1

Topic: Future SecurityManager

Greetings the Command jdk interview on that as are used SecurityManager: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/ … 00649.html Judging by that that a bit before it suggested to delete, this inquiry - chance to leave SecurityManager for those who uses it (all or its part).

2

Re: Future SecurityManager

Hello, serb, you wrote: S> Judging by that that a bit before it suggested to delete, S> this inquiry - chance to leave SecurityManager for those who uses it (all or its part). And to whom it is necessary now?

3

Re: Future SecurityManager

Directly to anybody, but a sandbox as without it to do? However, with development of the Docker of a sandbox on other level left/leave/leave.

4

Re: Future SecurityManager

Hello, bzig, you wrote: B> Directly to anybody, but a sandbox as without it to do? And to whom the sandbox is necessary? I in a reality did not face while with such (well except  in  applets).

5

Re: Future SecurityManager

Hello, bzig, you wrote: B> Directly to anybody, but a sandbox as without it to do? However, with development of the Docker of a sandbox on other level left/leave/leave. And to the docker did not see that used, did on the user on application.

6

Re: Future SecurityManager

vsb> And to whom the sandbox is necessary? I in a reality did not face while with such (well except  in  applets). JNLP still - cool technology, it is a pity did not fly up. Besides on shared-hostings it was possibly used.

7

Re: Future SecurityManager

Hello, GarryIV, you wrote: GIV> And to whom it is necessary now? It is occasion to come on voting and to tell that it is not necessary. As one of variants of inquiry - usage for preventive access restriction to file system, a network, to devices and .