1

Topic: Re: In to me are not pleasant (-)

2

Re: Re: In to me are not pleasant (-)

Hello, Vatakusi, you wrote: What it is not pleasant to you in Adzhajle and how you with it struggle? * to use not * it as minimalism in design, the talent does not suffice to draw beautifully, therefore we use a new trend - the circle + a small square =  turns out! As and Agile, " did not teach to write", and "the systems concept did not study" - therefore ALL in Agile, and there we understand!

3

Re: Re: In to me are not pleasant (-)

Hello, Vatakusi, you wrote: What it is not pleasant to you in Adzhajle and how you with it struggle? * to use not * in Excessive volume of operation. To write it is more today to rewrite tomorrow.

4

Re: Re: In to me are not pleasant (-)

Hello, Vatakusi, you wrote: Here such question ridiculous ripened: What it is not pleasant to you in Adzhajle and how you with it struggle? * to use not * all it is pleasant. It is necessary to take.

5

Re: Re: In to me are not pleasant (-)

Hello, Vatakusi, you wrote: Here such question ridiculous ripened: And truth the ridiculous.  - a piece rather fuzzy, from quite sensible thoughts to  marasmus.

6

Re: Re: In to me are not pleasant (-)

In Excessive volume of operation. To write it is more today to rewrite tomorrow. Like very much the other way? Today to make it is less. Not to do all "at once", and then not to clarify that half from turned out - not that it is necessary for people.

7

Re: Re: In to me are not pleasant (-)

Hello, ylem, you wrote:> in Excessive volume of operation. To write it is more today to rewrite tomorrow. Y> Like very much the other way? Today to make it is less. Not to do all "at once", and then not to clarify that half from turned out - not that it is necessary for people. Both extreme measures generate superfluous operation

8

Re: Re: In to me are not pleasant (-)

Hello, Vatakusi, you wrote: What it is not pleasant to you in Adzhajle and how you with it struggle? * to use * It is far free. Meetings, , sprints, sessions on planning is all takes away a lot of time. Its some aspects I and did not see in real. For example, working burndown chart and an exact prediction of periods on . That, from my point , it is unambiguously good: - fortnight sprints. To have at least time in two weeks something that is possible if and not  then to show - suitable start to Continuous Deployment. - . "For how many days I would make this task if all appeared how I thought" considerably accelerates an estimation. Management can peacefully increase it by empirical coefficient and inform to a manual in days. To struggle? And what for?

9

Re: Re: In to me are not pleasant (-)

Hello, Vatakusi, you wrote: Here such question ridiculous ripened: What it is not pleasant to you in Adzhajle and how you with it struggle? * to use not * Adzhajl frequently rolls down to such management implementation of "greedy" algorithm. I like the following description of this algorithm. The polar explorer landed in  for the winter. To it produced a dial-up of various products, and everything, deliveries more it is not foreseen on weather conditions till the spring. And here, if the polar explorer at first is  from a paunch meat with vodka, then a small fish with beer is closer by the spring at it remains only  in the minimum quantities, and the polar explorer can not live to a following transport. Precisely and in . Many managers shut eyes to real problems, preferring them to postpone on "then", lifting a priority of any buns and . Well and in such cases the end is a little predicted. Though it is faster a question to "managers", than to .