1

Topic: The useful bugs in the program

I sometimes have a situation, when to me definitely reluctance  an insignificant bug. It seems to me, from such bug can be and the favor if it is not known, is how much claimed a feature in which it is shown. The earlier the letter with , the  this feature comes, i.e. this bug can refine back coupling with users. What do you think of it?

2

Re: The useful bugs in the program

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> That you think of it? There is at me one theory, but it concerns more software arguing at forums.  as a whole lazy creations and if all of them arranges they are lazy to write the positive responses. But if there is a problem from a software to write that a software a shit they are not too lazy. For example, I created the ideal licked product, allocated  on what  a forum, people shook, looked, began to use, but are silent as guerrillas. And if in a software there is an error somebody yes writes about it. Then the second confirms. Still that  writes the third. Also there is a high-grade discussion. Seeing live , in this discussion can put and those  with which all suits. Others  which esteemed this discussion, think, time someone uses a product give  and I will try. And gradually round errors there is certain community of which would not be if there were no errors. Certainly, the described situation a little , but the theory I think it is clear.

3

Re: The useful bugs in the program

Hello, Aniskin, you wrote: A> Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K>> That you think of it? A> there is at me one theory, but it concerns more software arguing at forums.  as a whole lazy creations and if all of them arranges they are lazy to write the positive responses. But if there is a problem from a software to write that a software a shit they are not too lazy. For example, I created the ideal licked product, allocated  on what  a forum, people shook, looked, began to use, but are silent as guerrillas. And if in a software there is an error somebody yes writes about it. Then the second confirms. Still that  writes the third. Also there is a high-grade discussion. Seeing live , in this discussion can put and those  with which all suits. Others  which esteemed this discussion, think, time someone uses a product give  and I will try. And gradually round errors there is certain community of which would not be if there were no errors. Certainly, the described situation a little , but the theory I think it is clear. I too had such thoughts, and think that it still actually for dialogue on the Internet: if, for example, the blogger writes ideal posts to it, exaggerating, nobody will answer.

4

Re: The useful bugs in the program

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> That you think of it? There is no limit of human ability to find justifications of the laziness.

5

Re: The useful bugs in the program

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> I sometimes have a situation, when to me definitely reluctance  an insignificant bug. It seems to me, from such bug can be and the favor if it is not known, is how much claimed a feature in which it is shown. The earlier the letter with , the  this feature comes, i.e. this bug can refine back coupling with users. What do you think of it? To take the program of the competitor if it exists on the average easier, than to write .

6

Re: The useful bugs in the program

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: S> to take the program of the competitor if it exists On the average easier, than to write . It in case did not get used yet to a software. To pull down the user from a customary working software difficult.

7

Re: The useful bugs in the program

Hello, Tinman, you wrote: T> Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K>> That you think of it? T> there is no limit of human ability to find justifications of the laziness.

8

Re: The useful bugs in the program

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> I sometimes have a situation, when to me definitely reluctance  an insignificant bug. It seems to me, from such bug can be and the favor if it is not known, is how much claimed a feature in which it is shown. The earlier the letter with , the  this feature comes, i.e. this bug can refine back coupling with users. What do you think of it? Not all is unambiguous: 1) how many users noted and wrote. Can correct is easier, than to everyone to explain If one for 4 months can and there is no sense , manages. 2) how much the bug it is critical hinders performance of the primary goals. A critical bug it is necessary , it pulls down conversion. But the most important thing. On a fig to do what will not be necessary to users???? That is the code which or is not so necessary to users is written, or not so is critical that it does not work... On me if a bug critical - it is urgent  if is not present, to hammer yet . But explicit favor from this hardly you will especially derive, all is exceptional on randomnesses.

9

Re: The useful bugs in the program

K> I sometimes have a situation, when to me definitely reluctance  an insignificant bug. It seems to me, from such bug can be and the favor if it is not known, is how much claimed a feature in which it is shown. The earlier the letter with , the  this feature comes, i.e. this bug can refine back coupling with users. What do you think of it? I think that it is not difficult to build in statistics of usage of features the program.

10

Re: The useful bugs in the program

Hello, Aniskin, you wrote: A> Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K>> That you think of it? A> there is at me one theory, but it concerns more software arguing at forums.  as a whole lazy creations and if all of them arranges they are lazy to write the positive responses. Unambiguously do not write. Only if  ("miracle") happened> But if there is a problem from a software to write that a software a shit they are not too lazy. Here is range variants, from value of a bug and for example a maintenance stage:  or paid from " all" to "the Critical bug paid not  anybody"> the Third still that  writes the Small bug. Also there is a high-grade discussion. Seeing live , the Main thing - live . Normally on sites is not present live , in a rare occurence masters are not freezed and is normal (and is constant) answer. Users too adopt it. And all masters got used to it Thus can and would like to stick out eternally in a site messenger, or to employ, only it for the small company> in this discussion can expensively put and those  with which all suits. Others  which esteemed this discussion, think, They from a phase  revive in a live phase> time someone uses a product give  and I will try. And gradually round errors there is certain community, To community stage there is a long stage "here there are users / experts of this software", their various amount and quality> which would not be, if there were no errors. Errors - a special case  to dialogue should be created Infopovody, and errors thus  / in an ideal should be avoided simply critical bug it the strong irritant, it certainly for a nose drags the user "on disassembling", from other side the user can and to leave on other sites - the negative responses to write. Or generally to the competitor - depends how much the user already "" in our software