1

Topic: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Whether it was easier  WPF and a Visual Studio to collect them for Linux, Android, MacOS and what there still happens? Strategy is not clear. Will increase now features at VSCode to comparability from a Visual Studio or what will do?

2

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: whether > it was easier  WPF and a Visual Studio, > to collect them for Linux, Android, MacOS and what there still happens? > Strategy is not clear. Will increase now features at VSCode to comparability from a Visual Studio or what will do? Generally that develops xamarin-forms https://forums.xamarin.com/discussion/8 … map#latest vNext2 (est. Q1 2018) Fast Renderers Optimize view renderers to streamline view creation and improve performance. Ongoing work on controls. We will be releasing as they are complete. ListView Improvements Remove need for a ViewCell and the overhead that creates. Other performance improvements. Cut down on GPU overdraw for Android Try to avoid overdraw on Android where possible to improve performance. Gesture Improvements Add a Long Press gesture as well as an easy way to add custom gestures without requiring platform code. FlexLayout Review the original Evolution Proposal. Working Branch. We will be replacing the current layout system with Flex. Xamarin. Forms for GTK# Xamarin. Forms is coming to Linux. Working Repository. Xamarin. Forms for macOS Xamarin. Forms is coming to macOS, joining iOS, Android, Windows, and Tizen as target platforms for Xamarin. Forms. Renderer API Standardization Make it easier to create custom renderers. Spike PR. And XAML Satandard https://developer.xamarin.com/guides/xa … /standard/ https://developer.xamarin.com/guides/xa … /controls/ it is certainly rather weak, but the trouble is dashing began As to VSCode in it enclosed a heap of means and I do not think that it throw considering a mode on hybrid applications. https://ionicframework.com/docs/components/#alert https://thielcole.github.io/ionic2/2017 … tions.html

3

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: > What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code? Considering enormous mass already ready and more or less  editors, VSC it is not necessary generally. It both not IDE, and not the superficial editor - was stupid  "". Such sensation that in MS typed   with JS a background and simply did not know, than them to occupy. It is obvious, what even in the presence of everyones Code:: Blocks, SciTE, Anuta and other,  will continue  medieval vim "" and "and if at you the modem???" . So and here   idiocy citadels  on the full. Whether > it was easier  WPF and a Visual Studio to collect them for Linux, Android, MacOS and what there still happens? Not easier. Just because VS - at all  COM'ami/WinAPI a product,  it it is almost unreal, but since for pushing through Core it is necessary though any IDE for a spelling C#, they made a feint ears - let out the primitive editor, but named with almost full coincidence to a Visual Studio - and that is direct programmers do not guess that at them instead of IDE -  a JS-cursor!! > Strategy is not clear. Will increase now features at VSCode to comparability from a Visual Studio or what will do? That's it that strategy at them - to be engaged in any fresh-water sponge, representing activity in the markets which  are not necessary to them. Shoots - well, does not shoot - disperse dancers and type new  - already on Haskell! Now you understand that universal grief in the opinion of Ballmera when he said goodbye with MS? He understood,  buries MS the confused management and stupid frames. Even that ready that at them already in hands, they are not capable to develop. And one god knows, how many still this  the orgy can spend corporate money. In my opinion, it is a high time to merge actions MSFT.

4

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K> Now you understand that universal grief in the opinion of Ballmera when he said goodbye with MS? He understood,  buries MS the confused management and stupid frames. Pricks all it just also made this.  polymers began already at Balmere. K> In my opinion, it is a high time to merge actions MSFT. +38 % for a year... Trebled for 5 years... Not, it is not time.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

5

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

S> that develops xamarin-forms It till now demands online registration and does not work disconnected from the Internet? I do not understand, how it is possible to build development on means which can once in the morning at will of "legal owners" for ever turn to a pumpkin.

6

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Osaka, you wrote: S>> that develops xamarin-forms O> It till now demands online registration and does not work disconnected from the Internet? I do not understand, how it is possible to build development on means which can once in the morning at will of "legal owners" for ever turn to a pumpkin. And it is possible a reference? In requirements is not present. https://developer.xamarin.com/guides/xa … tallation/ Yes I remember the first Xamarin. Forms demands registration, now it goes as a part of a platform https://metanit.com/sharp/xamarin/1.1.php

7

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC> pricks all it just also made This.  polymers began already at Balmere. Probably, at it rotten processes, but on  began. To a measure at it there was no such obscene quality of releases, as now. The product was a product - a ready box product which could be shipped safely on a warehouse and which did not demand there and then after installation of any idiotic patches. I not against any "fast updates of serious holes" - so happen, but I against normal  holes for the user account. In an any way, now at a wheel - Nadella also is its direct fault in that sediment in which rolled down MS. K>> In my opinion, it is a high time to merge actions MSFT. CC> +38 % for a year... Trebled for 5 years... Not, it is not time. I not  , can someone and was welded on, but as to the programmer, for me MS - a dead horse.

8

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K> I not  , can someone and was welded on, but as to the programmer, for me MS - a dead horse. On, what passed?

9

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: S> Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K>> I not  , can someone and was welded on, but as to the programmer, for me MS - a dead horse. S> on, what passed? ... Here "on" is from "" or the comma is not necessary? Yes anywhere did not pass. I was enclosed in.NET, I write traditional WinForms/WPF/Server but for any Core I do not gather at all. In other words, for me "tomorrow's MS" - a corpse whom today bother and cover fireworks. And I write under today's (or even "yesterday's") - under Win7 a maximum. And when a year or two from now sad  managers come to chew snivels "we tried as could, but  did not fly up", I will be on other way, but is already far. Fortunately, it not MS solves, on what OS to sit to me and my clients - so I stopped on Win.NET 4.7 which suffices for eyes.

10

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K> Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: S>> Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K>>> I not  , can someone and was welded on, but as to the programmer, for me MS - a dead horse. S>> on, what passed? K> ... Here "on" is from "" or the comma is not necessary? Yes anywhere did not pass. I was enclosed in.NET, I write traditional WinForms/WPF/Server but for any Core I do not gather at all. In other words, for me "tomorrow's MS" - a corpse whom today bother and cover fireworks. And I write under today's (or even "yesterday's") - under Win7 a maximum. And when a year or two from now sad  managers come to chew snivels "we tried as could, but  did not fly up", I will be on other way, but is already far. Fortunately, it not MS solves, on what OS to sit to me and my clients - so I stopped on Win.NET 4.7 which suffices for eyes. That is while this muttering of not taken place hopes. Well time you sit, on 4.7 means use all the same.Net Standard which is compatible with Core and, for Core now and write all new. Normal.Net it is care of those who did not pass on Core. Badly, it or is good for solving to shareholders MS. And they  grew for 5 years https://ru.investing.com/equities/microsoft-corp

11

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

S> And it is possible a reference? In requirements is not present. https://developer.xamarin.com/guides/xa … tallation/ At visual studio community too like in requirements is not present, and in a month without the Internet it produces not closed window with the requirement to register. S> yes I remember the first Xamarin. Forms demands registration, now it goes as a part of a platform Tried to deliver its installer of studio (to include a daw at a choice of components), and he demanded somewhere to descend and inform them almost phone, differently refusing to be put. Now does not demand?

12

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Osaka, you wrote: S>> And it is possible a reference? In requirements is not present. https://developer.xamarin.com/guides/xa … tallation/ O> At visual studio community too like in requirements is not present, and in a month without the Internet it produces not closed window with the requirement to register. S>> yes I remember the first Xamarin. Forms demands registration, now it goes as a part of platform O> Tried to deliver its installer of studio (to include a daw at a choice of components), and he demanded somewhere to descend and inform them almost phone, differently refusing to be put. Now does not demand? Once again it was about 2 years ago. Now I in  was not present problems either with registration, or with the Internet. Simply when they Ksamarin only bought, there I remember there were such problems. Now is not present. Or did not note.

13

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K> So and here   idiocy citadels  on the full. And at me impression, what at ljaliho -  it flied up, let (while?) and it is not too high.

14

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

> Strategy is not clear. Will increase now features at VSCode to comparability from a Visual Studio or what will do? For Xamarin, Core and Mono probably fits.

15

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: K>> Fortunately, it not MS solves, on what OS to sit to me and my clients - so I stopped on Win.NET 4.7 which suffices for eyes. S> that is while this muttering of not taken place hopes. Well time you sit, on 4.7 means use all the same.Net Standard which we combine with Core Shta?? At me in a head porridge or you yet did not chew it? What else "Core"? I speak about Windows.NET 4.7 which is beaten by nails to Vende and which DOES NOT FOLLOW any standards - it simply is. And all jumps of IT macaques around is a temporary phenomenon.  "standards", them and  in 5 years. Linux - it never was a desktop And NEVER WILL be, here in what all salt. And  in Linupsy everyones Core generally does not influence in any way propagation  - the same of 1 % at  in . (For even they  to remain without ) DotNET - it it was necessary or to write at once humanly "transferred" (as Dzhabu), or not to soar to us a brain, to throw out confused VM and at once to do "the successor With ++" with  compilation (as now at Dee) and normal library. Already thousand programs are written strictly for Win.NET and to spring under a new pipe  (moreover not the most successful) - excuse, is not present either desires, nor courage - we grew wiser for so much years  . I already at all  believe that if  the rich person will be enclosed in Dee,  again remains behind a board (as once it kicked on roadside Delphi). Only here to catch up MS cannot any more - it does not have such lucid minds, as then more. We with the big surprise read about ruin Sun - it would seem, such giant! And I at all will not be surprised, if in flow of 5 years them either disorganize in halves, or buy with giblets, giving  Nadelle. These children walk on thin ice on which investors blow.

16

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K>> So and here   idiocy citadels  on the full. Ops> and at me impression, what at ljaliho -  it flied up, let (while?) and it is not too high. A keyword - "impression". When pair of clowns in each forum  the "just about already without five minutes nirvanas", it only words. Here when you will see at least from tens serious applications, with GUI and poetesses, and it on Core - then it is possible to tell all about any temporal triumph. The singularity of Linupsa is that, what there the DUSTBIN from languages, shells, libraries, , assembly systems, etc. If in this garbage to throw something standing, think, the reason celebration will be established? Enough and the initiating diagnosis "I have Linux" that person to start to treat and when it splashes a saliva in protection vi and writes the  on a C ++ (without understanding and half of subtleties of language), well to the such will tell?" Core ! "? Only not for it. And especially" not from a microsoftware "- for  this taboo. These vegetables ate a cactus, and WILL eat a cactus. Inertness of thinking and  does by"ideals"of them"  from IT ", therefore already owing to these reasons about any" coming Core "it is not necessary to speak. On what Dees - free, developed, with libraries - and that  manage about *** ,  for a long time out-of-date stereotypes and simply bosh! If Dee did not win marasmic , C# and for a long time.

17

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: whether > it was easier  WPF and a Visual Studio, > to collect them for Linux, Android, MacOS and what there still happens? WPF  absolutely, seemingly, so it is impossible. And vscode perfectly flied up on poppies where it is a lot of developers, and  normal it is not enough, especially for languages like JS, TypeScript, Clojure, Go, D and other any marginal. It turned out fashionably,  - and it is beautiful, and it is easily expanded, and it is free.

18

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K> Linux - it never was a desktop And NEVER WILL be, here in what all salt. And  in Linupsy everyones Core generally does not influence in any way propagation  - the same of 1 % at  in . (For even they  to remain without ) it is ridiculous, yes. A smilie just to a place. Upon it turns out very much the other way that Linux frequently  Windows. Considering that much flowed in Web, I any more do not know, what for to me to put Windows. Even it is more: my old  with Ubuntoj does not concede on productivity to twice more powerful  the wife on daily tasks. The software both there, and there costs almost identical, SSD also on both. In games we do not play. To work (in sense to program) more conveniently under Linux, on  is Windows to compile, check up and release to collect. What? Still TensorFlow under Windows is not able GPU to use - the most popular  . In a state sector more and more the people the Aster puts, under it also it is necessary to collect release. Personally for me it turns out that Ubunta and the Aster - mandatory OS which are really necessary. Windows it is already secondary.

19

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: > Will increase now features at VSCode to comparability from a Visual Studio or what will do? Not similar. It now more or less  for dynamic languages. For With ++,  and  it on high-grade IDE does not pull.

20

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

I so understand,  did not master? Well as a variant:  laziness to master. And in both variants on  realization of this fact presses, and it squeezes out from it to rationalize the behavior that pours out in similar texts, full of hatred

21

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

S> That is while this muttering of not taken place hopes. Well time you sit, on 4.7 means use all the same.Net Standard which is compatible with Core and, for Core now and write all new. Who does it write all new on core? Only promise

22

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, koenig, you wrote: S>> That is while this muttering of not taken place hopes. Well time you sit, on 4.7 means use all the same.Net Standard which is compatible with Core and, for Core now and write all new. K> who it writes all new on core? Only promise For example ASP.NET Core + Angular 2 template for a Visual Studio

23

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Kolesiki, you wrote: K> Hello, Serginio1, you wrote: K>>> Fortunately, it not MS solves, on what OS to sit to me and my clients - so I stopped on Win.NET 4.7 which suffices for eyes. S>> that is while this muttering of not taken place hopes. Well time you sit, on 4.7 means use all the same.Net Standard which we combine with Core K> Shta?? At me in a head porridge or you yet did not chew it? What else "Core"? I speak about Windows.NET 4.7 which is beaten by nails to Vende and which DOES NOT FOLLOW any standards - it simply is. And all jumps of IT macaques around is a temporary phenomenon.  "standards", them and  in 5 years. Linux - it never was a desktop And NEVER WILL be, here in what all salt. And  in Linupsy everyones Core generally does not influence in any way propagation  - the same of 1 % at  in . (For even they  to remain without ) You simply do not know that such Core and.Net Net Standard. With an output.Net Core 2 and.Net Standard you can already write  the code. Truth of Guj while for 10 , but using.Net Native nothing Dee K> DotNET is worse than yours - it it was necessary or to write at once humanly "transferred" (as Dzhabu), or not to soar to us a brain, to throw out confused VM and at once to do "the successor With ++" with  compilation (as now at Dee) and normal library. Already thousand programs are written strictly for Win.NET and to spring under a new pipe  (moreover not the most successful) - excuse, is not present either desires, nor courage - we grew wiser for so much years  . Anybody you does not ask to dance under a new pipe, millet new libraries will under.Net Standard which it is possible to use both in Core and in normal  K> I already at all  believe that if  the rich person will be enclosed in Dee,  again remains behind a board (as once it kicked on roadside Delphi). Only here to catch up MS cannot any more - it does not have such lucid minds, as then more. K> We with the big surprise read about ruin Sun - it would seem, such giant! And I at all will not be surprised, if in flow of 5 years them either disorganize in halves, or buy with giblets, giving  Nadelle. These children walk on thin ice on which investors blow. At them already as years 5 is.Net Native for UWP https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dotnet … ndard-2-0/ by the way they develop and Xaml Standard so will develop and WPF https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/wpf/20 … net-4-6-1/ Simply they did huge operation on transfer on  and developments.Net Native. Will Already move on libraries and Gujam

24

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> And in both variants on  realization of this fact presses, and it squeezes out from it to rationalize the behavior what pours out in similar texts, full of hatred That your way means to "master"? For a long time wanted to ask. Here to me in due time it was not necessary to "master" OS of EU of different versions. It simply worked. I drove in a command into the console or launched a packet of punched cards. Then read printouts. If that is not clear, looked docks. It, by the way, were one of the best docks among that I had to read. That is I "mastered" OS, fulfilling educational and-or production targets. About the same happened with MS DOS, the Windows or the Semiaxis or Vasikom built in "Spark-226". That is why Linux is necessary for "mastering" at first, and then already something on it to do?

25

Re: What for it is necessary to Visual Studio Code?

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: P> That your way means to "master"? For a long time wanted to ask. P> here to me in due time... It was not necessary to "master". It simply worked. This. ^ and that begins at companions "... Does not work... It is not intended..." And so on.