26

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

27

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

28

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

29

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K> it is possible, at it rotten processes, but on  began. To a measure at it there was no such obscene quality of releases, as now. The product was a product - a ready box product which could be shipped safely on a warehouse and which did not demand there and then after installation of any idiotic patches. K> I not against any "fast updates of serious holes" - so happen, but I against normal  holes for the user account. K> in an any way, now at a wheel - Nadella also is its direct fault in that sediment in which rolled down MS. You can is simple very young? I here remember what to use Win XP without dances with a tambourine became possible only after output SP1.

30

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: K>>>> Fortunately, it not MS solves, on what OS to sit to me and my clients S> You simply do not know, what such Core and.Net Standard And you do not know, what such Kernel Enterprise 7.11 - and what? You consider, to someone it needs to be known?? At us 15 years was . The heap of applications, intyprajz-systems, tools is created... You consider, though for a second Linups or  was necessary to these people? It MS it is necessary to represent a good mine at the bad game (and investors stretch that). But anyway, me it is simple as the person any attempts  my cozy developer world are not interesting. If at MS there is a high-grade, compatible implementation.NET under other platforms - well,  and for them. There is no such implementation - means MS is sent to saw further the budget. It is necessary to sit down simply to drink and realize: in the world of dominating Windows simply it be no point  with ANY system. The program is necessary - put  and do not show off. As it and so everywhere costs. S> Simply they did huge operation on transfer on  and developments.Net Native. Will Already move on libraries and to Gujam Already spoke: too late and too slowly. Also it is incompatible. And with a heap of bugs. It is possible to make from * a candy, but on an output there will be a normal sweet from  *** on. Manual MS in any way does not want to realize this simple thought, employing more and more monkeys and losing qualified personnel. And there are no "presents violent" - are not present and  products, there is no appropriate system, quality assurance, architecture, etc. Where NOW MS would not move, everywhere a wedge + gang of headless "seigneurs" at the head.