51

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> well then I have quite the right to write: M> "tasks which they before army of the Russian Federation and mercenaries in Syria stand, seemingly, do not solve generally." M> note those, I state nothing Perfectly. From me what response is expected? What at I will rush to prove the reverse? I will not rush. How to estimate results of activity in Syria is a question of a faith at present.

52

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, 0x7be, you wrote: 0> And who such "" in a context of the given arguing? These are all, who not in sect " - all".

53

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, Anatoly Shirokov, you wrote: > But, I look, you with ease are scattered by strangers, as true . A unique question: and who you such to solve who should remain, who should leave? Come on choices, dethrone Putin who does not give to you? Or so not ? So  bad, does not allow to dethrone on choices.

54

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, HPR, you wrote: HPR> So it is necessary to help the friend-friend on-possibility.  did not help, Mugabe did not help. And after all could!

55

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, MShura, you wrote: MS> I Suppose he did not look, and simply does not reflex. Looked certainly and with the wife considered. You badly represent that in a head at  from bloody  in the lock on a hill of the USA is created.

56

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, ML380, you wrote: ML> Why to me should be not  these three? At what not  on so many that from the taxes paid their protection. Any  moods. It should not be finite . Responsible citizens of EU and the USA, for example, did not regret the money that them to dethrone.

57

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, ML380, you wrote: ML> Why to me should be not  these three? Your right, certainly ML> At what not  on so many that from the taxes paid their protection. You can in a legal field: 1. To vote on choices 2. To cease to pay taxes, for example, moving to other country - but there taxes it is necessary to pay anyway, simply they will leave now on other hogwash, on which to you

58

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> that misters patriots after  this video tell? M> 1. In  a victory or flight? In the short-range east - it is impossible to win civil war. Therefore adequately left. And it is correct.

59

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, alsemm, you wrote: A> Any  moods. It should not be finite . It why it? A> responsible citizens of EU and the USA, for example, did not regret the money that them to dethrone. And it is their problems. But if decided to follow an example these countries why not to begin with quality of roads?

60

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, ML380, you wrote: ML> But if decided to follow an example these countries why not to begin with quality of roads? Here it also is a victory  moods: we have a budget on roads, but there are no builders of these roads because all involved think only of the , plundering this budget and constructing poor-quality roads then again to plunder the budget. So here to you not  on taxes on  and  on taxes to roads. Again someone should be baked about your interests, but why?

61

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, Vi2, you wrote: Vi2> Again someone should be baked about your interests, but why? In system with choices because differently I will vote for those who is baked (aha, as In EU and the USA). Into the account of the Russian Federation you are right - no means of influence for a situation at me are present, it is necessary to achieve fair choices only. The most ridiculous that all who considers that its hut not with edge and something does you and by the first will offend.

62

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, ML380, you wrote: ML> In system with choices because differently I will vote for those who is baked (aha, as In EU and the USA). Into the account of the Russian Federation you are right - no means of influence for a situation at me are present, it is necessary to achieve fair choices only. In any system, and you prove it the example, everyone is baked about the and only about the interests. Quits in your interests that in the country did not build qualitative roads, and you justify it that supposedly I participate in choices, and those who is baked should win them. Only this method does not give result, unless you do not see? The one who comes to power, starts to type the pocket, instead of to do qualitative roads. ML> the most ridiculous that all who considers that its hut not with edge and something does you and by the first will offend. I will not be, but all question - that it "something".

63

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, Vi2, you wrote: Vi2> a pier, I participate in choices, and those who is baked should win them. Only this method does not give result, unless you do not see? It because is not present at us choices. There is at the best a voting.

64

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, Anatoly Shirokov, you wrote: > Hello, HPR, you wrote: >>> But you  and without reflecting you will give the life for light ideals . HPR>> That and for what to me to give it is known only to me and it is exact not your mind put. > But, I look, you with ease are scattered by strangers, as true . A unique question: and who you such to solve who should remain, who should leave? Come on choices, dethrone Putin who does not give to you? Or so not ? And it at me still the imagination was played it appears. It was necessary to explain the hardware sense of a post with pictures  dictators. And I dispose of lives, and Putin I dethrone. Yes  to me on it, let selects itself though hundred times to . One horse-radish its destiny or physiology will dare or street. I hope then Asad does not throw it and too comes to the rescue, and that not on  turns out.

65

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, HPR, you wrote: HPR> It is possible to continue further - it thus, on distant approaches, protects itself. It is destiny almost all sat up on a throne. At them the fear of loss of the power and a feeding trough is combined with fear to be torn to pieces as was with Kaddafi and other. So it is necessary to help the friend-friend on-possibility. It you now about Merkel?

66

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, alsemm, you wrote: A> Hello, HPR, you wrote: HPR>> So it is necessary to help the friend-friend on-possibility. A> Kaddafi did not help, Mugabe did not help. And after all could! But Asadu were in time, Maduro here the credit with lordly, fie an imperial shoulder, look stretches still half a year.  here keeps, rockets launches. So Putin's business lives and wins, companions!

67

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, Stanislaw K, you wrote: SK> Hello, HPR, you wrote: HPR>> It is possible to continue further - it thus, on distant approaches, protects itself. It is destiny almost all sat up on a throne. At them the fear of loss of the power and a feeding trough is combined with fear to be torn to pieces as was with Kaddafi and other. So it is necessary to help the friend-friend on-possibility. SK> it you now about Merkel? No, she not on a throne sits. And is faster in a seat, quite budgetary.

68

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> that misters patriots after  this video tell? The muzhik tries to make a beautiful mine at the bad game. Its forecasts did not justify. Couple of years back it predicted the full defeat of Asada and Iran, and as other-wordly losses from our side. Upon all quitted on the contrary. As to an output of our armies and the declaration of a victory over , it from a part slyness.  that really crushed, but  from  were stupidly recoloured in green and will annoy while in it for it pay (and to pay in it hardly cease). The marksman frankly is not objective. He can be understood. He wanted a military victory in Ukraine, and forces are sprayed (in its judgement) to Syria.

69

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> and who did not look, the request not to make comments. M> and that is what that a trend among patriots, not only not to look, but with pride it to declare. So after all misters apologists of the western values so much already sad shit here dragged that all and will not reconsider. All and so a long time who is already clear you is and than .

70

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> well then I have quite the right to write: M> "tasks which they before army of the Russian Federation and mercenaries in Syria stand, seemingly, do not solve generally." Have the right. There is official statistics, archives of mass-media of the countries  democracies in which there is a card of territories captured  for a moment before input of armies of the Russian Federation, and cards at the moment of an output. Is in archives of mass-media and announcement of Asada, what for he invites armies of the Russian Federation, what tasks it puts. M> note those, I state nothing One thing here you all the same state...

71

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, ML380, you wrote: ML> It because is not present at us choices. There is at the best a voting. It at you is not present a choice so it at  and should not be.

72

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, Vi2, you wrote: Vi2> It at you is not present a choice, It is possible to think at you is. Vi2> so it at  also should not be.  you dexterously solved for the whole category of the population.

73

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, HPR, you wrote: HPR> But Asadu were in time, Maduro here the credit with lordly, fie an imperial shoulder, look stretches still half a year.  here keeps, rockets launches. So Putin's business lives and wins, companions! Madura Chineses has more than us distance money. Too fools?

74

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, ML380, you wrote: ML> It is possible to think at you is. At me is, and I do not find fault with that happens, applying the forces. ML> you dexterously solved Eko for the whole category of the population. On that they also are that - grumble also do nothing. Here also there should not be a choice.

75

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: M>> that is you suppose that Marksmen is less patriotic than you? A> Taki yes. A> Marksmen explicitly itself loves more than Russia. A> also it is capable to operate to it to the detriment. That is the person who in practice proved that is ready to protect interests of Russia up in arms, for you is less patriotic... Interesting that you while it rescued the population  from junta did both organized there armed resistance and was at war? Wrote "hurrah-patriotic" posts on ? Or can on marsh  as the correct patriot? Very convenient patriotism at you, being at home with beer on a sofa in front of the monitor. With such patriots and enemies it is not necessary, all defile