101

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: And whether there was an annexation of Crimea?

102

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, Lazy Bear, you wrote: LB> Well, this point of view to me is clear. However, we also have following statements: LB> LB> http://rsdn.org/forum/flame.politics/7023786.1 the Author: GlebZ Date: 18.01 15:11 GZ>>> do not forget, the Russian armies of involvement there did not accept. LB> LB>> http://rsdn.org/forum/flame.politics/7022991.1 the author: GlebZ Date: 17.01 21:30 GZ>>> in Crimea was many the Russian armies, and into Donbass they were not entered. Anybody also did not hide it. LB> that is, the Russian armies  there were not? A misprint against grew dark + consequences of games of language on Vitgenstein.

103

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> Why "independence" of Crimea did not arrange Putin? Foolishly. Did not estimate consequences. And to object who from a surrounding did not dare.

104

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: A>> the Good question. M> that happens to the independent countries - can study on an example of blockade of the North Korea. There there is no blockade

105

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: S> foolishly. Did not estimate consequences. And to object who from a surrounding did not dare. Precisely. And all why? That is why that all clever people work as taxi drivers and . The country , children learn, people are treated by one fools.

106

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: M>> That happens to the independent countries - can study on an example of blockade of the North Korea. S> there there is no blockade About as. That is you do not know that  in Northern Korea is organized by sanctions on delivery of mineral fertilizers and the equipment for its manufacture, and raw materials stores in  are not present. Where stick, everywhere you try to rehabilitate Americans and to blacken Russia.

107

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, GlebZ, you wrote: LB>> That is, the Russian armies  there were not? GZ> a misprint against grew dark + consequences of games of language on Vitgenstein. Well and misprints at you, the barin - the whole sentences of misprints already on some posts - go, understand, wanted what to tell! All to you in spillikins language to play...

108

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, alsemm, you wrote: S>> foolishly. Did not estimate consequences. And to object who from a surrounding did not dare. A> it is exact. And all why? That is why that all clever people work as taxi drivers and . The country , children learn, people are treated by one fools. You remember, what is the time lived the USSR?

109

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M>>> That happens to the independent countries - can study on an example of blockade of the North Korea. S>> there there is no blockade M> About as. That is you do not know that  in Northern Korea is organized by sanctions on delivery of mineral fertilizers and the equipment for its manufacture, and raw materials stores in  are not present. In the dictionary glance! Blockade is an overlapping of transport ways, instead of sanctions. And sanctions, you just told, Moscow entered, times of fertilizer did not deliver, instead of America.

110

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: S> you Remember, what is the time lived the USSR? Russia once again replaced a title.

111

Re: What for annexation of Crimea was necessary?

Hello, alsemm, you wrote: S>> you Remember, what is the time lived the USSR? A> Russia once again replaced a title. More truly, once again lost territories. It from Alaska digitizing