1

Topic: About temporary daltonism

2

Re: About temporary daltonism

S> Image: Color_blindness_rus.JPG S> At any disorder of the people does not see dark blue as pink. How to explain? So these disorders in a label are caused by defects of a retina. And more less known defects. And brain glitches that you want can draw. Enough  pictures on demand ' perception under lsd '. By the way, can then  in pool dissolved a tablet

3

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, ononim, you wrote: O> So these disorders in a label are caused by defects of a retina. And more less known defects. And brain glitches that you want can draw. Enough  pictures on demand ' perception under lsd '. By the way, can then  in pool dissolved a tablet Yes,  and a glitch. On  it is not similar at all - simply dark blue became pink. Yet did not see a label with daltonism, considered that simply one B-type of cones fell off. On the contrary, it is not taught - then green color would be. Here and there is a question about . What does color mean? That that another sees dark blue - you see AS red. Or generally color at all the, i.e. even is not present analogies. Here it also is called .

4

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Here and there is a question about . What does color mean? That that another sees dark blue - you see AS red. Or generally color at all the, i.e. even is not present analogies. S> Here it also is called . At me the right and left eye sees shades of colors slightly differently. As though a bit different color temperatures. It does not hinder, even is imperceptibly simple so, a difference completely not big, but that, not less if to look that one some difference in perception is other eye. And generally there are people at which because of genetic anomaly there are cones with 4-mja, instead of 3-mja basic colors. Two red, green and dark blue. Here they see the world absolutely differently. And it is proved, the woman under the link accurately distinguished cards with different for it, but identical for remaining colors. There are examples of the pictures, allowing to present as it sees https://geektimes.ru/post/273412/

5

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Michael7, you wrote: M> And generally there are people at which because of genetic anomaly there are cones with 4-mja, instead of 3-mja basic colors. Two red, green and dark blue. "Two red" is a nonsense. To tell more correctly: at them 2  for frequencies of 476-394 terahertz. And at us only 1  for this range of frequencies. So? Here to you and the scientific proof . And how differently to tell? M> there are examples of the pictures, allowing to present as it sees https://geektimes.ru/post/273412/Well, to present we cannot in any way. We see as red, and she sees in the image inaccessible to our understanding. All the same that to the color-blind person to present that color which he does not see.

6

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> At any disorder of the people does not see dark blue as pink. How to explain? But as violet sees, lamps such were earlier, them certainly used for street lighting but as the version, I consider, descends.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

7

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> "Two red" is a nonsense. To tell more correctly: at them 2  for frequencies of 476-394 terahertz. And at us only 1  for this range of frequencies. So? Whether that learned a fashionable word? Hasten to show its knowledge does not cause somewhat quicker while its usage still universal "faugh a shit, throw out it". And precisely yet does not cause?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

8

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> "Two red" is a nonsense. To tell more correctly: at them 2  for frequencies of 476-394 terahertz. And at us only 1  for this range of frequencies. So? S> Here to you and the scientific proof . And how differently to tell? Actually, exactly on the contrary. This scientific proof that  - the idiotic invention .... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

9

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Michael7, you wrote: M> At me the right and left eye sees shades of colors slightly differently. As though a bit different color temperatures. It does not hinder, even is imperceptibly simple so, a difference completely not big, but that, not less if to look that one some difference in perception is other eye. , at me the same hogwash. One eye sees in slightly yellow gamma, another in slightly blue. Did not note still any anomalies in sight?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

10

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> At any disorder of the people does not see dark blue as pink. How to explain? A light source spectrum. Heard about balance of the white?

11

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> But as violet sees, lamps such were earlier, them certainly used for street lighting but as the version, I consider, descends. Nonsense. Every day there walked and only once there was such case. The towel turned blue gradually when fresh air arrived in lungs.

12

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, pagid, you wrote: whether P> that learned the Fashionable word? Hasten to show its knowledge does not cause somewhat quicker while its usage still universal "faugh a shit, throw out it". And precisely yet does not cause? To this term I came independently. Was surprised that it is in the dictionary.

13

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, CoderMonkey, you wrote: CM> Actually, exactly on the contrary. This scientific proof that  - the idiotic invention . And you tell that this woman, without term engaging "" saw.

14

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, solarwind, you wrote: S> a light source Spectrum. Heard about balance of the white? No, walked there every day and the case was only once. Light there from the big windows was, at night there did not happen.

15

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> And you tell that this woman, without term engaging "" saw. Could distinguish more than the average person of shades . What for here it is necessary any ...... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

16

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> Could distinguish more than the average person of shades . What for here it is necessary any ... Shades can be distinguished without 4 types of cones. Simply to have more sensitive cones of R-type. For you there is a difference between a shade and basic color? Shades millions and basic colors only 3. And she saw absolutely other basic color as  which is not similar on our red either green or dark blue. It absolutely another.

17

Re: About temporary daltonism

S> I Quote the case: at me such case regularly. When I transit in a sunny day through the minimarket covered with green polycarbonate. When I quit (it of meters hundred long) colors are distorted extremely. Through pair minutes all is recovered. S> at any disorder of the people does not see dark blue as pink. How to explain? To explain simply. Sight at the person is arranged through a bum. And not only at the person.

18

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Shades can be distinguished without 4 types of cones. Simply to have more sensitive cones of R-type. And how prospective presence of one more type of cones gives of us to inevitability of usage of a word "", same the term not from physiology, and from some  S> For you there is a difference between a shade and basic color? Shades millions and basic colors only 3. No. I/mine "" is not capable to distinguish it S> And she saw absolutely other basic color as  which is not similar on our red either green or dark blue. It absolutely another. Whence you know? And on the basis of what you consider basic red, green and dark blue? In the book so it is written?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

19

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> at me such case regularly. When I transit in a sunny day through the minimarket covered with green polycarbonate. K> when I quit (it of meters hundred long) colors are distorted extremely. Through pair minutes all is recovered. Colors are distorted, but dark blue the maximum in violet can turn, but not in is light the pink. Pictures see. I walked every day in pool, every day same. Neither to nor after anything similar was not. S>> at any disorder of the people does not see dark blue as pink. How to explain? K> to explain simply. Sight at the person is arranged through a bum. And not only at the person. For many years never a similar case at me was, so it is normally arranged.

20

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> At any disorder of the people does not see dark blue as pink. How to explain? A phenomenon of a dark blue or white dress

21

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, pagid, you wrote: S>> Shades can be distinguished without 4 types of cones. Simply to have more sensitive cones of R-type. P> and how prospective presence of one more type of cones gives of us to inevitability of usage of a word "", same the term not from physiology, and from some  Here and results - differently you will not tell. S>> for you there is a difference between a shade and basic color? Shades millions and basic colors only 3. P> Is not present. I/mine "" is not capable to distinguish it you understand that in the monitor 3 types of LEDs. And at them fixed frequency, a difference only in intensity of a glow. 3 frequencies and different intensity. If to leave 2 types of LEDs - that any intensity of a glow does not replace frequency of the third. And for this woman the normal monitor cannot render that color 4 which she sees (and which we do not distinguish from red). S>> And she saw absolutely other basic color as  which is not similar on our red either green or dark blue. It absolutely another. P> whence you know? And on the basis of what you consider basic red, green and dark blue? In the book so it is written? On the basis of that that in the monitor these 3 colors (can look a magnifier) and their combination is capable to transfer any shade. Photograph and look on the monitor - colors are transferred. And if you have 4 type of cones - that in the monitor any more  to transfer all colors - well in any way.

22

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, antropolog, you wrote: A> the Phenomenon of a dark blue or white dress Is not present, look at my pictures. It not that that the shade became another. Or lighting artificial was color. Instead of dark blue was brightly pink.

23

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Is not present, look at my pictures. It not that that the shade became another. Or lighting artificial was color. Instead of dark blue was brightly pink. What does "shade" mean? On a dress dark blue became white, black became golden. In what place it is "shades"?

24

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, CoderMonkey, you wrote: CM> Zanjatno, at me the same hogwash. One eye sees in slightly yellow gamma, another in slightly blue. CM> did not note still any anomalies in sight? Short of that sight is far for a long time already not unit and there is a small astigmatism like is not present.

25

Re: About temporary daltonism

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Here and results - differently you will not tell. S> you understand that in the monitor 3 types of LEDs. And at them fixed frequency, a difference only in intensity of a glow. 3 frequencies and different intensity. I know about it. S> if to leave 2 types of LEDs - that any intensity of a glow does not replace frequency of the third. Yes. S> And for this woman the normal monitor cannot render that color 4 which she sees (and which we do not distinguish from red). Yes from what it? Or that color quits for visible others a range? If it not so, that is we distinguish shades which the monitor cannot play back, she distinguishes such shades more. But it only if to check that it really had one more type of color receptors. S> on the basis of that that in the monitor these 3 colors (can look a magnifier) and their combination is capable to transfer any shade. Not any. Theoretically not any, and practically too. But it depends on singularities of color perception of specific people, someone distinguishes more shades, someone is less, it is not connected to an amount of cones. S> and if you have 4 type of cones - that in the monitor any more  to transfer all colors - well in any way. If the fourth type is not beyond visible the majority of a section of a spectrum, not color, and shades. Only we passed to physics and physiology, "" here at all at affairs.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>