Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: Q>>> "the Market socialism" it about the same, as "the pregnant virgin". When the socialism becomes market, from turns to capitalism. Cs>> Yes, drove in such bosh with all into the USSR. Knowing understand that the market is always and is shown on a miscellaneous. If what idiot counts that the market needs to be clamped, instead of to develop that learns a deficit, shadow economy, total dependence on officials and mandatory crash in the end of tortures. You esteem history of the USSR, can you will understand. Q> the kid, I should not read this history, I in it of cores and itself can tell it. I perfectly know that happened in the USSR that there clamped the market and consequently for a long time acquired that the socialism (that is market clamping) is a rare shit with which it is necessary to struggle the same as with fascism. It is not unique, attempts to liquidate the market met in the history though and it is rare, but for some reason people again would like to walk smack in this shit. You can be understood, I really kid and did not find Stalin and Khruschev's time. Can at this time really was. So, tell that you remember? Q> so, once again, "socialism" == "absence of the market". If in your concept there is a market, if you please to name it in another way. Because the word "socialism" is already occupied. As this word is called that was in the USSR. And wrong it cannot be on determination, state it so silly, how to tell that Kavendish opened wrong hydrogen, or incorrectly named it. The USSR constructed a socialism, therefore and named it as considered it necessary. And you who such to give it other titles and to take away it to yourself? At the first socialism in Paraguay and at the Lenin NEW ECONOMIC POLICY the market did not clamp. Why to Stalin you grant the right to usurp a word "socialism", and to me to return initial sense are not present? A C>> What inexpressible persistence to name black white, and white black! Note, Scandinavians and do not name the system socialist. Q> is not present, road, it you note! It you with companions with enviable obstinacy name this system socialist and who to you granted on this right? Scandinavians did not give it! Why I need to ask permission to speak at them? Their reforms went under the social justice slogan, and it is a way at a socialism in initial sense, instead of yours. Q>>> you have more to liking when you pay 60 % of surtax on which there live migrants from Asia? You, apparently, broadcast something about justice? Where it? A C>> You flies from cutlets learn to separate. And here this dullness obvious to us imposed from the outside. Or you think that it is possible only for us to impose any idiocy? Q> that for a mere verbiage? To decrypt? Considering your age, please: delivery of migrants in the European countries is imposed from the outside, the majority of the population against it. But to them do not listen, as did not listen to the majority which wanted to save the USSR.