51

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, rg45, you wrote: GZ>> Yes that here to think and solve? Because in Crimea there were many Russian armies, and into Donbass they were not entered. Anybody both did not hide it. Here also I ask, if you put so a question then answer why these morons-governors did not enter an army into Donbass? R> yes you directly the agent of the Kremlin any From what. Putin merged.

52

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: GZ>> Yes that here to think and solve? Because in Crimea there were many Russian armies, and into Donbass they were not entered. Anybody both did not hide it. Here also I ask, if you put so a question then answer why these morons-governors did not enter an army into Donbass? Pzz> can because in Donbase there was no Black Sea fleet? Did not understand. Type  to Crimea carried on the big naval barge, and to drag it in steppes  not ?

53

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: Pzz>> Can because in Donbase there was no Black Sea fleet? GZ> did not understand. Type  to Crimea carried on the big naval barge, and to drag it in steppes  not ? Type, Russia Crimea as basis of the Black Sea fleet, and on Donbas it, by and large, to spit is strategically important.

54

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

There Black sea, and it as writes Shmj, death and corrosion the Author: Shmj Date: 17.01 08:47!

55

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, rg45, you wrote: Pzz>> And how it there you will set, to Crimea if Crimea is connected to continent  an isthmus to block which it costs nothing? R> well across Lugansk aviashock put? What prevented to do the same in Sevastopol? Air defense

56

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> Well I suppose, the Black Sea fleet is capable to protect itself from weak aviashock. From not weak too.

57

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, bingoboy, you wrote: T>> Sevastopol far enough from Simferopol, the order 100. B> It somehow hinders to put terrorist aviashock on the peace population? Well unless the pilot will be the kamikaze and that not the fact that reaches.

58

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: R>> Well across Lugansk aviashock put? What prevented to do the same in Sevastopol? V> air defense And so, all answers to a question are reduced to one: "because in Crimea the Russian armies were actually".

59

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: M>> it is simple for both questions the people voted pro as understood, probably that at them it does not turn out any independence, Ukraine gets with retaliatory operation. Here also connected. And and here Putin, I T> If wanted to get that would get at once, instead of waited what that there for "referenda". And got on 11th of March. But near an isthmus it was tore "on doctrines".

60

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: M>> Well, for retaliatory operation the occasion all the same is necessary. And such occasion (with 100% probability) would be proclamation of independence T by Crimea> the Occasion was, capture of parliament of Crimea. Building capture is when do not start up there owners. And in Simferopol happens exactly on the contrary, polite people provided uninterrupted operation of operation of parliament.

61

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> That hindered to start to be at war in Crimea to "referendum"? Picked up a right moment - Ukraine was not ready (roughly speaking ).

62

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> If wanted to get that would get at once, instead of waited what that there for "referenda". You a film "Crimea. Whether a way home" that looked? There there is an answer to your question - tried to a referendum. Could not.

63

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz>>> Can because in Donbase there was no Black Sea fleet? GZ>> did not understand. Type  to Crimea carried on the big naval barge, and to drag it in steppes  not ? Pzz> Type, Russia Crimea as basis of the Black Sea fleet, and on Donbas it, by and large, to spit is strategically important. And it is strategically necessary for Ukraine . Also what?

64

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, rg45, you wrote: R> So this question to you repeatedly set - why Ukraine on Donbass started to be at war, and in Crimea is not present. But for four years you and could not answer it.  because. Crimea handed over, and anger of radicals translated to east areas. Donbass served as a change, has been sacrificed for Crimea. By the way, till now there is a probability of war in Crimea.

65

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, rg45, you wrote: R> So this question to you repeatedly set - why Ukraine on Donbass started to be at war, and in Crimea is not present. But for four years you and could not answer it. Because there is no Ukrainian power any, there is a group captured control levers which defends the interests ( not only enrichment), instead of interests of the Ukrainian people (stands up for its liquidation more likely).

66

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Pzz, you wrote: Pzz> And how it there you will set, to Crimea if Crimea is connected to continent  an isthmus to block which it costs nothing? Narrow is 90 km (on foot 2 days to go, if on a straight line). The part is impassable, but all the same not such and narrow. Here also there would be a fight for an isthmus.

67

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, rg45, you wrote: R> Well across Lugansk aviashock put? What prevented to do the same in Sevastopol? To Lugansk, by the way, struck shock of Poroshenko. To it nobody dared at scheduled mass bloodshed (Odessa more likely accident, it has not been planned).

68

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

T> Why "independence" of Crimea did not arrange Putin? A question ambiguous. Some (in the core oppositional) politicians, consider that Putin wanted to get involved in an unpleasant incident as the returned Crimea. I consider that the circuit when Crimea remains independent the western community would be swallowed much more easy and would not be considerable parts of problems and sanctions. And years through 15-20 it would be possible to hold a repeated referendum and already to connect with the Russian Federation. But decided to accept according to desire of people. And it is good.

69

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

70

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> now who that locks Abkhazia? In a much bigger level, than Crimea.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

71

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: GZ> did not understand. Type  to Crimea carried on the big naval barge, and to drag it in steppes  not ? "" unless not a fleet part?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

72

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Crimea handed over, and anger of radicals translated to east areas. Donbass served as a change, has been sacrificed for Crimea. S> by the way, till now there is a probability of war in Crimea. Because your morons elementarily  to go to Crimea. There they easily could receive on a face. Quickly, painfully and for ever. And Donbass - in the same place simple miners, people normal which and are not able to be at war. So they thought. Received on snivels - started to cry out about the Russian aggression... Simply Laurels.  any... Z.Y.suffic to be dishonored already.

73

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: Pzz>> And how it there you will set, to Crimea if Crimea is connected to continent  an isthmus to block which it costs nothing? S> narrow is 90 km (on foot 2 days to go, if on a straight line). The part is impassable, but all the same not such and narrow. S> here also there would be a fight for an isthmus. To throw armies, the road is necessary. There it how much I remember, one. Enough one fighting embarkation, also will be it is any.

74

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: Pzz>> Type, Russia Crimea as basis of the Black Sea fleet, and on Donbas it, by and large, to spit is strategically important. GZ> and Ukraine it is strategically necessary . Also what? Control over Crimea is necessary to Russia, and there she is ready to be at war. And on Donbase Russia infinite quite arranges Ukrainian , and on Donbase Russia will not be at war seriously. With maintenance  in the undamped state quite local gangsters consult, if to them slightly to help.

75

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Berserk, you wrote: T>> Why "independence" of Crimea did not arrange Putin? You to us tell, what for Ukraine annexed Crimea after Union disorder? Generally that they annexed Crimea in Soviet Union. Pushed in Secretaries general of the Ukrainian.