26

Re: Velosimulator choice

E> Spat all these expensive training apparatus and decided to run simply. These are different sports, run does not replace a bicycle (and on the contrary).

27

Re: Velosimulator choice

Hello, SkyDance, you wrote: SD> It is different sports, run does not replace a bicycle (and on the contrary). The sense was not in a sport choice as that. But, by the way, that the bicycle that does not give run gives?

28

Re: Velosimulator choice

Hello, 13akaEagle, you wrote: E> And the wife so told. But at me a problem of such plan. For a long time lost  and in the course of time lost also all endurance, now on 5 floor without  not to get. Motivations on what except sports do not suffice, except as in the summer on a bicycle, therefore in gyms I do not walk. If it turns out this or next year make a plastics of sheaves and rehabilitation will be necessary, and it seemed to me that a velosimulator the best decision. After  a bicycle business the tenth. There at first it is necessary long and persistently a foot to bend that it to be bent the beginnings though somehow. Whether E>>> There is a sense to take more expensive model with the breast sensor or for eyes the cheapest suffices  VS700 or even? T>> if speech about the pulse sensor it separately it is possible to buy thousand for one and a half together with hours. E> I.e. if the velosimulator cannot regulate loading depending on pulse also the sense in it  complete with a training apparatus is not present? At you the whole heap of neurons in a head will miss all the same while you twist pedals, let track pulse,  and other nonsense. Not to assimilate to characters which  during time "". E>>> the Purpose - to raise  endurance. T>> it is better to go to sports club. There the spirit is better,  a variety of training apparatus. Pedals can quickly twist to bother, to alternate to others (on me the most melancholy and loading only on one group of muscles) better. E> gyms it not mine. Gyms yours the person who teaches only is necessary, checks, helps. If you are afraid to look bad there that it transits quickly. The pool too yours, but too is better with the trainer. And a velosimulator home this last that is necessary.

29

Re: Velosimulator choice

Hello, Kernan, you wrote: K> Krossfit. The Piece of good advice for the person without a knee.

30

Re: Velosimulator choice

Hello, Tyomchik, you wrote: Those> Those> 10 minutes of occupations with a skipping rope render on  system the effect equal to effect, received at overcoming on a bicycle of 3 km within 6 minutes, or to 12 minutes of float, or run on 2 km. Well here you spend twice more time, could on  Generally touch such comparing how to go? How to float? How to run? There loadings everywhere on orders differ depending on.

31

Re: Velosimulator choice

E> the Sense was not in a sport choice as that. And it was necessary to write, in what sense of "a velosimulator choice". E> But, by the way, that gives a bicycle that does not give run? Possibility to be engaged  on low pulse without fear for knees. Run - very severe piece, and at whom also excess of fat, to that generally seams.

32

Re: Velosimulator choice

Hello, 13akaEagle, you wrote: S>> the Normal bicycle. E> it already is. As a joke: I too have bicycle, therefore a question of a house velosimulator I solved so

33

Re: Velosimulator choice

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> but if it would be desirable to deliver by all means home, I would recommend "ellipse".  I pound more much. Only select where the amplitude is more. +1 for an ellipse. On it more than things it is possible to hang up.

34

Re: Velosimulator choice

Hello, SkyDance, you wrote: E>> But, by the way, that gives a bicycle that does not give run? SD> possibility to be engaged  on low pulse without fear for knees. Run - very severe piece, and at whom also excess of fat, to that generally seams. Excess of fat at me is not present, I thin. On-essence to run the beginnings on Monday and made only 2 runnings, minutes till 30-40 (a distance from 4 to 6 km). After the first running at once was  both in a problem knee, and in healthy, but for half an hour transited. Today made the second running and marvelously not  in knees of anything. Esteemed about pulse, bought a pulsator and indications confuse me a little. For half an hour around 150 ud/mines was only 30 % of time. At jogging in very slow rate pulse kept around 160 and sometimes left to 170 if dropped into a walk that fell to 130. As tried to run more all the same here worked in such not clear rate. But  the normal. If to consider  under the formula 220 - age,  = 187. But not to exaggerate at all years still about 8 years ago to a trauma I actively was engaged in the football, therefore any backlog at me was. The first purpose - a marathon on 5 which will be in a month. I do not know while in what rate to conduct trainings.

35

Re: Velosimulator choice

Hello, 13akaEagle, you wrote: E> Hello, SkyDance, you wrote: E>>> But, by the way, that gives a bicycle that does not give run? SD>> possibility to be engaged  on low pulse without fear for knees. Run - very severe piece, and at whom also excess of fat, to that generally seams. E> excess of fat at me is not present, I thin. On-essence to run the beginnings on Monday and made only 2 runnings, minutes till 30-40 (a distance from 4 to 6 km). After the first running at once was  both in a problem knee, and in healthy, but for half an hour transited. Today made the second running and marvelously not  in knees of anything. Esteemed about pulse, bought a pulsator and indications confuse me a little. For half an hour around 150 ud/mines was only 30 % of time. At jogging in very slow rate pulse kept around 160 and sometimes left to 170 there is no endurance of heart. Actually trains quickly enough if to train every day. If at run it is not possible to hold pulse in frames, it is possible to walk. Here the track running would help, since on it it is possible to walk in a hill, conveniently to pick up a corner and speed, what pulse to hold the necessary. On an equal surface I am afraid pulse will lift heavily to the necessary value unless to walk with loading (with a backpack for example) and in rate. The main thing to walk long (it is not less 40 minutes, is better at least hour) and every day, well or at least time 4 in a week.

36

Re: Velosimulator choice

Hello, tyomchick, you wrote: T> there is no endurance of heart. Actually trains quickly enough if to train every day. If at run it is not possible to hold pulse in frames, it is possible to walk. Here the track running would help, since on it it is possible to walk in a hill, conveniently to pick up a corner and speed, what pulse to hold the necessary. On an equal surface I am afraid pulse will lift heavily to the necessary value unless to walk with loading (with a backpack for example) and in rate. The main thing to walk long (it is not less 40 minutes, is better at least hour) and every day, well or at least time 4 in a week. And if I run at 160 instead of the track, than it threatens? At me tracks are not present also I already spent all budget for trousers,  and a pulsator.

37

Re: Velosimulator choice

Hello, 13akaEagle, you wrote: E> Hello, tyomchick, you wrote: E> And if I run at 160 instead of the track, than it threatens? E> at me tracks are not present also I already spent all budget for trousers,  and a pulsator. Yes probably to you with anything special does not threaten, unless it is heavier and it is possible to lose motivation. Aerobic rate is good that it generally "in easy" it is not necessary to suffer at all, at walking on the track I generally serials looked. Besides possibly big rate "is harmful" for  since it is considered that not fat, and precious meat but as I understood it not your case thus burns. If you want to run a marathon with  pulse certainly too it is necessary to train, even with big it can is necessary.

38

Re: Velosimulator choice

39

Re: Velosimulator choice