1

Topic: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

What advise to select? They differ on reliability? It would be desirable that did not die Also speed  readings \records it is important

2

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Hello, mangaman, you wrote: M> What advise to select? They differ on reliability? It would be desirable that did not die Also speed  readings \records Samsung is important. http://www.samsung.com/nz/memory-storag … -7KE1T0BW/ But better M. 2 if there is a possibility.

3

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

BOB> But it is better than M. 2 if there is a possibility. Not, I have no place,  old

4

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

BOB> Samsung. http://www.samsung.com/nz/memory-storag … -7KE1T0BW/ And than so in essence differs pro from evo?

5

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Hello, mangaman, you wrote: BOB>> Samsung. http://www.samsung.com/nz/memory-storag … -7KE1T0BW/ M> And than so in essence differs pro from evo? At about hardly faster  reading (+2 %), and on 30 % above reliability. At me  a year as, problems are not present.

6

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Those> Crucial mx300 https://www.amazon.com/Crucial-MX300-In … B01IAGSDUE In, at me just this of the beginnings to become covered  by units. Worked exactly year. Also that is insulting, is reverse  will not send - it is necessary  to the vendor, and that, probably, changes (or repairs).

7

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

M> And than so in essence differs pro from evo? For the average user - the price and only the price. For a gourmet - Pro - MLC (2-bit) storage, EVO - TLC (3-bit). Accordingly, a warranty of 10 and 5 years. That, in general, too it is not especially important, for in 5 years for whom it all will be necessary...

8

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Hello, SkyDance, you wrote: SD> For a gourmet - Pro - MLC (2-bit) storage, EVO - TLC (3-bit). And is ? Official, instead of  shop. I once rummaged in  , did not find. SD> accordingly, a warranty of 10 and 5 years. That, in general, too it is not especially important, for in 5 years for whom it all will be necessary... The Disputable statement. 1 and in 5 years 1. With rather decent speed of access. Moving with SATA3 on M.2 subjectively differences (except volume) I do not see, though on  it enormous. Game of 5 seconds was launched and became 4? The studio of 1,5 seconds was launched and became 1,3? .  SATA2 and SATA3 the difference too was hardly noticeable.

9

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Hello, mangaman, you wrote: M> What advise to select? They differ on reliability? It would be desirable that did not die Also speed  readings \records it is important IMHO, Samsung 850 EVO. The warranty of 5 years, one of the fastest (500 MB/s) 850 PRO makes sense, on a disk continuously to write the data (date-center?). For the scenario " ", IMHO, sense any. A new series on v-nand (the Samsung 960) IMHO, too to take is not present sense, if a notebook not new (without M.2 PCIe 3), it stupidly does not pull its speed (3,500 MB/s) - it more than SATA III

10

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

IID> And is ? Official, instead of  shop. I once rummaged in  , did not find. In sense ""? Yes you simply look at chips, to them to all  are accessible. IID> 1 and in 5 years 1.! And through 10? You remember, what at you were 10 years ago a system disk? I, apparently, and at all had a winchester, not SSD. Here and  to me a warranty for 10 years if more than 5 years at me lived only exterior winchesters, and that only because I used them only for .

11

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> At about hardly faster  reading (+2 %), and on 30 % above reliability. At me  a year as, problems are not present. And on 40 % above the price.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

12

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Hello, CoderMonkey, you wrote: CM> And on 40 % above the price.  then  it is necessary to take, from us a difference not such big.

13

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Hello, SkyDance, you wrote: IID>> And is ? Official, instead of  shop. I once rummaged in  , did not find. SD> in sense ""? Yes you simply look at chips, to them to all  are accessible."  are accessible "is it is loudly told And to look at chips not too simply, in the specification they are not specified, it is necessary to take the data from reviews. We look reviews 500 drives: 960 Evo and 960 Pro. At the first chips K90MGY8S7M, at the second K9HKGY8 are used. Both links from reviews conduct on  and the same marketing document of Samsung V-NAND technology which it is difficult to name . On" %chipname % datasheet "it is googled exactly . We come on the other hand. We look  at all drive, with  : 960 Evo Rev 1.1, 960 Pro Rev 1.1. The situation becomes clearer not: At Evo storage is designated as" V-NAND 3Bit MLC "- the marketing trick," multiple "it" a little "so also THREE But the buyer sees treasured MLC, in strict correspondence with""is available. At Pro it is designated as"V-NAND", without a concrete definition. What hindered to write" 2 Bit "or similar? The interesting moment - footnotes in section Technical Specification. At EVO indexes TBW have a footnote in 4 asterisks (****) however in the list of footnotes TBW is designated as 3 asterisks (***). At Pro such  is not present. I willingly believe that at Pro two-bit cells, and at Evo . But why it is so much fog and so differs TBW a little? AFAIK for SLC/MLC the difference in 1 bit gave difference on the order, instead of in 2 times.

14

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

IID> we Come on the other hand. We look  at all drive, with  : 960 Evo Rev 1.1, 960 Pro Rev 1.1. In  it is considered 850, SATA. IID> At Evo storage is designated as "V-NAND 3Bit MLC" - the marketing trick It not the marketing trick, and the official initiating name of storage of this kind is available. Still before generally there was abbreviation TLC. Probably, did not begin to rename. Logically. IID> I willingly believe that at Pro two-bit cells, and at Evo . It is absolutely precisely specified in : 850 Pro, 850 EVO. To consider is is more specific them MLC V-NAND - look here, TLC - officially named 3-bit MLC - here. A fog there not marketing, but simply "drum-type" - in sense all on a drum, whether any specific pedants will be any or not.

15

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Those> How to learn about ? Crucial Storage Executive. Reads SMART. If is reallocations is it. But generally can be so that these  will not be noted until on them it is not necessary a real file. Actually, I noted these  only when it was required to work with rarely used . Which appeared beaten. Those> Samsungi  that  that .  as usual years work For me 830 PRO 512Gb, 960 Pro about half a year - and censures absolutely any already  how many.

16

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Hello, Tyomchik, you wrote: Those>>> Samsungi  that  that . SD>> Artem as usual SD>> 830 PRO 512Gb works For me already  how many years, 960 Pro about half a year - and censures absolutely any. Those> Galaksi S1 - . ! You still ZX-Spectrum 48 + recall. Lies at me such, 1984 of release, Samsung manufacture. Works, by the way. Those> Stiralki a top load - . ! We Remember-remember. Those> What for to support dollar mark which is not present-is not present and plays a dirty trick? About 840 evo it is a fact of common knowledge. At  ssd there was a file system damage at a multi-threaded mode trim. But you can eat midges, it is pleasant to you and absolutely anything never . 4 monitors . Pieces of 6 phones (by the way, with WinPhone and SuperAMOLED were the smartest devices in 2011, all competitors were bought up in your drugstores) 2 SSD 1Tb HDD (worried 1  and 2 westerns, about 10 years to it, till now it is live and works in a computer at a daughter) the printer (too about 10 years) 2 microwaves, the vacuum cleaner, a TV set. Problems was not with one device. How like to speak  (and, so, and you) - ?

17

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

Hello, mangaman, you wrote: BOB>> But it is better than M. 2 if there is a possibility. M> not, I have no place,  old Anyway - is is more general-purpose M.2 with an adapter on 2.5".  it is possible to change in the future, the disk on 1TB becomes not soon outdated, and for new M. 2 (with 2000MB/c against 500MB/c)  .

18

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

19

Re: Choice SSD of a disk 2.5 "on 1

__> Anyway - is is more general-purpose M.2 with an adapter on 2.5", and such is? I did not know, thanks