1

Topic: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

You (qwertyuiop) stated the remark under article effective economy (+ continuation) about that what well to present specific reforms for Russia. Specific proposals to develop not simply, and on all necessary reforms especially. For this purpose it is necessary to have enough possibilities, first of all time. Tried only the very first. Wrote reversal to Pavel Grudininu. In details to count it did not turn out, but digits in a sentence are made not up. I know that you not badly understand economy. I ask to criticize, but also to offer too. I ask to join all.

2

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

3

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: a C> I Know that you not badly understand economy. Thanks,  the Expert in economy think that money between banks transports by trucks And between the countries the whole compositions ply.

4

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: Not absolutely understood that the author considers as a socialism to which it is necessary to pass gradually. Country disorder on the sample of the USSR will be the total of reforms, probably?

5

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: a C> I Know that you not badly understand economy. I ask to criticize, but also to offer too. I ask to join all. Qwerty does not understand at all economy. Therefore over it all forum also neighs.

6

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

7

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: S> Not absolutely understood that the author considers as a socialism to which it is necessary to pass gradually. Country disorder on the sample of the USSR will be the total of reforms, probably? The author does not consider that in the USSR there was a socialism.

8

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: a C>> I Know that you not badly understand economy. I ask to criticize, but also to offer too. I ask to join all. A> Qwerty does not understand at all economy. Therefore over it all forum also neighs. Simply you read it not in those places.

9

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: A>> Qwerty does not understand at all economy. Therefore over it all forum also neighs. A C> Simply you read it not in those places. He that, in different places writes opposite things?

10

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, anonymous, you wrote: A>>> Qwerty does not understand at all economy. Therefore over it all forum also neighs. A C>> Simply you read it not in those places. A> he that, in different places writes opposite things? At least writes much. Strongly utopian things at it did not note. Well money carries, well and that. Think, how it on wires to run?

11

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: A>> Qwerty does not understand at all economy. Therefore over it all forum also neighs. A C> Simply you read it not in those places. Well, the number of Pi too contains "War and peace" in any place, simply nobody knows in what. It seems that to you qwerty it is not necessary. Everything that knows qwerty is a content of the book of Pol Hejne "Economic mentality". It seems that he read only this book, and all. Therefore it such ridiculous. Read this book itself and all. Only do not stop on the unique book, and that at you will laugh in the same way.

12

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: S>> Not absolutely understood that the author considers as a socialism to which it is necessary to pass gradually. Country disorder on the sample of the USSR will be the total of reforms, probably?> the Author does not consider a C that in the USSR there was a socialism. Probably, I insufficiently distinctly asked... I Repeat a question the selected.

13

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: S>>> Not absolutely understood that the author considers as a socialism to which it is necessary to pass gradually. Country disorder on the sample of the USSR will be the total of reforms, probably?>> the Author does not consider a C that in the USSR there was a socialism. S> it is visible, I insufficiently distinctly asked... I Repeat a question the selected. And here about what! So about a socialism I here wrote a heap of posts. Even collected them together.

14

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: S>>>> Not absolutely understood that the author considers as a socialism to which it is necessary to pass gradually. Country disorder on the sample of the USSR will be the total of reforms, probably?>>> the Author does not consider a C that in the USSR there was a socialism. S>> it is visible, I insufficiently distinctly asked... I Repeat a question the selected. A C> And here about what! So about a socialism I here wrote a heap of posts. Even collected them together. At once errors are visible. 1. Anarchy is named by a socialism 2. The mass of workers is co-owners of the enterprises under capitalism

15

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote:> You read a C further? From this total undertakes very little. The tax burden is shifted on rich, and that not everything, but those which are excepted by means from manufacture. The C> Non-productive sphere is a supply and rest of employees, building of rest houses, arrangement of territories and other. All is easily supervised. Building of any object is an industrial sphere. Yours TO. Here see, even at such level of judgement disperse and to supervise easily it does not turn out.

16

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: There are reasonable elements. But so that I against the strong changes. I gradually would start to implement social any elements, first of all more floppy labor market. For example there is an idea for self-occupied to make initially compensating if incomes of their activity less .  to lift thousand to 15 in a month, but again  to raise flexibility, for example to give the chance to employers to employ people for 8 hour working day for 15 or on 6 sentry for 12. That at people was more choice, more than different variants to provide itself with means of subsistence. You are pleasant to you to cut for example nested dolls, and instead at office .  nested dolls of year 2-3, at first the state pays extra you the manual as self-occupied, looked at the income in 3 years, yes it is impossible to live on it, went the programmer to work. It is necessary that the state gave the chance to people to try that that to search for the

17

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: S>>>>> Not absolutely understood that the author considers as a socialism to which it is necessary to pass gradually. Country disorder on the sample of the USSR will be the total of reforms, probably?>>>> the Author does not consider a C that in the USSR there was a socialism. S>>> it is visible, I insufficiently distinctly asked... I Repeat a question the selected. A C>> And here about what! So about a socialism I here wrote a heap of posts. Even collected them together. S> errors At once are visible. S> 1. Anarchy is named by a socialism Since difference of a socialism from capitalism in three basic conditions: 1. In the socialist state the big value-added tax for the inheritance, therefore progressive surtax is imposed becomes less. The start capital, accordingly to earn a state not a problem and without the inheritance is given to each citizen. 2. Criminal prosecution of the unfair transaction is entered. All transactions only at market prices. As consequence, the prohibition of donation operates. Impossible there is a racket and any other gratuitous transmission of the property, for example, to children. 3. Criminal prosecution of unearned incomes. It is possible to spend only that earned itself. Anybody, neither the official, nor the adult child of the rich person cannot spend more than that earned, paying taxes. In what anarchy? Or capitalism too anarchy? S> 2. The mass of workers is co-owners of the enterprises under capitalism I Hope for you there will be no discovery what under the modern capitalism mass of workers already frequently co-owners? What in it erratic?

18

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote:> the Author does not consider a C that in the USSR there was a socialism. !

19

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote:>> You read a C further? From this total undertakes very little. The tax burden is shifted on rich, and that not everything, but those which are excepted by means from manufacture. The C>> Non-productive sphere is a supply and rest of employees, building of rest houses, arrangement of territories and other. All is easily supervised. M> building of any object is an industrial sphere. Yours TO. Here see, even at such level of judgement disperse and to supervise easily it does not turn out. It for the company which builds, and 20 % will be paid by those for which build. If it same builds to herself non-productive objects 20 % and a system pay. Translated industrial object in non-productive, pay 20 % from residual cost. That difficult for control?

20

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote:>> the Author does not consider a C that in the USSR there was a socialism. A> Orriginalno! Now it can and it seems original. But transits time, and build the USSR a socialism will not name, only unsuccessful attempt to construct a socialism.

21

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

C> If it same builds to herself non-productive objects 20 % and a system pay. Translated industrial object in non-productive, pay 20 % from residual cost. A C> That difficult for control? Difficult in classification that there are industrial objects and that there are non-productive. It will be generated tens volumes of reference manuals and qualifiers, to them of hundred volumes of exceptions. On support of this economy people will be necessary that in the light of declared staff reduction looks funny. It only in the first a sight seems easily.

22

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Hello, Dym On, you wrote: a C>> If it same builds to herself non-productive objects 20 % and a system pay. Translated industrial object in non-productive, pay 20 % from residual cost. A C>> That difficult for control? DO> it is difficult in classification that there are industrial objects and that there are non-productive. It will be generated tens volumes of reference manuals and qualifiers, to them of hundred volumes of exceptions. On support of this economy people will be necessary that in the light of declared staff reduction looks funny. It only in the first a sight seems easily. What for? For idiots? In the company all all perfectly know that industrial, and that are not present. If something is not obvious as is used, will be treated in favor of the company. But expenditure for cooperative societies, sanatoria, rest houses, tourist bases and an accomplishment of territories precisely not the industrial.

23

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

24

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

25

Re: 2qwertyuiop - About specific economic sentences

Cs> As soon as money leave the company in holding or child so leave manufacture and 20 % are paid. What means money leave? How you represent it to yourselves?