101

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

Hello, Nik, you wrote: Pzz>> Well , generally, do not prevent. Without them the garbage  is no place. N> absolutely suddenly if garbage there is no place to throw out it simply does not need to be thrown out you Carry with yourself, yet you will not find where it is possible to throw legally. It . I have possibility simultaneously to compare three regions Russian Federations. And so revealed regularity: There, where urns stand through each 25-30 steps - purely and garbage in an urn that is called on a bottom. And there, where it is necessary to search for an urn - all is showered by bull-calves, , , stubs, candy wrappers, banks,  and to use an urn if it will be possible to find, it is impossible, as it is already filled "with a hill". At what, such places (it is a lot of urns and their deficit) can adjoin in one region, is literally in several kilometers from each other.

102

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> Still in addition I suggest to enter "a rule of three violations", as into the USA: did not remove for the creature three times - the dog is excepted and destroyed. Cool! Prufy is?

103

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

Hello, LuciferSaratov, you wrote: LS> I actually consider that in Russia it is necessary to revive a public flogging for hooliganism and vandalism. LS>  dogs of streets to equate to vandalism. I support! Penalties money - a hogwash, steal. And here personal gentle  the new you will not buy, keep... Generally all hogwash from for cancellings of corporal punishments. Cancelled corporal punishments to noblemen - received revolt of Decembrists, cancelled to peasants - the wave of "revolts" went, cancelled a flogging at schools - received freethinking and , cancelled corporal punishments in army - received October revolution.

104

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

105

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

106

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

Hello, Alfarn, you wrote: A> do not accept. In the first an entrance it strongly special case, dogs  anywhere. And in one  there can live outwardly identical people with dogs of one breed. And as a result the person can resemble, passed by with a similar dog, and you sat at this time houses. Whence such confidence? On how many I saw similar cases - find during an instant.

107

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

R3> Whence such confidence? On how many I saw similar cases - find during an instant. Find when know whom and where to search. Well with addicts for example works. Well and with other serial cases of type  phones. Here the victim who can identify is still important and announcement to write. And it from fantasy area is simple on video. Besides, who these videos  will be? Automatics that you will not attach any on shit recognition. From a car penalties permanently overlays happen therefore as the automatic machine of the letter of happiness stamp, though the employee, and it even with automation should check everyone! And it is not visible, what there the doggie, it is simple so in a grass sat down either  or ? The dress at once to send for determination of composition of violation?

108

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> In itself any of these acts did not deserve severe punishment. However in many American states to criminals who got in the third time, give long periods even for insignificant offenses.  broke the law three times, and it hid for a grid for ever. [/q] Gulag needs slaves.

109

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

Hello, Alfarn, you wrote: A> Find when know whom and where to search. Well with addicts for example works. Well and with other serial cases of type  phones. Here the victim who can identify is still important and announcement to write. And it from fantasy area is simple on video. Besides, who these videos  will be? Automatics that you will not attach any on shit recognition. From a car penalties permanently overlays happen therefore as the automatic machine of the letter of happiness stamp, though the employee, and it even with automation should check everyone! And it is not visible, what there the doggie, it is simple so in a grass sat down either  or ? The dress at once to send for determination of composition of violation? To oblige to hang on dogs of number

110

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

Hello, Stanislaw K, you wrote: N>> absolutely suddenly if garbage there is no place to throw out it simply does not need to be thrown out you Carry with yourself, yet you will not find where it is possible to throw legally. SK> it . But perfectly works. I generally only for that all to ours it was good, convenient and comfortable but to suffer and pay for beastliness too categorically it would not be desirable. So it is necessary to do all, compensating penalties only one of sentences only on a certain class of problems. P.S. One only possibility creation/simplification to behave well - we not  more than 66 % of people with the correct behavior.

111

Re: Whether penalties <voting> are admissible

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> P.S. N> One only possibility creation/simplification to behave well - we not  more than 66 % of people with the correct behavior. Creating complexities generally you will achieve nothing.