1

Topic: Format of the monitor for operation

All kind Share, who what format of the monitor uses for operation (programming) and whether it is convenient to you. Here I understand as a format the size, resolution and a ratio of the sides. Why I ask - there was a question of a choice of the monitor. Now I have FHD 24 inches (19201080). Basically, it would be desirable height more that  it is less, and the width suffices, even it is a lot of. Scaling in Windows is installed on 125 % - I love the large text. I consider variants of 24-17 inches, from 19201080 to 2560x1440 (more built in video normally does not pull, on  to be spent desires is not present). As a matter of fact my choice was reduced to variants: 1) 24 "19201200 (16:10) - more convenient ratio of the sides in my opinion, but the prices inadequate, a choice is insignificant 2) 25" 2560x1440 (16:9) - a choice even less, high value DPI, the prices are comparable to the previous variant - know though for what pay 3) 27 "19201080 (16:9) - a wide choice, cheap but good, 27 inches - not ? 4) 27 "2560x1440 (16:9) - the most expensive category, the big area, good DPI Still I will in passing ask about types of matrixes. TN I think we do not consider, remains *PS or *VA, what your judgements that is better?

2

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> 4) 27 "2560x1440 (16:9) - the most expensive category, the big area, good DPI Or 27" 19201200 (but something them ceased to let out). A matrix of high-grade 8 bits, instead of emulation 6 +frc. Plus it is necessary to pay attention to illumination - should be flicker free.

3

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> 3) 27 "19201080 (16:9) - a wide choice, cheap but good, 27 inches - not ? IMHO 27" . It is necessary to twirl by a head, the neck is tired I prefer stupidly two 24 "19201080 on 1.0 (without font magnification, the blessing sight allows)

4

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, bnk, you wrote: bnk> Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K>> 3) 27 "19201080 (16:9) - a wide choice, cheap but good, 27 inches - not ? bnk> IMHO 27" . It is necessary to twirl by a head, the neck is tired bnk> I prefer stupidly two 24 "19201080 on 1.0 (without font magnification, the blessing sight allows) On operation 28" 1920*1080 - it is not necessary to twirl by a head. Home took 32 "2560*1440 (a point as on 24" 1920*1080) -  hardly  costs, a head it is necessary to twist a little. Desktop I will replace, it will not be necessary. It  with fliker-fri and  - eyes are not tired.

5

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> 1) 24 "19201200 (16:10) - more convenient ratio of the sides in my opinion, but the prices inadequate, a choice is insignificant P_K> Still in passing I will ask about types of matrixes. TN I think we do not consider, remains *PS or *VA, what your judgements that is better? I use years 10 such. From 24 to 26 changed some monitors. The first was with worthless TN a matrix. Now with normal TN, also was with matrix MVA, that that , not especially differs. 16:10 nevertheless it is better than 16:9 though it is not basic but if there is a possibility to have more work space on a vertical why it not to use? The choice is not great, but that that is, it is enough of it. Perhaps, in due course, I will pass on  resolution but while sense I do not see. People and for 1280 * 1024 work till now, and productively work.

6

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> All kind P_K> Still I will in passing ask about types of matrixes. TN I think we do not consider, remains *PS or *VA, what your judgements that is better? To everyone the. 1920*1200 (PVA) and 1200*1600 (IPS). The second monitor portrait - is less places and sight not so what so far to look. PVA brakes in comparison with IPS, but I for a month where that got used and 60 FPS video I look without discomfort. Still PVA "blinks" if at it in active 3D points to look. IPS strangely enough does not blink

7

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

In my opinion 1920x1080 it is the standard, to recede from which - to lose a choice. Lately I work on 27 "1920x1080, me arranges. In 1920x1200, for example, I do not understand what sense. It is necessary more vertical space - make a font less, will be  more. If now bought the monitor, would take 27" 4K resolution, but they are my cockroaches, very much I love small pixels and, how on them  the text. A matrix I take only IPS, to me the main thing that colors were closer to the presents and were not distorted at big enough range of visual angles.

8

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> I Consider variants of 24-17 inches, from 19201080 to 2560x1440 (more built in video normally does not pull, on  to be spent desires is not present). To built in video . About one month   on 3 monitors: 2x FullHD and 1x 2K. P_K> As a matter of fact my choice was reduced to variants: P_K> 1) 24 "19201200 (16:10) - more convenient ratio of the sides in my opinion, but the prices inadequate, the choice Was insignificant the such. There is no particular advantage before more running 22" FullHD. Only the pixel is larger. It makes sense at a poor eyesight. But then you would not consider a variant No2. P_K> 2) 25 "2560x1440 (16:9) - a choice is even less, high value DPI, the prices are comparable to the previous variant - know though for what pay P_K> 3) 27" 19201080 (16:9) - a wide choice, cheap but good, 27 inches - not ? P_K> 4) 27 "2560x1440 (16:9) - the most expensive category, the big area, good DPI 32" 2560x1440. The reason - the closest size of grain with already available 22 "FullHD. P_K> Still I will in passing ask about types of matrixes. TN I think we do not consider, remains *PS or *VA, what your judgements that is better? Both are good. Modern TN too is quite good.  to look alive and to select on a picture.

9

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, _ilya _, you wrote: __> Or 27 "19201200 (but something them ceased to let out). To refuse. It for absolutely blind. Enormous pixel at any resolution.

10

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, VladCore, you wrote: VC> 1920*1200 (PVA) and 1200*1600 (IPS). The second monitor portrait - is less places and sight not so what so far to look. VC> PVA brakes in comparison with IPS, but I for a month where that got used and 60 FPS video I look without discomfort. VC> Still PVA "blinks" if at it in active 3D points to look. IPS strangely enough does not blink Brakes/blinkings there is a sense to check up on https://testufo.com/

11

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> 1) 24 "19201200 (16:10) - more convenient ratio of the sides in my opinion, but the prices inadequate, the choice is insignificant They expensive, because it" professional "a format. But in such type rarely happen TN+film. P_K> 3) 27" 19201080 (16:9) - a wide choice, cheap but good, 27 inches - not ? And it  a format, and it coincides with the standard for . It is difficult to find a decent matrix In such format (IPS or, at least, *PVA). But if you will find, it will be noticeable more expensively .

12

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> Share, who what format of the monitor uses for operation (programming) and whether it is convenient to you. P_K> here I understand as a format the size, resolution and a ratio of the sides. 27 ", 3840x2160, probably, it 16:9. The first monitor with which I would not like any more the additional monitor,  the monitor (above write that a head it is necessary to twist - 27" exactly on the verge it is not necessary when still to twist). P_K> Why I ask - there was a question of a choice of the monitor. P_K> now I have FHD 24 inches (19201080). Basically, it would be desirable height more that  it is less, and the width suffices, even it is a lot of. Scaling in Windows is installed on 125 % - I love the large text. P_K> I consider variants of 24-17 inches, from 19201080 to 2560x1440 (more built in video normally does not pull, on  to be spent desires is not present). Even old  Thinkpad X220 pulls 3840x2160 on 30Hz, or even . If  are not necessary, all remaining works, with  unless an ambush that any uplavniteli-doublers of frequency of frames are useless on 30Hz, but as a whole is decent. To us for operation the monitor, truly? But  fonts and when suddenly it is necessary to allocate a lot of text on the screen - small  helps. P_K> as a matter of fact my choice was reduced to variants: P_K> 1) 24 "19201200 (16:10) - more convenient ratio of the sides in my opinion, but the prices inadequate, a choice is insignificant P_K> 2) 25" 2560x1440 (16:9) - a choice even less, high value DPI, the prices are comparable to the previous variant - know though for what pay P_K> 3) 27 "19201080 (16:9) - a wide choice, cheap but good, 27 inches - not ? P_K> 4) 27" 2560x1440 (16:9) - the most expensive category, the big area, good DPI And I was surprised who this stuff buy till now all at such prices on 4K P_K> Still in passing I will ask about types of matrixes. TN I think we do not consider, remains *PS or *VA, what your judgements that is better? On responses even TN anything, which 4K. At me IPS only because it was cheaper than other accessible variants, the order 400USD.

13

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> In my opinion 1920x1080 it is the standard, to recede from which - to lose a choice. Lately I work on 27 "1920x1080, me arranges. In 1920x1200, for example, I do not understand what sense. It is necessary more vertical space - make a font less, will be  more. In what choice deprivation consists? Quite enough 1920x1200 monitors, both inexpensive, and professional, everyones NEC. The sense 1200 on a vertical in that that is more than place on a vertical on 120 points, it not too is not enough. It is quite good enough For programming, when there is more than code , or as much, but at you still from below diagnostic  normally is located. Besides, this 16:9 - for cinema. Not casually professional ratio is closer to the square.

14

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Very convenient it appeared 34 ", 34401440 ( slightly). Upon as 224", only without any frames, and on height resolution that is necessary. So there were conveniently, as houses such (ASUS ROG - at the same time and it is possible to play), and on operation (but there already only Dell, after to 30 "normal 2 to the monitor sideways). A matrix - IPS, *VA, if only not TN (them that, still let out except as for gamers?). On the monitor it is impossible to save. It, as well as the keypad, the most important for .

15

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> Still I will in passing ask about types of matrixes. TN I think we do not consider, remains *PS or *VA, what your judgements that is better? If for operations (programming) - only *VA. Above visibility - is less brightness - less eyes are tired. Search for something more 3000:1.

16

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: V> In what choice deprivation consists? Quite enough 1920x1200 monitors, both inexpensive, and professional, everyones NEC. Well here I look local shop: 1920 x 1080 Full HD 173 models, 1920 x 1200 WUXGA 5 models. V> sense 1200 on a vertical in that that is more than place on a vertical on 120 points, it not too is not enough. It is quite good enough For programming, when there is more than code , or as much, but at you still from below diagnostic  normally is located. You put a font approaching and is located it is so much, how many it is necessary. 27 "allows to see all without compromises. The ratio of the sides here is absolutely not critical.

17

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> Well here I look local shop: 1920 x 1080 Full HD 173 models, 1920 x 1200 WUXGA 5 models. From these 5 for certain it is possible to select a suitable variant. I selected) And is happy.

18

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, aik, you wrote: aik> Even old  Thinkpad X220 pulls 3840x2160 on 30Hz, or even . If  are not necessary, all remaining works, with  unless an ambush that any uplavniteli-doublers of frequency of frames are useless on 30Hz, but as a whole is decent. To us for operation the monitor, truly? Read about that much that at 30 FPS interface logs are noticeable, even the mouse pointer not smoothly moves. If to collect 4 a high-grade configuration, in it yet I do not see need.

19

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> read about that much that at 30 FPS interface logs are noticeable, even the mouse pointer not smoothly moves. If to collect 4 a high-grade configuration, in it yet I do not see need.  slightly, yes But, sitting in 4K, from larger  me  pulls. Only gloss on the screen is worse.

20

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Here the dude tells that on the size is better 24 inches.

21

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> I Consider variants of 24-17 inches, from 19201080 to 2560x1440 (more built in video normally does not pull, on  to be spent desires is not present). P_K> As a matter of fact my choice was reduced to variants: P_K> 1) 24 "19201200 (16:10) - more convenient ratio of the sides in my opinion, but the prices inadequate, a choice is insignificant P_K> 2) 25" 2560x1440 (16:9) - a choice even less, high value DPI, the prices are comparable to the previous variant - know though for what pay P_K> 3) 27 "19201080 (16:9) - a wide choice, cheap but good, 27 inches - not ? P_K> 4) 27" 2560x1440 (16:9) - the most expensive category, the big area, good DPI P_K> Still I will in passing ask about types of matrixes. TN I think we do not consider, remains *PS or *VA, what your judgements that is better? At the modern prices on 4K to look at these second-hand articles? What for? Against the horse prices for storage it for nothing. And here the effect on health - is enormous Bought 2x4K, 27 ", IPS. Dell P2715Q and LG 27-UD58 And all that looks simply awfully more low. , interpolation. Both perfectly work with rare Radeon HD7850 on 4K 60P through Mini-DP.  from hands such to buy, I think, dollars for 50 it is possible. In games I do not play, but, as far as I understand, FullHD for games it is possible to deliver without problems.

22

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, SkyDance, you wrote: SD> very convenient it appeared 34 ", 34401440 ( slightly). It is interesting, how sensations from ? I such somehow did not consider even (often enough meet 27" from , plus can be found a VA-matrix)

23

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Vetal_ca, you wrote: V _> At the modern prices on 4K to look at these second-hand articles? What for? Against the horse prices for storage it for nothing. And here the effect on health - is enormous V _> Bought 2x4K, 27 ", IPS. Dells P2715Q and LG 27-UD58 As, by the way,  and used tools digest such DPI? You for certain exposed in system scale of percent 150-200? There came an era of normally implemented operation at scaling? I remember with it there were problems almost at every third program, even MS  earlier. Now it seems to me already is better, but meets. Even in Win10 some windows which have got in the inheritance from former versions, are shown somehow  (MMC, for example).

24

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Thanks all answered. Which I for myself made the main output: the size 27 "is not much, the majority arranges, some use 32-34. With a size were defined. A ratio of the sides except as 16:9 did not meet. Now a question with resolution. FullHD - it is inexpensive, it is possible to find on a VA-matrix, it will not be necessary to include the scaling, the most simple decision in system, it is unmodern 2K - will be on IPS, for the text of the customary size it is necessary to put scale of 125 %-150 % 4 - will work on 30FPS (it is necessary  with ), it is possible to find on interesting (concerning the previous variant) to the prices Should be walked around shops to look in live large pixels are how much awful. In passing there was a question concerning the bent screen. Who works behind the such? How to you?

25

Re: Format of the monitor for operation

Hello, Poul_Ko, you wrote: P_K> As, by the way,  and used tools digest such DPI? You for certain exposed in system scale of percent 150-200? P_K> there Came an era of normally implemented operation at scaling? P_K> I remember with it there were problems almost at every third program, even MS  earlier. Now it seems to me already is better, but meets. Even in Win10 some windows which have got in the inheritance from former versions, are shown somehow  (MMC, for example). For certain more. Checked up,  a slider in the middle between Smaller and Larger in "Control Panel\Appearance and Personalization\Display" Problems any it is not visible, Windows 8.1. Was QHD the display Earlier, there there was "soap" in some dialogues at pulling between different DPI