote: P>> That think, colleagues? S> and what pluses at DSLR are now? At  with just the same matrix the working segment will be less, i.e. it is less "back focal length" that for the same 1/2.8 (which only the ratio of 2 segments, instead of abstract "force") means that it is possible to manage more compact lens but as the lens is less, and the same sensor control - to everyone  gets less light. I.e. for similar  effects it is necessary glasses on a step above, and for  depths of sharpness it is necessary even more (my personal sensations from passage with on small  after big ). Competent  me correct if . Basically, setting DSLR of optics through an adapter returns all into place, but - other answers, about focusing and so on see.

24

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Those> Bezzerkalka FF: the hulk easy. Glasses 1.4 in 5 times are more expensive. More expensively - but not because it is more difficult. Those> I.e.  = difficulties to engineers to design the sizes light optics. All just what isn't needed. Compact high-aperture optics to project and produce more cheaply.

25

Re: New : DSLR or Mirrorless?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> the Fast auto focus. Not all  have a phase focusing. It is not necessary to take simple where it is not present SVZ> the Long-playing battery. It yes. But it is possible and to buy in addition. 2 batteries on Sony Nex sufficed me always. SVZ> optics Park. It is good, if it already is. Besides it with itself especially not . SVZ> When you remove the big size of the camera has the pluses much - to hold conveniently,  the good. Looking how to remove. The people buy  and then to it already  to drag with itself convenient  with good  - are simply too heavy.