Hello, Pavel Dvorkin, you wrote: PD> With the last I will agree without any dispute, and here about an inconvenient web - I would not tell. As here many stated that mobile application is a minibrowser. The sizes of the screen is already sufficient argument. To make a web application which it would be convenient in a browser not simply and it pours out in separate development. And considering that from the Web to use different tach-technologies inconveniently people and make decision to saw the spets-decision. Add here access to services like and the question by itself disappears. PD> if I correctly understand, who does not have desktop, absolutely all the same, in what type the program will be on a desktop. So they here generally at anything. It was the answer to a question "why smart odds are selected". VD>> 3. For mobile phones elimination of the left applications is carried out. For a desktop too many different problems with safety. PD> here lines knows. I trust the Windows to applications, rather than applications of Androida much more. All all the same on that that you there to yourself think. Applications installed of are checked; have a reliable source (itself ); work in (cannot do much harm another applications or climb in their storage;) have the list of resolution of access to OS resources (you can read that can do application). Therefore from people put applications where (are not afraid). In general it concerns and Vindovomu . But application for it is not so normal application and it will work only on ten. application will work everywhere. PD> the First (classical) at least do not ask access to the list of security accounts on my computer, to my directory Thunderbird. And what to ask that? They and so have possibility to take that want. Unless access rights on files can prevent yes access level of the user. PD> And it is easy neither that, nor another do not receive. And the list of my phones it for what not to receive because it simply is not present. Ofigitelnyj argument. It means that application cannot give any functionality. PD> and the second for some reason ask it, and it is necessary to give, at least in versions of Androida <5. And in later versions, in general, too (though it is controlled, but it is not assured completely not that all users well understand that here it is necessary to do). Authors ask not for some reason, and what for. If the program requests something, it means uses this functional of OS. In Vidne to you all are accessible a priori. And to ask sense is not present. And that that in it something is not present, so its this restriction, instead of restriction of the rights of the program. PD> P.S. Only sent - and on you PD> https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media
m=newsfeed Only this trojan still needs to be delivered on phone. And for this purpose it is necessary to deliver left apk from the left site and to ungear the prohibition of it in OS. applications have all these possibilities . And to catch a trojan absolutely not mandatory to put something. It is enough to open the nested letter in worthless , and even it is stupid to come on a nasty site. PD> I as the argument in a subject did not understand it. Well can, I do not argue, but that from this in respect of what mobile applications, instead of web prefer? Normally web applications appear much earlier. For example at the Savings Bank so was. I and do not use that their client as the web variant suits me. PD> here it is serious argument. It is necessary to understand only - why fashionably mobile applications, instead of mobile versions of sites. To understand a mode senselessly. It from a series. "All ran also I ran."