1

Topic: Sensible thought

2

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, cheerysoft.com, you wrote: CC> Here such here a variant. Wildness and obscurantism.

3

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, cheerysoft.com, you wrote: CC> Here such here a variant. And what, in Russia early spoilage are forbidden?

4

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> And what, in Russia early spoilage are forbidden? In Russia for the present the secular state without a domestic tyranny and Sheriyat, with a priority of personal values over values of herd (a sort,  or as they there are called). Here over this problem also are going to work (and already the given creatures work).

5

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, SomeOne_TT, you wrote: CC>> Here such here a variant. SO _> wildness and obscurantism. Why??

6

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> In Russia for the present the secular state without a domestic tyranny and Sheriyat, with a priority of personal values over values of herd (a sort,  or as they there are called). You here can  bosh only thanking  to generations which lived not for itself, and for descendants

7

Re: Sensible thought

8

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, sharpman, you wrote: S> You here can  bosh only thanking  to generations which lived not for itself, and for descendants Certainly. But it does not mean that it is necessary to produce as much as possible the illiterate cattle capable only on trust and patriotism. The child-bearing while is and remains a unique method of maintenance of a civilization, but I very much hope that thanks to scientific progress (so to higher education, including female!) to it "to the status " remains not for long.

9

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> the Child-bearing while is and remains a unique method of maintenance of a civilization, but I very much hope that thanks to scientific progress (so to higher education, including female!) to it "to the status " remains not for long. Well, if the mankind dies out, the status  on it and comes to an end.

10

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: A>> the Child-bearing while is and remains a unique method of maintenance of a civilization, but I very much hope that thanks to scientific progress (so to higher education, including female!) to it "to the status " remains not for long. Pzz> well if the mankind dies out, the status  on it and comes to an end. From what suddenly dies out, if except a child-bearing there will be new methods - for example life prolongation, or cloning or still something?

11

Re: Sensible thought

S> You here can  bosh only thanking  to generations which lived not for itself, and for descendants And how they could live __ for themselves, and at all for descendants? ?

12

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A>>> the Child-bearing while is and remains a unique method of maintenance of a civilization, but I very much hope that thanks to scientific progress (so to higher education, including female!) To it "to the status " remains not for long. Pzz>> well if the mankind dies out, the status  on it and comes to an end. A> from what suddenly dies out, if except a child-bearing there will be new methods - for example life prolongation, or cloning or still something? I told slightly other thought. Namely that scientific progress has different methods of execution of your hopes of disposal of mankind of burden of a child-bearing. Vymarivanie mankind - one of them. When you formulate desires, it is necessary to be very exact That before implementation of the automated sorts, I suppose, the essence of the person is spiritually-physical, and is not reduced to set of information processes in its neural network. Therefore I strongly doubt that the mankind will be relieved of burden of a child-bearing. Though it is unconditional, the tendency to that this process flowed as much as possible without serious consequences and safely, will be saved.

13

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> I told slightly other thought. Namely that scientific progress has different methods of execution of your hopes of disposal of mankind of burden of a child-bearing. Vymarivanie mankind - one of them. When you formulate desires, it is necessary to be very exact I expressed quite precisely. Give I will quote myself: the Child-bearing while is and remains a unique method of maintenance of a civilization, but I very much hope that thanks to scientific progress (so to higher education, including female!) To it "to the status " remains not for long. While remains a unique method. With development of a science the status  will be broken - means becomes not the only thing. At what here I at all did not understand extinction, it all the same what to tell that with the advent of cars people forget to walk, and with the advent of computers - to consider. Pzz> that before implementation of the automated sorts, I suppose, the essence of the person is spiritually-physical, and is not reduced to set of information processes in its neural network. Therefore I strongly doubt that the mankind will be relieved of burden of a child-bearing. Though it is unconditional, the tendency to that this process flowed as much as possible without serious consequences and safely, will be saved." Burden "the child-bearing (and even in a greater degree ) in some measure is now because it is uncontested. As soon as there will be alternatives - the situation will be refined, because for example technologies of a rejuvenation allow to enter the positive back coupling on quality of reason of the person, and not just on its genes (i.e. actually to quality of the person as animal). Clever - you earn more - there is money for rejuvenation procedures - live longer - become even cleverer. At what here spiritually-physical essence I did not understand.

14

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, 3V, you wrote: 3V> the Second time it is especially cynical. 3V> however all under the law after all. Instead of it is necessary to pray on laws. It is this only the concepts entered into a paper turn by people with doubtful moral orientation.

15

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> At what here spiritually-physical essence I did not understand. Excuse, I cannot explain. You will not understand.

16

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> I told slightly other thought. Namely that scientific progress has different methods of execution of your hopes of disposal of mankind of burden of a child-bearing. Vymarivanie mankind - one of them. When you formulate desires, it is necessary to be very exact Once the client wanted to become above growth. I satisfied its request - extended a skeleton, but a muscle did not begin to increase (From life of genies)

17

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> Excuse, I cannot explain. You will not understand. The believer? Then yes, it is not necessary is better

18

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: Pzz>> Excuse, I cannot explain. You will not understand. A> the believer? Then yes, It is better is not necessary you the believer. Believing in the ignorance.

19

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: Pzz>> I told slightly other thought. Namely that scientific progress has different methods of execution of your hopes of disposal of mankind of burden of a child-bearing. Vymarivanie mankind - one of them. When you formulate desires, it is necessary to be very exact M> M> Once the client wanted to become above growth. I satisfied its request - extended a skeleton, but a muscle did not begin to increase M> (From life of genies) Yes-yes. I also meant it.

20

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, , you wrote: > On the one hand propagation howls that in the country a little > With another cannot disperse people neither an unprofitable autobasin, nor unprofitable  as the Paradox I not so is no place put people > I can to understand that this priest wants to tell. In Russia quite legally it is possible to marry and give birth to the child in 17 years. I.e., anything new it is not necessary to do, all already is. Only here it is not enough interested persons.

21

Re: Sensible thought

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn4htQqYDfQ

22

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: A>> the Believer? Then yes, Pzz> It is better is not necessary you the believer. Believing in the ignorance. I also do not claim for knowledge of Absolute True But both I do not talk in riddles, and I try to argue for any expression.

23

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: M>> M>> Once the client wanted to become above growth. I satisfied its request - extended a skeleton, but a muscle did not begin to increase M>> (From life of genies) Pzz> Yes-yes. I also meant it. So in that and difference of scientific progress from genies that scientific progress is created by ourselves. And permanently we have back coupling with everything that we do.

24

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> Why?? Because a problem as a whole does not solve, and as a whole attempt to solve a problem by means of a cargo-cult is already  in heads.

25

Re: Sensible thought

Hello, 3V, you wrote: 3V> Tashchemta I agree. With nonsense? To produce poverty is a last resort. 3V> and that such stories here turn out: https://pikabu.ru/story/dyira_pandoryi_4236077 How deprived? In article it is said nothing that planted them because of its age.