26

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

27

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

28

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Principal advantage Code Signing of the certificate - in lowering (sometimes to zero) false actuatings of anti-virus products on the protected files. And in view of that almost all use this or that decision for protection of binary files - the certificate now, it is possible to tell, is mandatory.

29

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, DotFix, you wrote: DF> Principal advantage Code Signing of the certificate... DF> Perfect solutions for software protection and source code recovery we Put advertizing on the left and to the right! There can be hand-made articles correct, that antiviruses did not swear?

30

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, rean, you wrote: R> we Put advertizing on the left and to the right! The signature has been adjusted hundred years ago in a profile. She creates discomfort? R> can be the hand-made articles correct, that antiviruses did not swear? The question should be turned to vendors of antiviruses.  reputable - for a long time already support the analysis of all widespread protection. And there false actuatings are not present. To a word with many AV-vendorami we dare for a long time at communications and questions operatively. Only here in last years it became very favourable to write 5 antiviruses, there was a trend. About time in half a year there is a hand-made article in style of known anti-virus authors-memov (, beautiful wall-paper...) Which essence: packed either protected than or the file is declared by any as Trojan. Packed. Generic (behind an exception unless UPX), all remaining is corrected exceptional by signatures and the white list. To correct this situation it is impossible basically as  to define the modern protection it is almost unreal. Alas - some consider till now that it is a problem of developers of protection and they should invent day and night as to bypass bugs in antiviruses.

31

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

DF> the Signature has been adjusted hundred years ago in a profile. She creates discomfort? Certainly, direct advertizing, in not profile subject. R>> can be the hand-made articles correct, that antiviruses did not swear? DF> the question should be turned to vendors of antiviruses.  reputable - for a long time already support the analysis of all widespread protection. DF> behind an exception unless UPX UPX for a long time in black list Avast. And here NullSoft, made NSIS, - reputable ? , made NSIS, are defined as viruses by some nedo-antiviruses. I to myself selected the version what is not caught. Why it, yes because instead of propagation of the distribution kit to 150 mbytes I spread 40 mbytes. DF> alas - some consider till now that it is a problem of developers of protection and they should invent day and night as to bypass bugs in antiviruses. On my observation if the antivirus finds a virus in the program, 99 % a problem that there there is a buffer overflow at the incorrect input data. Few times it to me helped to find an error in the program. There are exceptions: For example, absence standard a Visual C ++ CRT. Do not love some antiviruses, in particular Avast, , made absolutely without CRT. For this reason small  I had to do under GCC. The idea is clear - with  probability the small program can appear a virus because viruses specially do small. And on 64-bit  do not stammer at all. Still some unpopular antiviruses consider as a virus  CRT from old versions Delhi if it is done the unpretentious program for console. But it absolutely wildness. So at what here protection? The sign-code signature not for bypass of antiviruses, not for bypass of whims of some big corporations, and only means to identify the developer. The name in  would be desirable to shine - append the signature. Only it is not necessary to spread ideas that unsigned programs are not put in Windows. Personally I consider that the sign-code signature is useful to a certain category of programs, but it does not mean that all programs should be signed. As it is known that there is a discrimination not the American countries, essentially complicating possibility to receive this signature.