1

Topic: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

, as well as promised. Received the certificate from Comodo on . The person. Ordered on December, 14th, received today 15th. Month taking into account all holidays. For 2 years, gave 14330 roubles. It was not necessary to do generally anything. Scanned docks, sent, a month later downloaded the certificate. You ask, and as a campaign to the notary of whom all frighten. And figs it knows. The matter is that I ordered through specialized office, Emaro SSL. They have a lured lawyer who is certificated in Comodo. He at them assures all docks.  give the form in English that I such such, here my documents etc. This form you fill, you undersign, you scan and you transfer together with docks. Weeks through two still asked the phone bill. I sent an extract for a mobile phone since stationary is not present. Today sent a link on callback, a reverse call. You press a link, you rung by the robot, dictates digits, you enter them on a site dressers. In five minutes sent the certificate. The certificate is installed in the browser, it therefrom should be exported. From Firefox the file.p12 instead of.pfx is by the way exported. But it is one hogwash, all subscribes and .

2

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> For 2 years, gave 14330 roubles. SHA-1. And SHA-256? I now and 1 and 256 sign. Or I did not understand something?

3

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, CRT, you wrote: CRT> Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC>> For 2 years, gave 14330 roubles. SHA-1. CRT> And SHA-256? I now and 1 and 256 sign. CRT> or I did not understand something? And here I still itself did not understand. The certificate which in the browser has both prints, but in signed by me exe is specified sha1.

4

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: CRT>> And SHA-256? I now and 1 and 256 sign. CRT>> or I did not understand something? QC> and here I still itself did not understand. The certificate which in the browser has both prints, but in signed by me exe is specified sha1. It is an important question. SHA-1 only for compatibility with XP/fd sha256 added in command line for singtool?

5

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> And here I still itself did not understand. The certificate which in the browser has both prints, but in signed by me exe is specified sha1. In signtool it is possible to select algorithm . sha-256, though sha-512 on a default sha-1

6

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> And here I still itself did not understand. The certificate which in the browser has both prints, but in signed by me exe is specified sha1. It turned out to sign with SHA256 this certificate?

7

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> Otpisyvajus, as well as promised. QC> received the certificate from Comodo on . The person. QC> ordered on December, 14th, received today 15th. Month taking into account all holidays. Children, and it is possible popularly, and what for it (certificate) is necessary in 2018? What pluses? Here it is simply interesting... I feel directly not informed...

8

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, CRT, you wrote: CRT> It turned out to sign with SHA256 this certificate? Yes, became sha256RSA. At me signtool was old, did not support/fd.

9

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, wamaco, you wrote: W> Children, and it is possible popularly, and what for it (certificate) is necessary in 2018? W> what pluses? W> here it is simply interesting... I feel directly not informed... I understand if you told what for it is necessary in 2008 or in 1998. Then yes, it was not necessary. And now without it on win10 your software simply will not be installed.

10

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

11

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> How to define that a file it is signed sha256? I found unique difference in properties only here: the Right mouse button on an EXE file. "Properties" "Sign-code signatures". There, in "the list of signatures" - the table. We look that in a column "Algorithm of sampling". There should be sha256. At me in this table 2 of a line: one with sha1, another with sha256. sha1 for XP

12

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> I understand if you told what for it is necessary in 2008 or in 1998. QC> Then yes, it was not necessary. And now without it on win10 your software simply will not be installed. It is any news? What such software will not be installed on win10 without the certificate?

13

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, CRT, you wrote: CRT> At me in this table 2 of a line: one with sha1, another with sha256. CRT> sha1 for XP Well in general, yes, sha256 is.

14

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

QC> Then yes, it was not necessary. And now without it on win10 your software simply will not be installed. Totally ludicrous. When it is necessary for to justify psychologically expenditure 14330  begins to seem that without the certificate even on street not to quit.

15

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, rean, you wrote: R> When it is necessary for to justify psychologically expenditure 14330  begins to seem that without the certificate even on street not to quit. When conversion falls from 2-4 % to 0.2-0.4 % then even to justify nothing it is necessary. You run and spend and more.

16

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello,/aka/, you wrote: A> It is any news? What such software will not be installed on win10 without the certificate? Like as the driver cannot without ev be delivered now the certificate

17

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, rean, you wrote: QC>> Then yes, it was not necessary. And now without it on win10 your software simply will not be installed. R> totally ludicrous. R> when it is necessary for to justify psychologically expenditure 14330  begins to seem that without the certificate even on street not to quit. It not that total for the sake of which it is necessary to search for justifications

18

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, NWP, you wrote: A>> It is any news? What such software will not be installed on win10 without the certificate? NWP> like as the driver cannot without ev be delivered now the certificate So that EV. The HARDWARE outlined that without normal code signing something on win10 will not be installed.

19

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

20

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello,/aka/, you wrote: A> So that EV. The HARDWARE outlined that without normal code signing something on win10 will not be installed. , I incorrectly expressed, not "will not be installed", and "do not install". And loyalty of antiviruses goes a bonus to the certificate. Much less  with the certificate.

21

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

22

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

A>> It is any news? What such software will not be installed on win10 without the certificate? NWP> like as the driver cannot without ev be delivered now the certificate Podi at first buy on the physicist this ev the certificate. Heard a ring, yes I do not know where it.

23

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, rean, you wrote: R> Podi at first buy on the physicist this ev the certificate. Heard a ring, yes I do not know where it. You  such ? At what here the physicist? The question what for the certificate was necessary, instead of on whom it.

24

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)

Hello, rean, you wrote: R> Where logic? I criticized the message on that that in Windows our programs do not work. You do not work. R> we work. And we buy. Statistics of downloadings and  accurately shows all. In! And share please statistics of downloadings and successful setting. It without the certificate?

25

Re: Comodo Code Signing for physicists (successfully)