Hello, siberia2, you wrote: S>>>>> Not absolutely understood that the author considers as a socialism to which it is necessary to pass gradually. Country disorder on the sample of the USSR will be the total of reforms, probably?>>>> the Author does not consider a C that in the USSR there was a socialism. S>>> it is visible, I insufficiently distinctly asked... I Repeat a question the selected. A C>> And here about what! So about a socialism I here wrote a heap of posts. Even collected them together. S> errors At once are visible. S> 1. Anarchy is named by a socialism Since difference of a socialism from capitalism in three basic conditions: 1. In the socialist state the big value-added tax for the inheritance, therefore progressive surtax is imposed becomes less. The start capital, accordingly to earn a state not a problem and without the inheritance is given to each citizen. 2. Criminal prosecution of the unfair transaction is entered. All transactions only at market prices. As consequence, the prohibition of donation operates. Impossible there is a racket and any other gratuitous transmission of the property, for example, to children. 3. Criminal prosecution of unearned incomes. It is possible to spend only that earned itself. Anybody, neither the official, nor the adult child of the rich person cannot spend more than that earned, paying taxes. In what anarchy? Or capitalism too anarchy? S> 2. The mass of workers is co-owners of the enterprises under capitalism I Hope for you there will be no discovery what under the modern capitalism mass of workers already frequently co-owners? What in it erratic?