Hello, Aniskin, you wrote: A> Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K>> That you think of it? A> there is at me one theory, but it concerns more software arguing at forums. as a whole lazy creations and if all of them arranges they are lazy to write the positive responses. But if there is a problem from a software to write that a software a shit they are not too lazy. For example, I created the ideal licked product, allocated on what a forum, people shook, looked, began to use, but are silent as guerrillas. And if in a software there is an error somebody yes writes about it. Then the second confirms. Still that writes the third. Also there is a high-grade discussion. Seeing live , in this discussion can put and those with which all suits. Others which esteemed this discussion, think, time someone uses a product give and I will try. And gradually round errors there is certain community of which would not be if there were no errors. Certainly, the described situation a little , but the theory I think it is clear. I too had such thoughts, and think that it still actually for dialogue on the Internet: if, for example, the blogger writes ideal posts to it, exaggerating, nobody will answer.