76

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Sammo, you wrote: S>> Recession began in 2016. Before there was rise S> How much I remember, just on recurrence there should be a recession, but approximately since 2010 could deduce in small rise. I also mean it, when I say that try  recession. Truly. Putin simply shook a wave instead of it to smooth. And not he one - Brezhnev as tried to make

77

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, pagid, you wrote: S>> That is, 20 years ago was born less girls of what the future the situation economic worsens? P> on  birth rate influences not a prime number of women at genital age, but also (partly their husbands) desire to have children and that how many children they wish to have them. Indeed. But this desire - almost a constant the last 10 years. Unlike number of young women.

78

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: S> But this desire - almost a constant the last 10 years. Nothing confirmed .... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

79

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Vedmed, you wrote: LN>>> it is necessary not to aspire to a birth of children at any cost, and to increase of a standard of living of people >> the modern experience shows that increase of a standard of living leads to birth rate lowering> Thus the amusing statistics - superrich (Rothschilds, for example) often having many children Because they do not have problems to combine life for themselves and education of children. There is a servants staff.

80

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> Hello, SomeOne_TT, you wrote: CC>>> Here such here a variant. SO _>> wildness and obscurantism. N> why?? Because any uncle who prays to the imaginary friend solves for all girls in the country as it to live and that for them it is good. In a century when the underwater ships plow open spaces of oceans, the muzhik in a skirt dares to state that formation not is the blessing for the person if at this person other composition of hormones and is present a uterus. I do not see a special difference between this sentence and a sentence to manufacture lamp shades from a skin of gipsies.

81

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> P.S. I, by the way, too think that at us too many people go into higher education. On statistican, whether 60, whether even 80 percent of graduates of schools arrive in HIGH SCHOOLS. In what good it does not result, so much people with higher education are not necessary to economy. As a result, training level in HIGH SCHOOLS falls, the people with the diploma do operation where any diploma and it is not required and to go to work as the simple seller in shop, it is necessary generally  from the neighboring countries to deliver. You see the intelligency objects to that in kindergartens of an ass to children nurses without higher education wipe...

82

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Vedmed, you wrote: Thus the amusing statistics - superrich (Rothschilds, for example) often having many children because they clever

83

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, v6, you wrote: v6> PS Poor financially - can bring up the genius. Poor mentally and morally - hardly probable. The genius cannot be brought up

84

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Denwer, you wrote: v6>> To what you  murder? Anybody about murder did not speak (you do not consider condoms as weapons of mass destruction? And that after all each time some millions potential the person are killed.) . D> I wrote it to that while the child does not grow up, it begins impossible to tell whom it, the genius or  cattle. At the moment of condom usage it is impossible to make any outputs about the future child, therefore we wait 21 years and we make the decision upon. Here from here and murder. Any pseudo-humanism. Give we produce one million person and we throw all on , perhaps one of them takes place the genius, and remaining are not necessary, let become an inveterate drunkard, idle, are imprisoned etc. not easier to take a smaller amount of children and to create for them the best conditions for development? Efficiency it will be explicit above. On a subject with murders I will not make comments, nonsense any. v6>> PS poor financially - can bring up the genius. Poor mentally and morally - hardly probable. D> as we quickly passed that from the monetary poor to the mental poor. How it has something in common with words "to produce poverty"? How to define the mental poor? Anywhere did not pass, the term "cattle" figured from the very beginning.

85

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: v6>> PS Poor financially - can bring up the genius. Poor mentally and morally - hardly probable. > the genius cannot be brought up but spoiled - easily

86

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, pagid, you wrote: S>> But this desire - almost a constant the last 10 years. P> nothing confirmed . Here for such data search!

87

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, v6, you wrote: v6> Any pseudo-humanism. Give we produce one million person and we throw all on , perhaps one of them takes place the genius, and remaining are not necessary, let become an inveterate drunkard, idle, are imprisoned etc. not easier to take a smaller amount of children and to create for them the best conditions for development? Efficiency it will be explicit above. Minute what means "let become an inveterate drunkard" and "perhaps becomes"? You made any efforts education or the content of my children? Or someone's else? Whose children you plan to "take", where, and what it, actually, means? Generally, how you are involved in performance/default of these slogans?

88

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, v6, you wrote: >> the genius cannot be brought up v6> But to spoil - easily yes, such probability is

89

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Vedmed, you wrote: >> the modern experience shows that increase of a standard of living leads to birth rate lowering Thus the amusing statistics - superrich (Rothschilds, for example) often having many children the Amusing statistics - superrich (Tsukerberg, for example) are often married to Asians. Well you understood, yes?

90

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> Only that natural natural demographic recession has been caused not by "wave", and end of conditions of rise of birth rate second half 80. Why you so think?

91

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, L.Long, you wrote: v6>> Any pseudo-humanism. Give we produce one million person and we throw all on , perhaps one of them takes place the genius, and remaining are not necessary, let become an inveterate drunkard, idle, are imprisoned etc. not easier to take a smaller amount of children and to create for them the best conditions for development? Efficiency it will be explicit above. LL> minute what means "let become an inveterate drunkard" and "perhaps becomes"? You made any efforts education or the content of my children? Or someone's else? Whose children you plan to "take", where, and what it, actually, means? Generally, how you are involved in performance/default of these slogans? I against slogans of clericals "breed all at any cost, the native land in danger". All remaining - your imaginations.

92

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Vedmed, you wrote: Thus the amusing statistics - superrich (Rothschilds, for example) often having many children Sampling very small.

93

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Vedmed, you wrote:>> Thus the amusing statistics - superrich (Rothschilds, for example) often having many children v6>> the Amusing statistics - superrich (Tsukerberg, for example) are often married to Asians. v6>> well you understood, yes?> Not, did not understand. Who there from the superrich is married to Asians? Where statistics by an amount of children superrich? One case is not statistics. You now will recall Abramovich, and so two cases - too yet statistics.

94

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, v6, you wrote: v6>>> Any pseudo-humanism. Give we produce one million person and we throw all on , perhaps one of them takes place the genius, and remaining are not necessary, let become an inveterate drunkard, idle, are imprisoned etc. not easier to take a smaller amount of children and to create for them the best conditions for development? Efficiency it will be explicit above. LL>> minute what means "let become an inveterate drunkard" and "perhaps becomes"? You made any efforts education or the content of my children? Or someone's else? Whose children you plan to "take", where, and what it, actually, means? Generally, how you are involved in performance/default of these slogans? v6> I against slogans of clericals "breed all at any cost, the native land in danger". All remaining - your imaginations. Neither you, nor clericals will not breed. I simply read YOUR imaginations and I try to present process and yours in it a place. What do I do not so?

95

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Vedmed, you wrote: v6>> Where statistics by an amount of children superrich? One case is not statistics. You now will recall Abramovich, and so two cases - too yet statistics. 100 suffices? http://www.forbes.ru/ekonomika/lyudi/48 … illiardery So it is much better. Though mean value in 2.4 not especially impresses nevertheless.

96

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: TG>> the Problem in what? S> judging by a question to very few people it allowed even to realize a problem simply. And how it to consider? Formulate a problem. We consider.

97

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, L.Long, you wrote: v6>>>> Any pseudo-humanism. Give we produce one million person and we throw all on , perhaps one of them takes place the genius, and remaining are not necessary, let become an inveterate drunkard, idle, are imprisoned etc. not easier to take a smaller amount of children and to create for them the best conditions for development? Efficiency it will be explicit above. LL>>> minute what means "let become an inveterate drunkard" and "perhaps becomes"? You made any efforts education or the content of my children? Or someone's else? Whose children you plan to "take", where, and what it, actually, means? Generally, how you are involved in performance/default of these slogans? v6>> I against slogans of clericals "breed all at any cost, the native land in danger". All remaining - your imaginations. LL> neither you, nor clericals will not breed. I simply read YOUR imaginations and I try to present process and yours in it a place. What do I do not so? You dream, reading my reasonings on possible ways for the state. Slogans any see, the report demand. I here am powerless. If there will be matters of substance - is ready to consider, if are not present - dismiss.

98

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, v6, you wrote: v6> the Amusing statistics - superrich (Tsukerberg, for example) are often married to Asians.  - a puppy against superrich

99

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > Lomonosov month stamped Mihajlo to Moscow in bast shoes > if on 10000 units of poverty 1 genius comes across - that better  to produce this poverty of Chyo-to I do not see communication between Lomonosovym and poverty. If to speak about imperial Russia eventually she died of an intelligence deficit. Actually to same most pushes Russia this .

100

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > the modern experience shows that increase of a standard of living leads to birth rate lowering Modern experience shows, how much incorrectly it is considered so-called "standard of living". As a matter of fact "standard of living" speaks only about how much style of life is similar to Europe-USA. And in richer USA and birth rate noticeably above.