Hello, Denwer, you wrote: D> That means to produce poverty? You whence know whom there will be the adult child who has grown in a poor family? And how many scientists grew in ? How many children grew after war without fathers, lived from a loaf to a loaf and became outstanding scientists, doctors, inventors, designers. Well here think who you such and who for example Bokerija (the cardiologist which). You need to be lulled simply now, because against Bokerija you easier zero. Why you think, what your current earnings are more important for the country? Especially for Abramovich you generally differ nothing from the vagabond at station ZHD, on its gradation you too it is necessary in the expenditure. You, apparently, misunderstand. I understand it absolutely differently. Important not an absolute amount of money, and a taken place and a role in society. Post-war years were heavy for all country and I at all would not began to name those people beggars or cattle. At them, in mass, was everything is all right with motivation, vital setting. The poor prosperity was only temporal problem which is not dependent on people. And if today when conditions for development and possibility of self-realization are unlike wider, people have enough brains only on thumping cheap alcohol, to degrade and breed - that here it is already possible to ask a question about cattle and poverty.