26

Re: Miracles

CM>> Nafiga? CC> Paging because. Also what? In Linux it is, and  is not present. Delete to itself  and anything bad does not happen.

27

Re: Miracles

Hello, gardener, you wrote: CM>>> Nafiga? CC>> Paging because. G> Also what? In Linux it is, and  is not present. Delete to itself  and anything bad does not happen. In linux unlink happens, and if the file is occupied, it and will dangle not anchored to file system

28

Re: Miracles

Hello, gardener, you wrote: G> Also what? In Linux it is, and  is not present. All there is, is simply made on another. G> delete to itself  and anything bad does not happen. That you  removal in  at all removal the Present removal happens in a background and then when all release a file.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

29

Re: Miracles

G>> Also what? In Linux it is, and  is not present. CC> All there is, is simply made on another. G>> delete to itself  and anything bad does not happen. CC> that you  removal in  at all removal CC> the Present removal happens in a background and then when all release a file. I it know all. Simply "Paging because" it not the answer. Well later it already chewed.

30

Re: Miracles

Hello, gardener, you wrote: G> I it know all. Simply "Paging because" it not the answer. Well later it already chewed. Well ,  as that not so approaches for detailed lectures. Here the approach verbum sapienti sat est is faster... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

31

Re: Miracles

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: Pzz>> But it is not clear, why the microsoftware did not go up to the end, removal blocked, and renaming - is not present. CC> Because inside they on a miscellaneous are arranged. At MS the file deletes removal immediately. At *nix removal if is rough on fingers that a file renames and from the user hides really to bang then. I perfectly know, how all is arranged in  (and it is not necessary so roughly, anybody there renames nothing, by the way). But a microsoftware nobody forced to make how they made. It is their free realized choice. And I am surprised, why it such vague.

32

Re: Miracles

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: Pzz>> another is more ridiculous. If on file system is "" files, the file system cannot be remounted in read-only. CC> Well it already as implement. Hinders nothing to make normally, except developer laziness well and sometimes reasons " the sea and is necessary once in a blue moon". At  the approach it is difficult to make in another way. Unless in the separate invisible directory to keep account  files, that  them at following assembling with the record rights.

33

Re: Miracles

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC> Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz>> But it is not clear, why the microsoftware did not go up to the end, removal blocked, and renaming - is not present. CC> Because inside they on a miscellaneous are arranged. At MS the file deletes removal immediately. At *nix removal if is rough on fingers that a file renames and from the user hides really to bang then. Here a lie. The file is marked on the removal, new discoveries of this file are impossible, and removal will be only when will be closed last FileObject. Thus, if closing  did not happen, removal can be cancelled.

34

Re: Miracles

35

Re: Miracles

Hello, mike_rs, you wrote: _> here a lie. I paraphrase: together with name object... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

36

Re: Miracles

Hello, itslave, you wrote: I> As that this post at all  with  in an adjacent branch about a unit testing, I would tell mismatch miracles  sudden to "wonderful discoveries". The keypad with poison do not splash... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>