1

Topic: Whether curiosity is independent ?

Earlier here loved Savaleva who stated that the person moves only 3 motivations: to devour,  and to dominate. And here so it was pleasant to all, after all it reduced all to a primitive. Now, truth, the freak started to name. Well, and with this paradigm, what the person moves only 3 motivations, still agree? And, a question at me such - and how curiosity in itself? It exists or it does not exist and it is illusion (type it is deduced from there is nobody more basic principle)? Here, for example, I to myself ordered Flightfeeder the Author: Shmj Date: 07.03 19:57 with curiosity. And after all I should waste time on it, to deliver. But me it is very curious that it there catches at me that shows... It is curious to look GUI and as it all works. To feed - does not feed, on the contrary it is necessary to waste time on it. He too is not able to be engaged in sex. Well and to dominate by means of it it does not turn out. Well it is fine, you tell that all the same it is possible to dominate, type at you such piece is and at me is not present, already domination. Then other example. That did not speak that I dominate - I will not name a thingummy. But it is pure with curiosity with it it was taken 2 weeks without earnings perspectives. With what - I will not tell, that did not speak that I try to dominate. And so, whether there is a curiosity in itself, how independent ?

2

Re: Whether curiosity is independent ?

S> Well, and with this paradigm, what the person moves only 3 motivations, still agree? S> And, a question at me such - and how curiosity in itself? There are other models of a reality, in them there is a motivation "curiosity". An example in the book http://newbranding.ru/tamberg.pdf

3

Re: Whether curiosity is independent ?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> And so, whether there is a curiosity in itself, how independent ? Curiosity has for an object or training (at children) or mastering of resources (domination). In case of toys obviously in you plays the childhood. There is such book - "Games, in  people" play - Eric Bern wrote

4

Re: Whether curiosity is independent ?

Hello, solarwind, you wrote: S> Curiosity has for an object or training (at children) I.e. you enter new type of motivation - training? Here I also speak about it - at Savaeleva of it was not present. And unless training is applicable only to children? Why you think, what motivation of training  only for children?

5

Re: Whether curiosity is independent ?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> which stated And you state too. That that they are composed by people who know about life no more yours is good in these vital theories, so it. So what they stated, you can state the not less authoritatively.

6

Re: Whether curiosity is independent ?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> And unless training is applicable only to children? Why you think, what motivation of training  only for children? Unless it not so for other mammals?

7

Re: Whether curiosity is independent ?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Earlier here loved Savaleva, No, did not love.

8

Re: Whether curiosity is independent ?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> And so, whether there is a curiosity in itself, how independent ? Yes, this so-called research behavior. Even at the elementary is.