26

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> the Parliament of Crimea captured by terrorists not in Sevastopol was, and in Simferopol. I think, you on  to square before parliament too with pleasure , as in Lugansk, only . There to Sevastopol of 50 km, it is assured, Simferopol has been covered quite and then

27

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ>... Then answer why these morons-governors did not enter an army into Donbass? There was no request from the lawful president of Ukraine. Here in Syria, president Asad asked and entered.

28

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

M> I Think, you on  to square before parliament too with pleasure , as in Lugansk, only . There to Sevastopol of 50 km, it is assured, Simferopol has been covered quite and then Sevastopol far enough from Simferopol, the order 100.

29

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> the Parliament of Crimea captured by terrorists not in Sevastopol was, and in Simferopol. Terrorists the Supreme Rada has been captured and passed criminal laws under barrels of automatic machines in February of 2014. These morons even on the TV set it guessed to show. Whether have been assured of the impunity, whether absolutely stupid. And is faster, both that, and another.

30

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> If wanted to get that would get at once, instead of waited what that there for "referenda". If Zhuchki did not have fleas, it would be the grand daughter. War was necessary to nobody, except you and your masters.

31

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, rg45, you wrote: R> And I here suppose that a determinative was nevertheless that in Crimea the Russian army was actually. Also it is presented not only identity cards , transferred to the reserve. It, of course, yes. But here it is important also the fact that the Ukrainian army there was not.

32

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: M>> I Think, you on  to square before parliament too with pleasure , as in Lugansk, only . There to Sevastopol of 50 km, it is assured, Simferopol has been covered quite and then T> Sevastopol far enough from Simferopol, the order 100. I certainly understand that  you , but in Google cards too have a ruler for measurement of distances. Even if terrestrial air defense of Sevastopol does not reach, to an interceptor 55 from Sevasa to fly by faster, than to 120 attack plane from Perekopa. And note it much earlier

33

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> It, of course, yes. But here it is important also the fact that the Ukrainian army there was not. Well it is a philosophical question. Nominally was, but as soon as all began, clarified that it not such and Ukrainian

34

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

T>> If wanted to get that would get at once, instead of waited what that there for "referenda". R> If Zhuchki did not have fleas, it would be the grand daughter. War was necessary to nobody, except you and your masters. If there was a task to decouple serious  that Crimea for this purpose is better approached.

35

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ> Yes that here to think and solve? Because in Crimea there were many Russian armies, and into Donbass they were not entered. Anybody both did not hide it. Here also I ask, if you put so a question then answer why these morons-governors did not enter an army into Donbass? Yes you directly the agent of the Kremlin any

36

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> If there was a task to decouple serious  that Crimea for this purpose is better approached. Crimea, owing to the geographical position, is a key position for  all water area of the black sea. Nobody was going to arrange there any . But Americans, I think, and could not imagine such turn of events.

37

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Berserk, you wrote: Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T>> Why "independence" of Crimea did not arrange Putin? You to us tell, what for Ukraine annexed Crimea after Union disorder? Is better let tells, what for Ukraine annexed a part of Russia, Poland, Romania and Hungary and to it anything for it was not.

38

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

R> Crimea, owing to the geographical position, is a key position for  all water area of the black sea. Well how many it is possible, even in WWII the black sea solved nothing. And now so generally a raked pool from different directions. R> nobody was going to arrange there any . But Americans, I think, and could not imagine such turn of events. That could not present? That Putin so sits stupidly down on the sanction. P.S. If Putin plays in independence of Crimea sanctions to it would not hang - but Crimea actually would be it.

39

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Well how many it is possible, even in WWII the black sea solved nothing. And now so generally a raked pool from different directions. T> that could not present? That Putin so sits stupidly down on the sanction. T> P.S. If Putin plays in independence of Crimea sanctions to it would not hang - but Crimea actually would be it. I think, your estimations are erratic, in the majority. Ukraine, losing Crimea, lost interest of the West. And Putin very much even not bad played this deal. Well it by my amateurish estimations.

40

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

R> I think, your estimations are erratic, in the majority. Ukraine, losing Crimea, lost interest of the West. And Putin very much even not bad played this deal. Well it by my amateurish estimations. At the NATO West in Turkey + control over the channel, what for it still Crimea? It is ridiculous.

41

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Sevastopol far enough from Simferopol, the order 100. It somehow hinders to put terrorist aviashock on the peace population?

42

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> It, of course, yes. But here it is important also the fact that the Ukrainian army there was not. There was there an Ukrainian army, certainly they hastened  the Russian Federation.

43

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> P.S. If Putin plays in independence of Crimea sanctions to it would not hang - but Crimea actually would be it. Lies. Russia under sanctions walks and will walk, the West will invent only different occasions. There would be no Ukraine - would enter sanctions for infringement of gays or for cheap energy for .

44

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: the GARDEN> presence in  heaps of the Russian military men? How they prevent to bomb suburbs of Sevastopol?

45

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ> Yes that here to think and solve? Because in Crimea there were many Russian armies, and into Donbass they were not entered. Anybody both did not hide it. Here also I ask, if you put so a question then answer why these morons-governors did not enter an army into Donbass? Can because in Donbase there was no Black Sea fleet?

46

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

M> That happens to the independent countries - can study on an example of blockade of the North Korea. Now who that locks Abkhazia?

47

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: the Subject incorrect. What else annexation???

48

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

T>> That hindered to start to be at war in Crimea to "referendum"? R> So this question to you repeatedly set - why Ukraine on Donbass started to be at war, and in Crimea is not present. But for four years you and could not answer it. I feel, what it is very correct question, but fairly I admit, is not assured, whether that I know precisely the right answer for  chew for me?

49

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, SaprXM, you wrote: SXM> I feel, what it is very correct question, but fairly I admit, is not assured, whether that I know precisely right answer SXM> for  chew for me? What do you want, that I to you chewed? I too want to receive the answer to this question.

50

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Why "independence" of Crimea did not arrange Putin? Because sold Crimea for access to the power. And if bought what for to throw out?