1

Topic: And what, won Syria?

What misters patriots after  this video tell? 1. In  a victory or flight? 2. What about struggle on  approaches? And who did not look, the request not to make comments. And that is what that a trend among patriots, not only not to look, but with pride it to declare. The link

2

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> that misters patriots after  this video tell? I how many did not try to learn that there for war in Syria so anything and did not understand. One tell one, others another. Turbidly, too turbidly. One speak lost, others speak won. What won, whom won? What sense was to win? Like the USA and Russia were against , i.e. in this operation they on one side were. So? Then why the USA did not approve action of Russia? ., Russians plainly do not understand that there happens, but (as on football) it would be desirable to show patriotism and participation. On it invent various interpretation to own advantage. Z.Y.generally  for normal people to create a site-educational program that it was possible to understand where who won. Only it is short not to spend time a great lot.

3

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> One speak lost, others speak won. What won, whom won? What sense was to win? Kaddafi Saddam Hussein Asad Vot to you and result.

4

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: S>> One speak lost, others speak won. What won, whom won? What sense was to win? M> Kaddafi M> Saddam Hussein M> Asad M> Here to you and result. What this relation has to stated in video? You can show a half-sweat photo still.

5

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> and who did not look, the request not to make comments. Smart  and the visitor shaking. In the end of each roller on the channel a fragment from a suite "Time, forward!" Sviridov (a picture in the program "Time") - directly mi-mi. And what for you these dialogues from a madhouse look? Really there is nothing more decently on a subject " - all"? On a subject: tasks which they before army of the Russian Federation and mercenaries in Syria stand, seemingly, solves quite successfully. And won or not - I do not know. In what there the victory should be?

6

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, alsemm, you wrote: M>> and who did not look, the request not to make comments. A> smart  and the visitor shaking. In the end of each roller on the channel a fragment from a suite "Time, forward!" Sviridov (a picture in the program "Time") - directly mi-mi. A> And what for you these dialogues from a madhouse look? Really there is nothing more decently on a subject " - all"? A> On a subject: tasks which they before army of the Russian Federation and mercenaries in Syria stand, seemingly, solves quite successfully. And won or not - I do not know. In what there the victory should be? In what a victory nobody knows, in it that all and business. And about solved tasks also there is an arguing on video. Similar that there anything also did not solve if to trust dudes from video. At you similar any information allowing to add or refute their expressions is not present?

7

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> that misters patriots after  this video tell? Some insult on the power in talk of these two is felt. M> 1. In  a victory or flight? Tasks in Syria are fulfilled. M> 2. What about struggle on  approaches? While, like, normally. And what? M> and who did not look, the request not to make comments. M> and that is what that a trend among patriots, not only not to look, but with pride it to declare. Well looked. Also what? M> the link

8

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, B0FEE664, you wrote: M>> that misters patriots after  this video tell? BFE> some insult on the power in talk of these two Is felt. M>> 1. In  a victory or flight? BFE> tasks in Syria are fulfilled. M>> 2. What about struggle on  approaches? BFE> while, like, normally. And what? M>> and who did not look, the request not to make comments. M>> and that is what that a trend among patriots, not only not to look, but with pride it to declare. BFE> well looked. Also what? That is you do not agree with their judgement on results and consequences?

9

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> that misters patriots after  this video tell? It seems that Syria won also Strelkova too. If Marksmen really was the patriot, he would tell absolutely other words. At least would not stretch an owl on a stub.

10

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: M>> that misters patriots after  this video tell? A> It seems that Syria won also Strelkova too. A> If Marksmen really was the patriot, A> he would tell absolutely other words. A> at least would not stretch an owl on a stub. That is you suppose that Marksmen is less patriotic than you?

11

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> in what a victory nobody knows, in it that all and business. In what local conflicts was on another? M> and about solved tasks also there is an arguing on video. Similar that there anything also did not solve if to trust dudes from video. What can they consider, news from the TV set? They there were not also any other information sources that there  at them is not present. Can at mister Girkina and there are drjazja-friends who in Syria are at war and regularly it is reported that is is specific round them becomes, but patterns as a whole two  precisely have no these. They scratch on a subject that all is bad, all disappeared. Their antipodes scratch about continuous victories. They thus consider the same news. To sense to look all of them?

12

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, alsemm, you wrote: M>> in what a victory nobody knows, in it that all and business. A> in what local conflicts was on another? M>> and about solved tasks also there is an arguing on video. Similar that there anything also did not solve if to trust dudes from video. A> that they can consider, news from the TV set? They there were not also any other information sources that there  at them is not present. Can at mister Girkina and there are drjazja-friends who in Syria are at war and regularly it is reported that is is specific round them becomes, but patterns as a whole two  precisely have no these. They scratch on a subject that all is bad, all disappeared. Their antipodes scratch about continuous victories. They thus consider the same news. To sense to look all of them? That is you want to tell that anybody from telling on this subject actually does not know that happens? And what results? You stated that tasks dare in  successfully? It turns out that you too tell a lie?

13

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> you can show a half-sweat photo still. The photo Pol Pot abreast is not laid down. The USA did not declare the purpose its overthrow.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

14

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, pagid, you wrote: M>> you can show a half-sweat photo still. P> a photo Pol Pot abreast is not laid down. The USA did not declare the purpose its overthrow. With  there is no communication either at a half-sweat photo, or at other photos, at your message. Can add a photo  between tea sorts in indium and in shri-lanke. It as will not concern questions considered on video.

15

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> that is you want to tell that anybody from telling on this subject actually does not know that happens? And what results? These two know nothing besides that in the TV set about it speak. M> you stated that tasks dare in  successfully? It turns out that you too tell a lie? Literally I wrote the following: On a subject: tasks which they before army of the Russian Federation and mercenaries in Syria stand, seemingly, solves quite successfully. Where here the statement?

16

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> with  there is no communication either at a half-sweat photo, or at other photos, at your message. To consider video, it is necessary to look at it. And here on  your attempt to deliver in this row Pol Pot it is possible to specify without video review. M> it as will not concern questions considered on video. What for then Pol Pot mentioned? Photos of Kaddafi, Saddam and Asada had a direct bearing on questions considered on video, anyway if the topic title concerns video.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

17

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, alsemm, you wrote: A> Literally I wrote the following: A> A> On a subject: tasks which they before army of the Russian Federation and mercenaries in Syria stand, seemingly, solves quite successfully. A> where here the statement? It on yours not the statement? Well then I have quite the right to write: "tasks which they before army of the Russian Federation and mercenaries in Syria stand, seemingly, do not solve generally." Note those, I state nothing

18

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, pagid, you wrote: M>> with  there is no communication either at a half-sweat photo, or at other photos, at your message. P> to consider video, it is necessary to look at it. And here on  your attempt to deliver in this row Pol Pot it is possible to specify without video review. M>> it as will not concern questions considered on video. P> what for then Pol Pot mentioned? P> Fotografii Kaddafi, Saddam and Asada had a direct bearing on questions considered on video, anyway if the topic title concerns video. That is predictably, videos did not look, but actively make comments on a photo of these mongrels, sadists and the murderers equal , , to half-sweat and , have rather mediated relation to subjects considered on video.

19

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> that is predictably, videos did not look, but actively make comments M> on a photo of these mongrels, sadists and the murderers equal , , to half-sweat and , Forgot Bush and Obama which are the most worse set forth above.

20

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> that is predictably, videos did not look, but actively make comments so. M> the photo of these mongrels, sadists and the murderers equal , , half-sweat and , M> have rather mediated relation to subjects considered on video. But has a direct bearing to  to a subject. And these mongrels from our belltower are not worse than mongrels Bush, Obama, Clinton.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

21

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: M>> that misters patriots after  this video tell? S> I how many did not try to learn that there for war in Syria so anything and did not understand. One tell one, others another. Turbidly, too turbidly. Two experts across Russia ... gathered

22

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: Formulate the purposes which as you consider, Russia in Syria put. Then already also it is possible to consider, won (reached objects in view) or not.

23

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> and that is what that a trend among patriots, not only not to look, but with pride it to declare. The trend is by the own words theses to retell. Not all are pleasant like video though perhaps it is pleasant to anti-patriots and patriots - cannot state. M> the link of Marksmen it is not so right taking into account what even those groupings had large losses, including territorial.  already not the state, and saboteurs. Last also is the main things advantage that religious obscurantists tired out far away and utilized in good amounts.

24

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> that misters patriots And who such "" in a context of the given arguing tell?

25

Re: And what, won Syria?

Hello, metall74, you wrote: M> and who did not look, the request not to make comments. The request it is refused.