1

Topic: Why iphone?

Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? At the expense of what? Like long before it Bill Gates would say that they develop touch design. Like as all understood that behind it the future. When still there was the first iphone at  too there was a model with a stick. I.e. not with a finger you stick, and a stick. Why such difference in technologies? Like at  too money is? Or the Apple had any patents?

2

Re: Why iphone?

long wandered on  and smoking  to it the true ps at you what that  a question, ,  opened... Following will be - whence on the earth water?

3

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, Gattaka, you wrote: G> Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? At the expense of what? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bubJsaRK064

4

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, Gattaka, you wrote: G> Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? At the expense of what? IMHO the Author: Privalov Date: 27.08.15

5

Re: Why iphone?

G> Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? At the expense of what? It was necessary to develop an operating system and applications under fingers. It is banal but Steve was not too lazy to make it. Remaining persistently forced to use a stick that not always conveniently.

6

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, Gattaka, you wrote: G> Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? At the expense of what? All is simple! Because Steve Jobs the ingenious person! Took and made! While other wafers ...

7

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, Gattaka, you wrote: G> Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? At the expense of what? At what here technological break?! You what not the programmer? There is here no technological break. Simply Steve Jobs is able  any shit. And  while it was live.

8

Re: Why iphone?

A> Simply Steve Jobs is able  any shit. And  while it was live. And what not shit?

9

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> At what here technological break?! You what not the programmer? There is here no technological break. A> simply Steve Jobs is able  any shit. And  while it was live. Is interesting how many  can sell the, we tell so far not the advanced products, without it. In appearance like all as, the same queues consisting of vagabonds spending the night in boxes before shop, but something went not so. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxN9wMI2UeE

10

Re: Why iphone?

G> Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? At the expense of what? At last scientists opened a secret of longevity of hedgehogs. It appears, no secret is present. And they live not for long. Put not so much in Jobs's genius, how many that permitted to it. Unique, absolutely impossible in the modern large corporations of carte blanche on creation of such device which wants to see one specific person. Not a wild compound ( "compromise") from judgements of hundred Koreans. And not a fruit of the gloomy genius  which interrogated 100500 focus groups. And one specific person. Uncompromising. Not following the tastes of all the same, forgive RSDN, .

11

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, wamaco, you wrote: G>> Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? At the expense of what? W> All is simple! Because Steve Jobs the ingenious person! Unfortunately it there was one such

12

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: A>> Simply Steve Jobs is able  any shit. And  while it was live. T> and what not shit? Now in a mobile segment all shit. And shit, and identical shit is not simple. And once there was for example Nokia N810. Look that this such.

13

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> And once was for example Nokia810. A> Look that this such. Something on Microsoft? ... I do not have no horizontal slider with the keypad. To print on such it is a pleasure. It would seem that with today's technologies it is possible to make such smart phone and it will not be thick. And in the keypad also are additional the accumulator to thrust. So is not present!

14

Re: Why iphone?

A> And once was for example Nokia810. A> Look that this such.  yours the Nokia,  is better.

15

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: N> Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A>> And once was for example Nokia810. A>> Look that this such. N> Something on Microsoft? ... You did not look. And you look.

16

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: A>> And once was for example Nokia810. A>> Look that this such. T> your Hernja the Nokia,  is better. The fool.  is worse on any of parameters in spite of the fact that on 10 (ten, Charles!) years .

17

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> The fool.  is worse on any of parameters in spite of the fact that on 10 (ten, Charles!) years .  is worse on all parameters, except one: it is more convenient in usage in an everyday life of the normal person. It small, thin, it is not necessary to get a stylus, at it the good screen, the convenient OS ground under needs of the normal person.

18

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, mrTwister, you wrote: A>> The fool.  is worse on any of parameters in spite of the fact that on 10 (ten, Charles!) years . T> Ajfon is worse on all parameters, except one: it is more convenient in usage in an everyday life of the normal person. At "the normal person" one egg and one boob. T> it small, thin, it is not necessary to get a stylus, at it the good screen, the convenient OS ground under needs of the normal person. Oh it is not necessary. The normal person "uses" exactly one function - . It is not necessary to me to tell about "convenient OS" "ground" under "the normal person". He/she is the normal person it is ground under Ajfon. Thus "the normal person" cannot from it  even photos send. Only yesterday saw. Conveniently, yes.

19

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> You did not look. And you look. What to look? Google to me produced Nokia Ljumija 810. I remember them, it was not pleasant to me earlier. It is possible more reality?

20

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> At "the normal person" one egg and one boob. He/she is very unusual person A> Oh it is not necessary. The normal person "uses" exactly one function - . The normal person wants to get one hand phone from a pocket and to start to use it, without any styluses,  keypads and other delirium. The normal person wants to install application in two contacts on the screen without phone connection to the computer, search on the Internet of any files for programs, their downloading from dustbins, their copying on phone, setting. The normal person wants to have simple OS which can be controlled fingers with which help it is possible to start the necessary application in one contact. And this application should be high quality, the normal person would not like to be picked heaps of shit with hope to find there a pearl. And for this purpose it is necessary , , uniform , financial motivation of authors of programs. A> it is not necessary to me to tell about "convenient OS" "ground" under "the normal person". Why? A> it is the normal person it is ground under Ajfon. A> Thus "the normal person" cannot from it  even photos send. A> only yesterday saw. A> it is convenient, yes. A> And with nokia810 it, certainly, understood!

21

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, Nuzhny, you wrote: A>> You did not look. And you look. N> what to look? Google to me produced Nokia Ljumija 810. I remember them, it was not pleasant to me earlier. It is possible more reality?  on one . I apologize. It Meant here: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N810

22

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, Gattaka, you wrote: G> Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? Any. Practically everything that did , existed to it. Already in Newton it was possible to stick with a stylus. In my opinion, in patent bureau any selling rubbish which on any garbage produces  "piece of paper" - here for the account of it remaining sits and are forced not to enter for territory of "the rounded corners"!

23

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, Gattaka, you wrote: G> Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? At the expense of what? G> Like long before it Bill Gates would say that they develop touch design. Like as all understood that behind it the future. G> when still there was the first iphone at  too there was a model with a stick. I.e. not with a finger you stick, and a stick. Why such difference in technologies? Like at  too money is? Or the Apple had any patents? It is necessary to read live classics http://rsdn.org/forum/management/3773307 the Author: Gaperton Date: 14.04.10 In the world of technological startups difficult to check that it is possible to make a good product without disruptive technologies. Simply on good marketing and design for people.

24

Re: Why iphone?

G> Why apple made iphone? What technological break by it helped? At the expense of what? They were helped not by break, and a successful combination of already available technologies. It and , and the interface under fingers, and an infrastructure () both for users, and for developers, and marketing etc., etc. Separately all like was, but Appl united all in one product.

25

Re: Why iphone?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> And what not shit? The Earth at sea coast.