Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: P>>> That - present, under your recipe? A C>> That. The C>> any more is not enough Concept of a market socialism time Q> "the Market socialism" it about the same, as "the pregnant virgin". When the socialism becomes market, from turns to capitalism. Yes, such bosh drove in with all into the USSR. Knowing understand that the market is always and is shown on a miscellaneous. If what idiot counts that the market needs to be clamped, instead of to develop that learns a deficit, shadow economy, total dependence on officials and mandatory crash in the end of tortures. You esteem history of the USSR, can you will understand. Cs>> under this concept tried to develop Broz Tito in Yugoslavia, the Scandinavian countries, Dan Sjaopin in China. Q> in Yugoslavia Tito did not want to repeat the Soviet experiment with the agriculture, led to mass hunger, therefore left private traders in agriculture - here and all difference. In the Scandinavian countries capitalism in which the population pays huge taxes to freeloaders prospers. And in China no socialism is present for a long time, it would be time to recognize and understand at last it that there - most that on there is a wild capitalism. In due course, when it becomes more developed, there there will be social institutes of type of pension system but while they cannot allow it to themselves - money is necessary to capitalists on development. Calm down, at last, with the China and stop to talk nonsense. What inexpressible persistence to name black white, and white black! Note, Scandinavians and do not name the system socialist. And whether named, if there would be the positive example. Whether and not to you to solve has the right China to be called as socialist. Has and even more than the USSR. It is just necessary to understand that it is a development vector, instead of that that the socialism there is already constructed. Behind a socialism the future, because it on determination much more effective economic system with developed system of self-control (market). If pondered upon the concept offered by me that, possibly, understood that all that is offered is taken from the best world an expert, is already tested and yielded good results. Applying them we precisely only we benefit without any subjunctive moods. But I and it have not enough, as I see that we can receive decided advantage if we go by the way of a market socialism. The C>> the Scandinavian approach to me is more to liking, from nevertheless leans against common sense more and does not add ideology. Q> you have more to liking when you pay 60 % of surtax on which there live migrants from Asia? You, apparently, broadcast something about justice? Where it? You flies from cutlets learn to separate. And here this dullness obvious to us imposed from the outside. Or you think that it is possible only for us to impose any idiocy?